Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Spanner 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBGoogle Cloud Spanner
Star Rating
(35)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud SpannerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud Spanner excels in ACID compliance with a score of 9.2, ensuring strong transactional integrity, while Azure Cosmos DB, although reliable, has a slightly lower score of 8.0 in this area, which may concern users needing strict transaction guarantees.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Spanner's data replication capabilities are robust, scoring 9.2, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications requiring high availability. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB also performs well with a score of 8.9, but some users feel it could improve in consistency during high-load scenarios.
- G2 users highlight that Azure Cosmos DB offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.6 compared to Google Cloud Spanner's 8.0, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to get started quickly without extensive training.
- Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Spanner shines in database monitoring with a score of 7.3, while Azure Cosmos DB outperforms with a score of 8.3, indicating that users find Azure's monitoring tools more effective for maintaining performance and troubleshooting issues.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Cosmos DB's backup and archiving features are more robust, scoring 8.3 and 8.4 respectively, compared to Google Cloud Spanner's lower scores of 6.7 and 7.0, which may be a deciding factor for users prioritizing data recovery options.
- Users say that Google Cloud Spanner's query language capabilities are highly rated at 8.9, providing powerful SQL support, while Azure Cosmos DB's query language scores lower at 7.9, leading some users to prefer Spanner for complex querying needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Spanner
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableGoogle Cloud Spanner
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
8.7
24
Ease of Use
8.2
48
7.8
24
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
8.2
10
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
8.7
9
Quality of Support
8.2
46
8.6
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
8.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
47
8.4
22
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Support
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Security
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Performance
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Database Features
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Security
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.6
16
8.2
10
7.8
15
7.6
9
8.3
15
7.3
10
7.2
9
8.1
8
8.7
15
8.1
8
Database Administration
8.4
15
8.2
10
7.6
9
6.3
10
7.1
8
7.0
10
Availability
8.9
16
8.8
10
8.3
16
6.7
9
8.4
15
7.0
10
8.6
16
8.1
9
Security
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
5.6
6
Not enough data
Data Management
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Spanner are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Key Value Databases, Document Databases, Graph Databases, and Columnar Databases
Google Cloud Spanner is categorized as Relational Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Spanner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Biotechnology
6.7%
Sports
3.3%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Spanner has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
