Users report that Ansys HFSS excels in finite element analysis with a score of 9.1, while Ansys Sherlock falls behind with a score of 7.7, indicating that HFSS is preferred for complex electromagnetic simulations.
Reviewers mention that the 3D modeling tools in Ansys HFSS are rated at 7.5, which is higher than Ansys Sherlock's 7.1, suggesting that HFSS provides a more robust environment for 3D design tasks.
G2 users highlight that Ansys HFSS has superior fluid analysis capabilities, scoring 8.3 compared to Ansys Sherlock's lack of this feature, making HFSS a better choice for projects requiring fluid dynamics simulations.
Users on G2 indicate that Ansys Sherlock offers better mechanical event simulation with a score of 8.3, while Ansys HFSS scores lower at 7.7, showing that Sherlock may be more suitable for mechanical design applications.
Reviewers say that the command clarity in Ansys HFSS is rated at 8.3, which is significantly better than Ansys Sherlock's 7.6, suggesting that HFSS provides a more intuitive user experience for command execution.
Users report that Ansys HFSS has a higher overall satisfaction rating with a G2 score of 4.5 compared to Ansys Sherlock's 4.4, indicating a slight edge in user experience and product reliability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ansys HFSS
No pricing available
Ansys Sherlock
No pricing available
Free Trial
Ansys HFSS
No trial information available
Ansys Sherlock
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
32
8.4
19
Ease of Use
8.6
32
8.2
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
28
8.6
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.