Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Coverity and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00 1 users
Coverity
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CoverityGitHub
Star Rating
(2,267)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, Coverity, while still strong at 8.9, does not offer the same breadth of integrations, which some users find limiting.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, making it accessible for teams of all sizes, especially small businesses. Coverity, with a score of 8.4, is perceived as slightly more complex, which can be a hurdle for new users.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Task Management feature, scoring 8.9, as a standout for organizing and tracking project progress. Coverity's task management features, while functional, do not receive the same level of praise, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Documentation is highly rated at 8.7, providing clear guidance and support for users. In contrast, Coverity's documentation, while rated at 9.3, is noted for being more comprehensive but can be overwhelming for new users trying to navigate its complexities.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Coverity, with a score of 8.6, also offers good support, but some users feel it lacks the same level of engagement.
- Users say that GitHub's Deployment Automation feature, rated at 8.9, is particularly effective for streamlining the release process, making it a favorite among developers. Coverity's automation features, while rated at 8.8, do not provide the same level of user satisfaction, indicating a need for enhancement in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Coverity
No pricing availableGitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Coverity
No trial information availableGitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
43
9.3
1,964
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.7
1,980
Ease of Setup
8.2
19
9.0
591
Ease of Admin
8.2
19
8.7
451
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.8
1,571
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
18
8.9
387
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
40
8.9
1,916
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
8.3
11
9.2
48
9.0
12
9.0
47
Analysis
8.9
11
8.7
47
8.8
11
8.9
50
9.2
11
8.9
48
8.9
11
9.0
50
Testing
8.5
11
9.3
49
8.5
8
8.6
44
8.5
10
8.7
45
9.1
11
8.9
43
8.8
10
8.7
42
8.9
11
9.0
43
7.6
12
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
9.3
5
8.8
185
9.3
5
8.8
179
8.7
5
8.6
170
Security
7.0
5
8.3
167
8.3
5
8.6
168
8.3
5
9.0
177
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Coverity and GitHub are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Coverity is categorized as Static Code Analysis
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, and Build Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Coverity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Semiconductors
5.5%
Other
29.1%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Coverity has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
