# Top 10 STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate Alternatives &amp; Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 83
The Construction Estimating Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate. Construction Estimating Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking simple, secure software solutions with field coordination, integrations, and cost calculators. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate include features and user interface. The best overall STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate alternative is Methvin. Other similar apps like STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate are Procore, ProEst, Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud), and PlanSwift. STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate alternatives can be found in [Construction Estimating Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software) but may also be in [Construction Project Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-project-management) or [Jobsite Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management).


## Best Paid &amp; Free Alternatives to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate
  - [Methvin](https://www.g2.com/products/methvin/reviews)
  - [Procore](https://www.g2.com/products/procore/reviews)
  - [ProEst](https://www.g2.com/products/proest/reviews)
  - [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud/reviews)
  - [PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/products/planswift/reviews)
  - [Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/products/bluebeam/reviews)
  - [Simpro](https://www.g2.com/products/simpro/reviews)
  - [Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/products/fieldwire-by-hilti/reviews)
  - [HCSS](https://www.g2.com/products/hcss/reviews)
  - [Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/products/safetyculturehq/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current &amp; previous users in industries like Construction, Retail, and Real Estate, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Methvin](https://www.g2.com/products/methvin/reviews)
By Methvin
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 105
Methvin is an online estimating application that allows you to generate quality cost estimates and winning bids allowing you to link worksheets to multiple tasks, set variables and to break tasks into sub schedules for pricing.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Methvin is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to set up
- More usable
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff), [Jobsite Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare Methvin with other alternatives:**
- [Methvin vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-procore)
- [Methvin vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-proest)
- [Methvin vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-methvin)
- [Methvin vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-planswift)
- [Methvin vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-methvin)
- [Methvin vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-simpro)
- [Methvin vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-methvin)
- [Methvin vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-methvin)
- [Methvin vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-safetyculturehq)

  ### 2. [Procore](https://www.g2.com/products/procore/reviews)
By Procore Technologies
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 4,249
Procore is an online construction software for project management, cost management, communications and collaboration.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Procore is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff), [Jobsite Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/procore-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare Procore with other alternatives:**
- [Procore vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/proest-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/procore-vs-simpro)
- [Procore vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-procore)
- [Procore vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-procore)

  ### 3. [ProEst](https://www.g2.com/products/proest/reviews)
By Autodesk
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 63
ProEst is a construction estimating software that allows you to create estimates, perform digital takeoffs, manage the bid day process and generate reports and proposals.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, ProEst is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/proest-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare ProEst with other alternatives:**
- [ProEst vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-proest)
- [ProEst vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/proest-vs-procore)
- [ProEst vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-proest)
- [ProEst vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-proest)
- [ProEst vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-proest)
- [ProEst vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/proest-vs-simpro)
- [ProEst vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-proest)
- [ProEst vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-proest)
- [ProEst vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-proest)

  ### 4. [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud/reviews)
By Autodesk
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 5,385
Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) connects workflows, teams and data at every stage of construction to reduce risk, maximize efficiency, and increase profits. Built on a unified platform and common data environment, Autodesk Construction Cloud empowers general contractors, specialty trades, designers and owners to drive better business outcomes. Construction teams will have a comprehensive construction management platform with all data in one central location to simplify collaboration, proactively anticipate project changes and provide data-driven guidance for organizational improvement.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff), [Jobsite Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management), [Autodesk Construction Cloud Integration Partners](https://www.g2.com/categories/autodesk-construction-cloud-integration-partners)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) with other alternatives:**
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-methvin)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-procore)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-proest)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-planswift)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-bluebeam)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-simpro)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-fieldwire-by-hilti)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-hcss)
- [Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-safetyculturehq)

  ### 5. [PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/products/planswift/reviews)
By ConstructConnect
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 35
Construction Takeoff and Estimating Software


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, PlanSwift is:
- Easier to set up
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare PlanSwift with other alternatives:**
- [PlanSwift vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-planswift)
- [PlanSwift vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-procore)
- [PlanSwift vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-proest)
- [PlanSwift vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-planswift)
- [PlanSwift vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-planswift)
- [PlanSwift vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-simpro)
- [PlanSwift vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-planswift)
- [PlanSwift vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-planswift)
- [PlanSwift vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-planswift)

