When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found AWS Elastic Load Balancing easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with AWS Elastic Load Balancing overall.
Reviewers felt that Amazon CloudFront meets the needs of their business better than AWS Elastic Load Balancing.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS Elastic Load Balancing is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS Elastic Load Balancing over Amazon CloudFront.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
No pricing available
Amazon CloudFront
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
No trial information available
Amazon CloudFront
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
75
9.1
159
Ease of Use
8.4
75
8.0
162
Ease of Setup
8.7
50
8.1
104
Ease of Admin
8.4
46
8.0
103
Quality of Support
8.5
72
8.2
133
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Elastic Load Balancing automatically distributes your incoming traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses, in one...Read more
AWS Elastic Load Balancing has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.