Users report that Aqua Security excels in Runtime Protection with a score of 8.3, while Google Container Security shines even brighter with a score of 9.0, indicating a stronger capability in safeguarding running applications.
Reviewers mention that Aqua Security's Dynamic Image Scanning feature scores 8.2, which is effective, but Google Container Security's score of 9.0 suggests a more robust and reliable scanning process for vulnerabilities in container images.
G2 users highlight that Aqua Security's Vulnerability Scanning is rated at 8.9, which is impressive, but Google Container Security outperforms with a score of 9.2, showcasing superior detection capabilities for potential threats.
Users on G2 say that Aqua Security's Threat Hunting feature is rated at 8.2, which is beneficial, but Google Container Security's score of 9.0 indicates a more proactive approach to identifying and mitigating threats.
Reviewers mention that Aqua Security's Network Segmentation feature scores 7.2, which is decent, but Google Container Security's impressive score of 9.5 highlights its effectiveness in isolating workloads to enhance security.
Users report that Aqua Security's Security Auditing feature is rated at 7.9, while Google Container Security's score of 9.1 suggests a more comprehensive and user-friendly auditing process, making it easier for teams to maintain compliance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aqua Security
No pricing available
Google Container Security
No pricing available
Free Trial
Aqua Security
No trial information available
Google Container Security
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
43
8.8
11
Ease of Use
8.6
55
7.7
11
Ease of Setup
8.5
46
8.5
9
Ease of Admin
8.1
35
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
42
8.6
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.