This reviewer's identity has been verified by our review moderation team. They have asked not to show their name, job title, or picture.
Xinet, unlike most platforms, offers the combination of the backend of a traditional fileserver for ease of bulk ingestion, and a web-based front end browser-based proxy--media engagement (altho that can be a double-edged sword if you don't adequately assess the server resources/cores you will require to generate proxies in near realtime. Without adequate cores, etc... it's easy for the proxy db generation to fall behind the live-file engagement from the backend, holding up your front-end UI workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The platform Is not configurable for the most part... requires development and/or customized dev to build what you need. As expected, that makes for tricky - and often expensive - release management.
If you're hosting on a non-VM environment, traditional hardware gets expensive to replace every couple years, or when you outgrow the current build due to demand.
Lack of a hybrid engagement is rather shameful (cloud/SaaS/on-prem) in 2021.
Front end UI from all sources ranges from weak to poorly designed (regardless if you use 3rd party experiences, Xinet-provided, etc).
Lack of native AI is weak
Lack of native data exchange acceleration like UDP is weak
The webnative admin console is horrendous. UI/UX is desperately needed.
The company historically didn't provide advance release roadmaps, and/or product roadmaps to give clients a nod as to where the platform's going. That's terrible,
There's more... but the build does offer a modicum of positives as well. It truly comes down to what you need, and why. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The reviewer uploaded a screenshot or submitted the review in-app verifying them as current user.
Validated through LinkedIn
Organic review. This review was written entirely without invitation or incentive from G2, a seller, or an affiliate.





