# Top 10 Cypress Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 108
The Software Testing Tools solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with Cypress. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Cypress include automation and features. The best overall Cypress alternative is BrowserStack. Other similar apps like Cypress are Apache JMeter, SOAPUI, TestComplete, and Zephyr Enterprise. Cypress alternatives can be found in [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) but may also be in [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools) or [AI Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-software-testing-tools).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Cypress
  - [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews)
  - [Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-jmeter/reviews)
  - [SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/products/soapui/reviews)
  - [TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/products/testcomplete/reviews)
  - [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews)
  - [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-tosca/reviews)
  - [Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-testim/reviews)
  - [TestProject](https://www.g2.com/products/testproject/reviews)
  - [Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-functional-testing/reviews)
  - [mabl](https://www.g2.com/products/mabl/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to Cypress Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Cypress stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Program Development, and Hospital & Health Care, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews)
By BrowserStack
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 3,358
BrowserStack is the world’s leading cloud-based testing platform, trusted by 50,000+ Dev and QA teams to deliver fast, reliable, and high-quality software. From manual to automated, visual to accessibility testing, BrowserStack brings every layer of the QA process onto a single, integrated platform, so you can ship confidently at scale. Our Products: Manual Testing Live: Cross-browser testing App Live: Real device testing Testing Toolkit: Essential manual testing tools Test Automation Automate: Browser automation cloud App Automate: Mobile app automation cloud Percy: Visual testing & review App Percy: Visual testing & review Management & Optimization Test Management: Plan, track, and manage tests Test Management for Jira: Manage tests inside Jira Test Reporting & Analytics: Monitor & optimize all tests Automation without coding Low Code Automation: AI-driven automated tests Website Scanner: All-in-one website checker


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, BrowserStack is:
- More expensive
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-cypress)
**Compare BrowserStack with other alternatives:**
- [BrowserStack vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-browserstack)
- [BrowserStack vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-soapui)
- [BrowserStack vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testcomplete)
- [BrowserStack vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [BrowserStack vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [BrowserStack vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [BrowserStack vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testproject)
- [BrowserStack vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-opentext-functional-testing)
- [BrowserStack vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-mabl)

  ### 2. [Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-jmeter/reviews)
By The Apache Software Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 158
Apache JMeter desktop application is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, Apache JMeter is:
- More expensive
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-cypress)
**Compare Apache JMeter with other alternatives:**
- [Apache JMeter vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-browserstack)
- [Apache JMeter vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-soapui)
- [Apache JMeter vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-testcomplete)
- [Apache JMeter vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Apache JMeter vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Apache JMeter vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Apache JMeter vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-testproject)
- [Apache JMeter vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-opentext-functional-testing)
- [Apache JMeter vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-mabl)

  ### 3. [SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/products/soapui/reviews)
By SmartBear
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 143
SOAPUI is a cross-platform functional testing solution that provides a graphical interface and allows you to create and execute automated functional, regression, compliance, and load tests.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, SOAPUI is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-soapui)
**Compare SOAPUI with other alternatives:**
- [SOAPUI vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-soapui)
- [SOAPUI vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-soapui)
- [SOAPUI vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-testcomplete)
- [SOAPUI vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [SOAPUI vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [SOAPUI vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [SOAPUI vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-testproject)
- [SOAPUI vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-soapui)
- [SOAPUI vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-mabl)

  ### 4. [TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/products/testcomplete/reviews)
By SmartBear
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 96
TestComplete Platform has an open flexible architecture that makes creating, maintaining, and executing automated tests across desktop, web, mobile easy, speedy, and cost effective.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, TestComplete is:
- More expensive
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-testcomplete)
**Compare TestComplete with other alternatives:**
- [TestComplete vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testcomplete)
- [TestComplete vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-testcomplete)
- [TestComplete vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-testcomplete)
- [TestComplete vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [TestComplete vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [TestComplete vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-testproject)
- [TestComplete vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-testcomplete)
- [TestComplete vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-mabl)

  ### 5. [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews)
By SmartBear
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 80
Zephyr E is an on-demand, cloud based Test Management Platform with innovative applications and unparalleled, metrics based visibility via real time dashboards.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, Zephyr Enterprise is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
**Compare Zephyr Enterprise with other alternatives:**
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-tosca-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-testim-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/zephyr-enterprise-vs-mabl)

