Xinet, unlike most platforms, offers the combination of the backend of a traditional fileserver for ease of bulk ingestion, and a web-based front end browser-based proxy--media engagement (altho that can be a double-edged sword if you don't adequately assess the server resources/cores you will require to generate proxies in near realtime. Without adequate cores, etc... it's easy for the proxy db generation to fall behind the live-file engagement from the backend, holding up your front-end UI workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The platform Is not configurable for the most part... requires development and/or customized dev to build what you need. As expected, that makes for tricky - and often expensive - release management.
If you're hosting on a non-VM environment, traditional hardware gets expensive to replace every couple years, or when you outgrow the current build due to demand.
Lack of a hybrid engagement is rather shameful (cloud/SaaS/on-prem) in 2021.
Front end UI from all sources ranges from weak to poorly designed (regardless if you use 3rd party experiences, Xinet-provided, etc).
Lack of native AI is weak
Lack of native data exchange acceleration like UDP is weak
The webnative admin console is horrendous. UI/UX is desperately needed.
The company historically didn't provide advance release roadmaps, and/or product roadmaps to give clients a nod as to where the platform's going. That's terrible,
There's more... but the build does offer a modicum of positives as well. It truly comes down to what you need, and why. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.





