--- title: Xurrent IMR Reviews meta_title: 'Xurrent IMR Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 202 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Xurrent IMR works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.5 review_count: 202 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-10-23' parent_category: name: IT Management url: https://www.g2.com/categories/it-management ---

Xurrent IMR Reviews & Product Details

Pricing

Pricing provided by Xurrent IMR.

Enterprise

Custom

Xurrent IMR Reviews (202)

Reviews

Xurrent IMR Reviews (202)

4.5
202 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the ease of use and seamless integrations of Xurrent IMR, highlighting its ability to streamline incident management and alerting processes. The intuitive interface and responsive customer support enhance user satisfaction, making it a reliable choice for teams. However, some users note that the UI could be more modern and that certain advanced features may require a learning curve.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Divyansh M.
DM
Divyansh M.
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Proactive Alerts and Easy Integration, with Room to Improve Automation"
4/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

I like getting alerts before an incident happens, based on thresholds we’ve configured, through Slack, SMS, or email. That helps us spot production issues early and solve them before a full failure or production downtime. I also like the integration with our microservices, the live incident reporting, and having postmortems and resolutions. Xurrent IMR helps automate our SRE work and provide RCAs. In Xurrent Pro, the AI can listen in on meetings, give a brief, and automatically post RCAs. It was easy to integrate after we went through the documentation, and I like having more ways to receive alerts than we had with Grafana, including phone, SMS, Slack, and email. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

I think the UI could be a bit more interactive, and the automated processes like RCAs are still in their initial phase and aren’t that efficient yet. I expect they’ll get better over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AS
Abhishek S.
Data Engineer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Fast, Reliable Alerting with Smooth Shift Rotations in Xurrent IMR (Zenduty)"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

Previous Response: We use Xurrent IMR (Zenduty) as our primary alerting mechanism, and its shift rotation feature has been particularly valuable for managing on-call responsibilities efficiently. As our organization was involved in the FIFA World Cup 2026, having a reliable and responsive alerting system became critical. The platform’s speed and escalation capabilities proved highly effective. We configured an IVR-based alerting process that immediately calls the assigned L1 engineer when an incident occurs. If the L1 engineer does not respond, the alert is automatically escalated to the L2 and then the L3 engineers, ensuring that critical incidents are addressed without unnecessary delay. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

Previous Response: As of now nothing, we get almost all our requirements fullfilled with current tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ankit S.
AS
Ankit S.
Devops Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Effortless Alert Management and Visibility"
5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

I like that Xurrent IMR helps me monitor alerts across different platforms in one place, and this includes platforms like GCP, AWS, GuardDuty, or Grafana Prometheus. The way it routes them to a singular channel simplifies my day. Plus, I can tag critical business metrics easily. The automated calls feature is something I enjoy, as I can acknowledge alerts with a simple button press, even without good internet. Having all of my alerts consolidated is very helpful for us, enhancing alert visibility and ensuring timely responses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

Sometimes I get repeated alerts, and they could be clubbed together in a better way. It's like, there should be an option to consolidate them to make it more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hatim B.
HB
Hatim B.
DevOps Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Streamlined Incident Management with Great GCP Integration and Support"
4/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

What I like best about Xurrent IMR is its ability to streamline incident management and response processes in a very organized and efficient way. The platform provides excellent visibility into incidents, making it easier for teams to track, prioritize, and resolve issues quickly. Its intuitive interface reduces the learning curve, while the automation capabilities help minimize manual effort and improve response times. I also appreciate the detailed reporting and audit trails, which make it easier to analyze incidents and drive continuous improvement. Overall, Xurrent IMR helps improve operational efficiency, collaboration, and service reliability across teams.

integration with GCP is also very good

best pricing overall when searched simillar products

support is also quick and reliable Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

The user interface could be more modern, and some advanced configurations require a bit of a learning curve for new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Raghav A.
RA
Raghav A.
DevOps Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Reliable Core Alerting, but Integrations and Customization Need Work"
2.5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

We’ve been using Xurrent mainly for incident alerting and on-call management, somewhat similar to PagerDuty. Overall, the platform is reliable for receiving alerts, and the UI/UX is definitely one of its stronger points — the interface feels modern, clean, and easy to navigate compared to many traditional ITSM tools.

From an integrations perspective, there’s still room for improvement. Connecting with newer MCP servers, AI tooling, and DevOps agents was more challenging than expected. We especially struggled while trying to integrate with our DevOps agent workflows. The payloads being sent also contain limited contextual information, which reduces flexibility for automation and troubleshooting.

