.NET Reviews & Product Details

What I like most about .NET is its versatility. It offers a wide range of tools and packages that make it easy to integrate different services seamlessly and build on top of them. For example, it covers everything from basic multithreading and efficient logging to integration with modern cloud technologies—you name it, and it’s available in .NET. On top of that, I personally love the performance of backend applications built with .NET. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

.NET is from Microsoft. Having worked on both Spring Boot and Entity Framework, which are based on Java and C# respectively, I still feel the documentation and the number of resources available for .NET are much less compared to Java or Spring Boot. Because of that, the learning curve for .NET feels quite steep. It’s also fairly code-intensive. In my experience, maintaining .NET code can be a bit troublesome and often requires stronger architectural understanding and more code expertise. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The greatest strength of .NET lies in its evolution into a high-performance, open-source, and truly cross-platform ecosystem. With C# as its flagship language, developers benefit from a perfect balance of readability and power. Features like LINQ, asynchronous programming, and the robust NuGet library system allow for rapid development of enterprise-grade applications that run natively on Linux, macOS, and Windows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The primary frustration often stems from the fragmentation of documentation. Because the framework has transitioned from the old ".NET Framework" to ".NET Core" and now just ".NET," searching for solutions often yields outdated or irrelevant code snippets. Additionally, the sheer size of the SDK and the complexity of project configuration files can feel "heavy" compared to more minimalist environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use the .NET platform as the foundation for our custom microservices because it delivers strong performance, a consistent development experience, and smooth cross‑platform deployment. Integrating .NET with Azure Arc has made it easy to manage and monitor our services across hybrid and multi‑cloud environments without adding operational overhead. The framework’s open‑source ecosystem, backed by an active community and reliable Microsoft support, has made implementation straightforward and ongoing maintenance far simpler and we have lot of boilerplate templates available. Overall, .NET continues to adapt well as our architecture grows and evolves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing that adds overhead to any platform it is "its dependency management and version's" but this is required to keep the systems secure.

In case of .NET, it is bit more hectic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

.NET is basically of Core and Frameworks and mostly used for Desktop as well as web applications due to its light weight, secure, scalable and high performance. Because of its multi cloud support it widely used across the industry. It's even backed by Microsoft for well known trust. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even though it's open source as it's backed by Microsoft certain advanced features we still need payment even for certain integrations as well which isn't good. Due to its complexity ofcourse it's not beginner friendly. .NET support single released version mostly supports only for 3 years which it's great in terms of upgrades to applications. In addition, larger runtimes offen consumes 100% RAM and CPU usage which isn't that great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about .NET is how stable and well-structured it is. The framework feels mature and reliable, especially for long-term projects. It provides strong tooling support through Visual Studio, excellent documentation, and a consistent coding experience. I also appreciate how .NET supports multiple languages and works well for building scalable, high-performance applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside of .NET is that it can feel heavy for smaller or simpler projects. There is a learning curve, especially for beginners who are new to its ecosystem and conventions. Sometimes dependency management and configuration can become complex, and performance tuning may require deeper framework knowledge compared to lighter platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I started my programming career with QBasic (as a teenager, it was Commodore and BBC BASIC) before moving through VB for DOS, Visual Basic, ASP, and finally .Net—starting with VB.net before biting the bullet and switching to C#.

From 2001 to 2012, I developed .Net browser-based applications on a daily basis, before moving to the Umbraco CMS, which is a .Net CMS system and is both very good and easy to use.

I used .Net to develop web pages as well as to integrate the CMS with other backend systems (mostly databases). I found it straightforward to implement system integrations, largely because of the range of features that .Net provides.

On the few occasions I’ve needed customer support—for example, when I was asking about digital accessibility—I found the support team very helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

.Net has got a bigger and bigger footprint over the years and I do get a hankering for the old "code behind" aspx pages which were like developing in Visual Basic, but that's because I'm old and have a fondness for those years at the beginning of my career! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

.NET makes building secure, scalable applications easier. I appreciate its excellent tooling and how it works well across different platforms and development environments. The security features in .NET help me build applications with strong authentication and data protection without extra effort. Its scalability allows me to start small and grow applications without changing the core architecture, handling increased traffic and workload smoothly, whether on a single server or in the cloud. The tooling is a big plus because it simplifies everyday work. Features like strong debugging, code completion, and performance profiling help catch issues early and speed up development. I also find the initial setup of .NET fairly easy, with a straightforward installation process and clear documentation, especially when using Visual Studio. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some parts of .NET can feel complex, especially for beginners, because there are many frameworks and options to choose from. Setup and configuration can sometimes be time-consuming, and updates or version changes may require extra effort to keep projects consistent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most is the robust ecosystem. There's practically a library for everything, and Microsoft's official documentation is very well done, which greatly speeds up my work. Furthermore, with the latest versions, performance has improved significantly, and the fact that it's now cross-platform allows me to work on different environments without too many headaches Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the initial setup can seem a bit overwhelming, especially for small projects with a lot of boilerplate code. Another thing I find frustrating is switching between older versions of the Framework and .NET Core/5+; if you have to work with legacy code, the difference is noticeable, and the migration isn't always a walk in the park. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like about .NET is its strong performance and scalability, which makes it a reliable choice for enterprise applications. The framework also includes solid built-in security, so applications feel safer by design. I’m a fan of C# as well, since it’s clean, type-safe, and remains easy to maintain even as a codebase grows. Visual Studio is another major advantage—it provides excellent debugging and development tools that help boost productivity. The cross-platform support is a big benefit too, allowing applications to run on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Finally, the smooth integration with Azure, SQL Server, and other Microsoft services makes it much easier to build, deploy, and manage applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about .NET is that it can be tough for beginners because of its steep learning curve and sometimes complex project structure. It can also feel verbose, often requiring more boilerplate code than lighter technologies. The versioning model and frequent updates can be confusing as well, especially for new developers who are trying to figure out the right setup to use. For smaller projects or quick prototypes, .NET may come across as heavy and a bit overengineered. On top of that, a lot of the learning resources seem geared toward enterprise-level scenarios, which makes it harder for newcomers to find straightforward, beginner-friendly examples. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about .NET is its maturity, performance, and strong ecosystem. It offers excellent tooling through Visual Studio, along with solid documentation and a large, helpful community. The framework feels very stable and scalable, which makes it a good fit for both small projects and enterprise-level applications. Its cross-platform support with .NET Core/.NET 6+ and strong integration with cloud services also help make development faster and more reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While .NET is very powerful, the learning curve can be steep for beginners, especially given the frequent changes between versions. Some configuration steps and project setup choices can feel overly complex, and updates sometimes introduce breaking changes that force refactoring. For very lightweight applications, .NET can also feel comparatively heavy versus some alternative frameworks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.