  ### 6. [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-tosca/reviews)
By Tricentis
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 76
Tricentis Tosca enables companies to test and assess business-critical enterprise applications with unprecedented effectiveness and efficiency.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, Tricentis Tosca is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-tricentis-tosca)
**Compare Tricentis Tosca with other alternatives:**
- [Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-tosca-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-testim-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Tosca vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-tosca-vs-mabl)

  ### 7. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-testim/reviews)
By Tricentis
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 54
Tricentis Testim is a machine learning based test automation tool.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, Tricentis Testim is:
- More expensive
- Better at support
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-tricentis-testim)
**Compare Tricentis Testim with other alternatives:**
- [Tricentis Testim vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Tricentis Testim vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Tricentis Testim vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Tricentis Testim vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Tricentis Testim vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-testim-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Tricentis Testim vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-testim-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Tricentis Testim vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Tricentis Testim vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Tricentis Testim vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-testim-vs-mabl)

  ### 8. [TestProject](https://www.g2.com/products/testproject/reviews)
By TestProject
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 14
TestProject always keeps you up to date with the latest tools, libraries and SDKs required for creating automated tests for web and mobile apps on a variety of browsers and mobile devices, and on any operating system (Windows, Linux or macOS).


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, TestProject is:
- Better at support
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-testproject)
**Compare TestProject with other alternatives:**
- [TestProject vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testproject)
- [TestProject vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-testproject)
- [TestProject vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-testproject)
- [TestProject vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-testproject)
- [TestProject vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [TestProject vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [TestProject vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [TestProject vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-testproject)
- [TestProject vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-mabl)

  ### 9. [Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-functional-testing/reviews)
By OpenText
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 46
Test automation to make manual testing more efficient and let developers and testers collaborate.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, Opentext functional Testing is:
- More expensive
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-opentext-functional-testing)
**Compare Opentext functional Testing with other alternatives:**
- [Opentext functional Testing vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-opentext-functional-testing)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-opentext-functional-testing)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-soapui)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-testcomplete)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-tricentis-tosca)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-tricentis-testim)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-testproject)
- [Opentext functional Testing vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-mabl)

  ### 10. [mabl](https://www.g2.com/products/mabl/reviews)
By mabl
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 40
mabl is a low-code, intelligent test automation platform for Agile teams. Built for quality engineering, teams can easily create, execute, and maintain automated end-to-end tests, and integrate them directly into the entire development lifecycle.


Reviewers say compared to Cypress, mabl is:
- More expensive
- Better at support
Categories in common with Cypress: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)

**Compare:** [Cypress vs mabl](https://www.g2.com/compare/cypress-vs-mabl)
**Compare mabl with other alternatives:**
- [mabl vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-jmeter-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/compare/soapui-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/compare/testcomplete-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/zephyr-enterprise-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-tosca-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-testim-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs TestProject](https://www.g2.com/compare/testproject-vs-mabl)
- [mabl vs Opentext functional Testing](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-functional-testing-vs-mabl)


---
## Cypress Alternatives FAQs

### How does Cypress compare to BrowserStack?

According to G2 data, [Cypress](https://www.g2.com/products/cypress/reviews) holds a higher average rating of 4.7/5 from 107 reviews compared to [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews)'s 4.4/5 from 3,329 reviews. Cypress scores notably higher in usability (9.2 vs 8.9) and ease of setup (9.2 vs 8.9), with a 0.3-point lead in both dimensions, and also leads in ease of administration (9.3 vs 8.7) by 0.6 points. Both products share equal scores in support (8.7). Cypress is praised for its fast test execution, intuitive API, and strong debugging tools including time-travel capabilities, while BrowserStack is recognized for its extensive real device cloud, broad device and browser coverage, and seamless integration with automation frameworks like Selenium and Playwright. BrowserStack excels in providing access to real devices for cross-browser and mobile testing, enabling parallel test execution and CI/CD integration. However, Cypress is limited primarily to JavaScript and Chromium-based browsers, while BrowserStack supports a wider range of real devices and browsers. Cypress users highlight its simplicity and speed, whereas BrowserStack users emphasize its real device accuracy and broad platform coverage. Both have strong documentation and community support, but BrowserStack's larger user base reflects its enterprise-scale adoption.