Performance-wise, alert delivery itself has been stable and timely, so we haven’t faced major issues with missed alerts. However, advanced conditional alerting, templating, and customization capabilities feel limited right now. For teams with more complex routing or automation requirements, this can become restrictive.

Support and onboarding have been positive overall. The support team is responsive and helpful whenever issues are raised, which definitely improves the experience.

On the AI/intelligence side, the current capabilities still feel fairly basic. AI-driven insights, automation intelligence, and contextual recommendations are not yet at the level we expected, especially compared to newer AI-first operational platforms.

Overall, Xurrent works well for core alerting use cases and offers a good user experience, but it could improve significantly in integrations, alert customization, and AI-driven intelligence to better support modern DevOps environments.

Pricing wise it is good, compared to other competitors, but again that is coming on the cost of less features others are offering. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

One area where Xurrent could improve is outbound integrations and alert customization capabilities. While using outgoing webhooks, we noticed that important attributes like alert priority are missing from the payload. This limits the ability to build richer automations and makes downstream integrations less effective for incident routing and escalation workflows.

We also faced challenges with the Slack integration. Features like postmortem updates and incident communication do not fully support Slack thread-based workflows, which creates fragmentation in discussions and makes collaboration harder during active incidents.

Another limitation is the lack of advanced conditional alerting and incident segregation. Currently, we are unable to properly group or route alerts into incidents based on custom conditional statements or logic. For teams handling large alert volumes, this can create operational noise and increase manual effort for incident management.

It would be helpful if Xurrent enhanced webhook payload customization, added stronger Slack thread support, and introduced more flexible conditional rules for alert grouping and routing. These improvements would significantly improve automation, reduce operational overhead, and make the platform more effective for modern DevOps and SRE workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Reliable Incident Alerting with Excellent ChatOps Integration"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

What stands out most about Xurrent IMR is its intuitive UI/UX and smooth integration with our ChatOps workflow (Slack). Alerts are routed reliably without creating excessive noise. The Sera AI incident summarization feature is a massive time-saver for catching up on ongoing incident updates without needing to scroll through hundreds of messages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

While core alerting works well, reporting options and post-mortem template customization could be improved. Exporting post-incident reports into external tools like Confluence still requires some manual formatting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dhavan R.
DR
Dhavan R.
Software Engineer II
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Zenduty User Experience Review"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

- Zenduty is very userfriendly and easy to use.

- Implementation process is very simple and easy.

- All Incoming and Outgoing Integrations are easy to setup.

- Zenduty customer support is best in the business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

- Stakeholder template should be editable from Teams.

- Incidents should have a criteria to clear before resolving. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Alka Gupta of Xurrent IMR

Hi Dhavan,

We're glad to hear that you find Zenduty user-friendly and easy to use. Our goal is to make incident management and alerting as seamless as possible.

Pancham K.
PK
Pancham K.
SDE 1
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Dynamic, Rock-Solid Alert Configuration That Fits Any Requirement"
5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

Their alert configuration is really dynamic and solid. I can set up alerts based on any of my requirements, which makes it easy to tailor everything to what I need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

I haven’t come across any use case where xurrent has let me down. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Spandan D.
SD
Spandan D.
DevOps Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Awesome Integrations and Strong Features with Xurrent IMR"
5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

The integration of Xurrent IMR with software like Grafana, Teams, etc. is awesome, and the overall features are really good as well. Yes!! I would recommend Zenduty to everyone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

The app isn’t very informative, at least compared to the Web UI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

nishant k.
NK
nishant k.
SDE
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Outstanding UI/UX, Integrations, and AI Performance with Great Support"
5/5
What do you like best about Xurrent IMR?

UI / UX,Integrations,Performance,AI,Support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Xurrent IMR?

Pricing / ROI,

Onboarding,

rest all are fine for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about Xurrent IMR? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

GU
Guest User

What is StatusCast used for?

0 Upvotes
0
Join the conversation
GU
Guest User
•
Last activity over 2 years ago

What is Zenduty used for?

0 Upvotes
1
Join the conversation

Pricing Options

Pricing provided by Xurrent IMR.

Enterprise

Custom

Growth

$15
per user per month

Starter

$5
per user per month
Xurrent IMR Comparisons
Xurrent IMR Features
Constant Monitoring
Timely Alerts
TIcket Accuracy
Ticket Assignment
Standardization
Lifecycle Visualization
AI Text Generation
AI Text Summarization
Autonomous Task Execution
Multi-step Planning
Cross-system Integration