Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cucumber and Qase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00
Cucumber
Star Rating
(39)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CucumberQase
Star Rating
(269)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cucumber excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring a remarkable 9.4, which allows for efficient management of test cases. In contrast, Qase, while strong in other areas, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in test case management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Qase shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.3, making it more accessible for teams new to testing software. Cucumber, with a score of 8.0, may require a steeper learning curve, which could be a consideration for smaller teams or those without dedicated QA resources.
- G2 users highlight Qase's superior Quality of Support, rated at 9.6, which is significantly higher than Cucumber's 7.8. This suggests that users of Qase may experience more responsive and helpful customer service, a critical factor for teams needing quick resolutions to issues.
- Users on G2 report that Qase's Automation features, particularly in Reliability (9.2) and Thoroughness (8.8), provide a more robust framework for automated testing compared to Cucumber, which may not offer the same level of reliability in automated test execution.
- Reviewers mention that Qase's Product Direction, rated at 9.6, indicates a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, which is essential for teams looking for long-term software partnerships. Cucumber's lower score of 7.3 may raise concerns about its future development trajectory.
- Users say that Qase's Integration capabilities, rated at 8.2, allow for seamless connections with other tools, enhancing workflow efficiency. Cucumber's integration options, while present, may not be as extensive, potentially limiting its usability in diverse tech stacks.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cucumber
No pricing availableQase
Free
$0.00
For students, small projects, and non-profits.
- Up to 3 users
- 500Mb for attachments
- Test case management
Free Trial
Cucumber
No trial information availableQase
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
27
8.9
242
Ease of Use
8.1
27
9.3
246
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
9.3
176
Ease of Admin
7.6
7
9.3
110
Quality of Support
8.0
26
9.6
224
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
7
9.2
96
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
24
9.5
243
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
178
Not enough data
8.3
164
Not enough data
9.1
172
Management
Not enough data
8.7
173
Not enough data
8.3
163
Not enough data
8.7
163
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
82
Not enough data
8.9
83
Not enough data
8.5
82
Not enough data
8.9
82
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
80
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.3
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cucumber and Qase are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Cucumber has no unique categories
Qase is categorized as Test Management and Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cucumber
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Computer Software
17.6%
Retail
8.8%
Food & Beverages
5.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Other
32.4%
Computer Software
33.7%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Financial Services
6.1%
Program Development
3.8%
Hospital & Health Care
3.0%
Other
37.5%
Discussions
Cucumber has no discussions with answers
What is Qase?
2 Comments
GR
Qase is a test management tool.Read more
Qase has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
