Top Tools at a Glance
Best for Fast, template-driven proposals | User Review "Dynamic Proposal Graphics and Advanced Analytics That Help Close Deals" CR Clotilde R. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for All-in-one proposal + CPQ automation | User Review "Automates Sales with Easy Integrations" ![]() KG Kaif G.
| ||
You may also like | |||
Best for Interactive, web-style proposals | User Review "Saves Time with Effortless Proposal Design" ![]() AH Aubrey H. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for High-volume RFP and questionnaire responses | User Review "Essential Collaboration Tool for Streamlined Responses" U Verified User Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Centralized RFP content management | User Review "Stellar Support and Polished RFPs" ![]() TA Tara A. Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Services proposals with recurring pricing | User Review "Effortless Proposals and Agreements with Smart Pricing Features" A Verified User Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Team-scaled proposal consistency | User Review "Excellent Data Security and Compliance Focus" U Verified User Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) | ||
Best for Proposal delivery with sales engagement | User Review "Improves Customer Experience & Houses All Info In One Digital Workspace For Customers" G Verified User Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Complex configuration and pricing proposals | User Review "A Systematic Way to Connect with Customers" ![]() NV Nagendra v. Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) | ||
Best for Proposal-to-billing automation for service firms | User Review "Transforms Client Engagements with Ease" ![]() DV Danielle V.
| ||
All-in-one proposal + CPQ automation
You may also like
High-volume RFP and questionnaire responses
Complex configuration and pricing proposals
Buyer's Guide: Proposal
All Proposal Tools
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users find Dasseti ENGAGE enhances efficiency by speeding up RFPs and DDQs, while centralizing responses effectively.
Users find Dasseti ENGAGE to be very user-friendly, appreciating its efficiency in streamlining RFPs and due diligence processes.
Users praise the fantastic customer support from Matt McLaughlin and team, enhancing their experience with Dasseti ENGAGE.
Users find Dasseti ENGAGE to have poor usability, reporting difficulties in navigation and clunky interface issues.
Users note feature deficiencies in Dasseti ENGAGE, particularly regarding question reading and limited file format support.
Users find Dasseti ENGAGE to be not user-friendly, requiring significant time to overcome its complex interface and limited customization.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the customization options in Lancelot, making it easy to align designs with their branding.
Users love the easy creation feature of Lancelot, enabling effortless customization that aligns with their branding needs.
Users appreciate the easy template creation which aligns recommendations perfectly with their branding needs.
Users find the editing difficulties cumbersome, leading to design issues that detract from the professional experience.
Users find the time-consuming process of client drafts and revisions hampers professionalism and leads to design issues.


























