Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Autodesk CFD and OpenFOAM 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Autodesk CFD
Star Rating
(31)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Autodesk CFDOpenFOAM
Star Rating
(35)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenFOAMSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenFOAM excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.8, while Autodesk CFD shines in finite element analysis, scoring 9.1. Reviewers mention that OpenFOAM's capabilities in simulating complex fluid dynamics are robust, making it a preferred choice for users focused on fluid mechanics.
- Reviewers mention that Autodesk CFD offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.8 compared to OpenFOAM's 6.7. Users on G2 highlight that Autodesk's user-friendly interface and intuitive design tools significantly enhance the user experience, especially for those new to computational fluid dynamics.
- G2 users report that Autodesk CFD's rendering tools are rated at 8.7, outperforming OpenFOAM's 7.1. Reviewers say that Autodesk's advanced visualization capabilities allow for clearer presentation of simulation results, which is crucial for effective communication in design reviews.
- Users say that OpenFOAM's flexibility in customization is a strong point, but they also mention that it requires a steeper learning curve. In contrast, Autodesk CFD is praised for its quick setup and ease of administration, scoring 8.8 in these areas, making it more accessible for small businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Autodesk CFD's quality of support is rated at 8.8, significantly higher than OpenFOAM's 6.1. Users report that Autodesk provides comprehensive documentation and responsive customer service, which is vital for troubleshooting and maximizing software utility.
- Users on G2 highlight that OpenFOAM's command clarity is rated at 7.2, while Autodesk CFD scores 9.0. Reviewers say that Autodesk's clear command structure and well-defined workflows streamline the simulation process, making it easier for users to achieve their objectives efficiently.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Autodesk CFD
No pricing availableOpenFOAM
No pricing availableFree Trial
Autodesk CFD
No trial information availableOpenFOAM
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
22
8.0
26
Ease of Use
8.8
22
6.7
26
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
21
6.1
21
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
19
6.1
24
Features by Category
Design
8.6
14
6.2
11
8.6
15
6.1
11
8.8
15
6.8
11
8.7
15
7.1
12
Tools
9.4
15
8.8
13
9.1
15
6.5
8
8.8
15
6.3
8
Work
8.6
14
6.7
8
8.4
15
6.9
9
8.8
15
7.1
8
8.1
14
6.4
7
9.0
14
6.9
9
Environment
8.6
14
7.1
8
8.5
14
6.8
10
8.7
14
7.4
7
9.0
15
7.2
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Autodesk CFD and OpenFOAM are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Autodesk CFD has no unique categories
OpenFOAM has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Autodesk CFD
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenFOAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
20.0%
Oil & Energy
10.0%
Higher Education
10.0%
Design
10.0%
Manufacturing
6.7%
Other
43.3%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
30.3%
Automotive
18.2%
Research
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Autodesk CFD has no discussions with answers
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
OpenFOAM has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