### What are the best alternatives to Cypress?

Top alternatives to Cypress include [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) (4.4/5 with 3,329 reviews), [Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-jmeter/reviews) (4.3/5 with 157 reviews), [SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/products/soapui/reviews) (4.4/5 with 141 reviews), [TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/products/testcomplete/reviews) (4.2/5 with 97 reviews), and [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews) (4.1/5 with 80 reviews). These alternatives offer broader browser/device support, extensive protocol coverage, and integrated test management capabilities.



### What features do alternatives offer that Cypress does not?

Cypress lacks support for multiple browser tabs/windows, limited cross-browser testing primarily focused on Chromium-based browsers, no mobile device testing, limited language support restricted to JavaScript/TypeScript, and challenges with iframe handling and multi-domain testing.



### Which Software Testing tools do reviewers recommend instead of Cypress?

Reviewers recommend [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) for its extensive real device and cross-browser testing capabilities, ease of use, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. [Apache JMeter](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-jmeter/reviews) is favored for load and performance testing across multiple protocols. [SOAPUI](https://www.g2.com/products/soapui/reviews) is preferred for comprehensive API testing with support for REST and SOAP services. [TestComplete](https://www.g2.com/products/testcomplete/reviews) is recommended for its low-code automation and broad application support including desktop, web, and mobile. [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews) is valued for its seamless integration with Jira and effective test management features. Additionally, [Tricentis Testim](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-testim/reviews) (4.5/5 with 54 reviews) is noted for AI-powered self-healing tests and ease of maintenance, while [mabl](https://www.g2.com/products/mabl/reviews) (4.4/5 with 40 reviews) is praised for codeless automation and AI-driven test stability, both offering enhanced automation with reduced maintenance overhead compared to Cypress.



### Why do users choose BrowserStack over Cypress?

Users choose [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) over Cypress primarily for its comprehensive real device testing capabilities and extensive browser coverage. With 697 mentions of real devices and 645 mentions of device variety, BrowserStack enables testing on actual hardware across multiple OS versions and manufacturers, which is critical for catching device-specific bugs that emulators or browser-only tools like Cypress cannot detect. Its seamless integration with automation frameworks and CI/CD pipelines supports parallel test execution, significantly reducing regression testing time. BrowserStack's ability to test mobile apps and websites on real iOS and Android devices without maintaining physical labs is a major advantage, especially for teams requiring broad device coverage and cross-browser compatibility. Additionally, BrowserStack's local testing tunnel allows secure testing of internal or staging environments. Despite some reports of session latency and higher pricing, users value BrowserStack's reliability, scalability, and the confidence it provides in delivering consistent user experiences across diverse devices and browsers. These factors make BrowserStack the preferred choice for organizations prioritizing real device accuracy and comprehensive cross-platform testing.




## Explore Articles
- [Which Google Workspace project management tools turn emails into trackable tasks and sync with Calendar automatically?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-google-workspace-project-management-tools-turn-emails-into-trackable-tasks-and-sync-with-calendar-automatically)
- [Best for Voice Recognition](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-voice-recognition-programs-right-now)
- [Is Appy Pie worth it as a low code mobile app builder for a small team without dedicated IT staff, or does Thunkable cover the same use cases at lower complexity for non-developers?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-appy-pie-worth-it-as-a-low-code-mobile-app-builder-for-a-small-team-without-dedicated-it-staff-or-does-thunkable-cover-the-same-use-cases-at-lower-complexity-for-non-developers)
- [Which client side protection vendors are best at preventing data leakage from front-end JavaScript for a company running a lot of third-party analytics tags?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-client-side-protection-vendors-are-best-at-preventing-data-leakage-from-front-end-javascript-for-a-company-running-a-lot-of-third-party-analytics-tags)
- [Best 3D Modeling Software](https://www.g2.com/articles/best-3d-modeling-software)
- [Which Oracle Siebel resellers provide the strongest user adoption and change management support before committing to a multi-year CRM implementation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-oracle-siebel-resellers-provide-the-strongest-user-adoption-and-change-management-support-before-committing-to-a-multi-year-crm-implementation)

## Spotlight Categories
- [CMMS Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cmms)
- [Remote Monitoring & Management (RMM) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/remote-monitoring-management-rmm)
- [Analytics Platforms](https://www.g2.com/categories/analytics-platforms)