What do you like best about symplr Contract?
I am a 'super admin' and am in symplr every day as part of my role in Contract Management; I also instruct and assist others on how to use the platform as part of internal 'customer support'. I have worked with other contract/ case management platforms, so I have a solid understanding of what is needed for my org. symplr provides the basics, such as being a vast contract repository; in-depth data reporting; provider/vendor contact management;customizable user settings; admin customization for back-end management; and straight-forward workflow processing. symplr offers a lot of flexibility in structuring user permissions, which is great when we are handling highly confidential contracts that require a limited audience. They also have a 'Knowledge Base', which is their version of a resource catalogue that can be referenced for most aspects of the platform. There are frequent webinars available for users and they offer those recorded webinars in the catalogue. The Help Desk is also pretty responsive when tickets are submitted, which is so helpful when there are critical requests that need to be handled ASAP. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about symplr Contract?
For the good that symplr offers, it seems as though it doesn't quite reach its full potential across several areas.
* Reporting features are great and can be done across many areas of symplr. However there are still data points that we cannot report on and have to request from the Help Desk frequently. You can create numerous custom fields/ data points (great!), all of which can be reported on (great!); however, if your data point is not a custom field and not one of the pre-selected data points they've structured to be reported on, it is not reportable and requires their Development team to provide (inconvenient).
* I wish there was more communication from the Help Desk regarding known glitches or issues; typically we have to wait until our users inform us of issues, then we reach out to the Help Desk for confirmation and guidance and they were already aware. If admins knew that on the front end, we could inform our users before they reach out for help.
* Development is usually slow and a lot of our requests for modifications are put on a "wish list" that may or may not get implemented in future updates.
* Use is not intuitive and almost always requires training on the front end for new users.
* Technological innovation does not seem to be on the forefront for the company, at least not for the Contract product. There is currently no AI functionality and it feels that there is no interest to pursue that, which is unfortunate because that would significantly elevate the product (we need this!).
* Reviews in workflows are not concurrent, but sequential, which can delay processing. It would be great if it offers both and lets the user choose which is necessary for the situation.
* It feels like it has a lot of features and functionality, which can be GREAT, but it can also cause workflow to be inefficient. For example, workflows have a "Start Phase" and "Complete Phase" button/ process that gives the users control over the phase progression. This is great, but is not intuitive for new users and results in WF's getting stuck because the user did not know they needed to press those buttons to proceed, or they simply forget/ get distracted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.