WireGuard Reviews & Product Details

Implemented with only 4000 lines of code, it is fast and easily examined for vulnerabilities. The integration with Ubiquiti gateways (Dream Machine et. al.) is easily implemented on both the gateway and endpoints. It's cross-platform capability allow connectivity from nearly all endpoints including iOS, Android, Windows, MacOS and Linux. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Managing, distributing and securing client keys is problematic which is why it should be limitied to SOHO applications. A client key allows access from any endpoint with no relationship to user or app identity. Security requires regular review of logs to reveal potential compromise because a compromised configuration file permits unrestricted access to the target environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It installs very simply, is very secure, and above all, provides the most bandwidth. Additionally, it is one of the most updated, so it works faster and more securely with less source code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The administration interface is rough and simple compared to others like OpenVPN, and the application is the same. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wiregaurd performance in terms of low latency of data transfer and speed of tunnel establishment is really noticeable to end-user applications when compared to other VPN technologies (and I'm an OpenVPN user of many years, many sites, and many deployment models).

The Wireguard client (on iOS) allows you to define rules when it should connect on demand. This feature is simply not a concept in the OpenVPN world where you have to decide to turn the VPN client on or off. With Wireguard the VPN client will establish a connection automatically when you attempt to make connection to an IP address behind the firewall. In the (iOS) client, being able to include or exclude SSIDs for connect-on-demand is a real game-changer, all very easy to configure in the app. As is "only connect when on mobile" networks, etc, it is a well-thought-out implementation. And clients are available for Win/Lin/Mac/iOS/Android/Raspberry. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

All of my Wireguard experience is with pFsense as the Wireguard server. Wireguard is currently in beta on both the client app side and firewall package side, take from that what you will. I've got Windows, Mac and iPhone/iPad and Android phone clients all running. I can't yet get the Mikrotik client working (though I will), it requires some config in Mikrotik's Web UI and some via Mikrotik's command line, maybe that's part of the beta nature of Wireguard. Wireguard's iOS app contains dial-on-demand features but the Android client does not (at least at the time of writing). Wireguard configurations are made by you (the Wireguard admin) by hand (text editor) plus requiring a few command line tools to create keys, which is maybe not for everyone. However it's in crafting the text file configurations where Wireguard is simple but simply not as easy as OpenVPN. This means that scaling a Wireguard installation to hundreds of users at this time is probably not practical. Getting those hand-cranked Wireguard client configuration lines right and in the right order in the config file is not trivial. The exact config lines that are needed for a Wireguard config to work on Android will throw a syntax error if used on a Windows client. There are entries in the client side config file that the Wireguard client already knows, so why should you have to define them in the client-side config file? There are no complete guides to configuring Wireguard either on the firewall side or client side. There are "some" online guides, but none of them are complete, a few are error-free, and the examples aren't great. Netgate's example's don't even have sample values. Wireguard as a protocol is very silent, so debugging a non-working Wireguard connection by looking in the client-side or firewall logs is pretty pointless. But I love Wireguard because once it's working it is exceptional, and once you define your template configs for each client type and scenario you'll be able to reuse them many times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It uses the newest crypto protocols which can convert data more efficiently Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Client software doesn't have a lot of features or configuration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance: WireGuard uses modern cryptographic algorithms that are optimized for high performance.

Integration with the Linux kernel: WireGuard is integrated into the Linux kernel, which gives it excellent performance and seamless integration.

Simplified configuration: The configuration of WireGuard is much more intuitive and straightforward compared to other VPN solutions.

Roaming: Another advantage is the ability to maintain the connection even if the IP address changes, which is useful for mobile users.

In summary, WireGuard offers a modern and streamlined approach to VPNs, eliminating complexity while providing a secure and high-performance solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Relative youth: WireGuard is relatively new compared to other established VPN protocols like OpenVPN or IPSec. This means it hasn't been as extensively tested "in real-world conditions" as its older counterparts.

Lack of advanced features: The simplicity of WireGuard is both a strength and a weakness. It lacks some of the advanced features that other VPN protocols offer, such as two-factor authentication or fine-grained access rights management.

Not yet integrated everywhere: Although WireGuard is integrated into the Linux kernel, not all systems and devices support it natively yet.

IP address privacy: Unlike other VPN solutions, WireGuard does not mask clients' IP addresses on the server. This can pose privacy issues, as the server is aware of the IP addresses of all connected clients.

Key regeneration: Currently, WireGuard does not support automatic session key regeneration during an active connection, which is a common practice in other VPN protocols to enhance security.

Log management: WireGuard does not have an integrated logging system, which can make troubleshooting or monitoring connections more difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the security that Wireguard gives really allows for a safe electronic environment. I believe that the VPN allows for a simpler and quicker form of tech for the consumer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I feel like the website and the program is clunky and might need some updated visually but nothing bad to say of the operating system! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very easy to connect compared to other VPN`s.Lot of Feasibility Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it get disconnected easily this is to be fixed Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the key advantages of WireGuard is its simple and easy-to-use configuration. With just a few lines of code, you can set up a VPN connection between two devices, and it is much easier to manage compared to other VPN protocols. This makes it a great choice for both tech-savvy users and beginners who are new to VPNs. Another advantage of WireGuard is its speed. Since it is a modern protocol that is designed with speed in mind, it can offer faster connection speeds compared to other VPN protocols. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

WireGuard is still a relatively new protocol, and it hasn't undergone as much scrutiny as more established VPN protocols. While it has undergone security audits and is generally considered to be secure, there is still a chance that vulnerabilities could be discovered in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For installing and setting it up, you need a brief to adjust the right settings if you are using it work business goals. Once you set it up, it is very easy to use. I like how it is so efficient and easy to use the best. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While setting it up, you might get confused. Due to the OS and device that you are using, it can be used as an APP based. The hardest part is setting up for the Y generation mid-level computer user. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is simple and fast to work with .I have had the opportunity to configure it as and admistrator and as a normal end user and I must say configuration on both ends is very easy and straightforward Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I will say its UI it's very plane and less detailed if there were more pictures and user walk throughs it will be more captivating for first time users and people who happen to glance on the application Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.