  ### 6. [Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/products/bluebeam/reviews)
By Bluebeam
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 461
Bluebeam is the leading provider of digital productivity and collaboration solutions for industries that design and build our world. Trusted by over 3 million users in more than 160 countries, Bluebeam’s solutions empower professionals to make their mark, adapt to change, and deliver projects successfully. Revu is Bluebeam’s flagship product - a powerful, versatile, and easy-to-use desktop application helping professionals communicate clearly, collaborate effectively, and optimize PDF workflows. It increases teams’ productivity with discipline-specific and customizable markup tools, precise measurements set to drawing scale, real-time collaboration on a single source of truth, and process efficiency tools that streamline your workflows. Bluebeam Cloud helps keep projects moving no matter where contributors are. By extending Studio in Revu to your web browser or mobile device, Bluebeam Cloud lets you markup documents and collaborate on Studio Sessions and Projects from anywhere.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Bluebeam is:
- Slower to reach roi
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff), [Autodesk Construction Cloud Integration Partners](https://www.g2.com/categories/autodesk-construction-cloud-integration-partners)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare Bluebeam with other alternatives:**
- [Bluebeam vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-methvin)
- [Bluebeam vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-procore)
- [Bluebeam vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-proest)
- [Bluebeam vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-bluebeam)
- [Bluebeam vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-planswift)
- [Bluebeam vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-simpro)
- [Bluebeam vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-fieldwire-by-hilti)
- [Bluebeam vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-hcss)
- [Bluebeam vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-safetyculturehq)

  ### 7. [Simpro](https://www.g2.com/products/simpro/reviews)
By Simpro
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 456
Simpro is a software solution that develops business management cloud solutions designed to manage workflow, process, productivity, and profitability.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Simpro is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Takeoff](https://www.g2.com/categories/takeoff)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/stack-takeoff-estimate-vs-simpro)
**Compare Simpro with other alternatives:**
- [Simpro vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/procore-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/proest-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/planswift-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-simpro)
- [Simpro vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-simpro)

  ### 8. [Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/products/fieldwire-by-hilti/reviews)
By Fieldwire
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 585
It&#39;s the easiest way for construction foremen, supers, and engineers to share blueprints, files and RFIs without leaving the jobsite.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Fieldwire by Hilti is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Jobsite Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare Fieldwire by Hilti with other alternatives:**
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-methvin)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-procore)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-proest)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-fieldwire-by-hilti)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-planswift)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-fieldwire-by-hilti)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-simpro)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-hcss)
- [Fieldwire by Hilti vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-safetyculturehq)

  ### 9. [HCSS](https://www.g2.com/products/hcss/reviews)
By HCSS
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 257
HCSS is a time entry system designed for foremen that allows you to see daily job costs against the estimate, manage foremen and have them plan ahead, with the ability to work offline or online from any device.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, HCSS is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Better at support
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Construction Estimating](https://www.g2.com/categories/construction-estimating-software), [Jobsite Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare HCSS with other alternatives:**
- [HCSS vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-methvin)
- [HCSS vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-procore)
- [HCSS vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-proest)
- [HCSS vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-hcss)
- [HCSS vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-planswift)
- [HCSS vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-hcss)
- [HCSS vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-simpro)
- [HCSS vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-hcss)
- [HCSS vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-safetyculturehq)

  ### 10. [Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/products/safetyculturehq/reviews)
By Mitti 
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 484
iAuditor is an inspection app used to empower your workers in the field. Combined with the web platform, iAuditor provides visibility and insights to help raise safety and quality standards across an organization. Your team can collect consistent data, standardise operations, send reports, identify failed areas and get problems resolved.


Reviewers say compared to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate, Mitti (by SafetyCulture) is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate: [Jobsite Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/jobsite-management)

**Compare:** [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-stack-takeoff-estimate)
**Compare Mitti (by SafetyCulture) with other alternatives:**
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Methvin](https://www.g2.com/compare/methvin-vs-safetyculturehq)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Procore](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-procore)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs ProEst](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-proest)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)](https://www.g2.com/compare/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud-vs-safetyculturehq)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-planswift)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/compare/bluebeam-vs-safetyculturehq)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Simpro](https://www.g2.com/compare/safetyculturehq-vs-simpro)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/compare/fieldwire-by-hilti-vs-safetyculturehq)
- [Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs HCSS](https://www.g2.com/compare/hcss-vs-safetyculturehq)


---
## STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate Alternatives FAQs

### How does STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate compare to Procore?

According to G2 data, [STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate](https://www.g2.com/products/stack-takeoff-estimate/reviews) holds a 4.4-star average rating from 73 reviews, while [Procore](https://www.g2.com/products/procore/reviews) has a higher 4.6-star average rating across 4,174 reviews, indicating stronger overall user satisfaction for Procore. STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate scores higher in ease of setup (9.1 vs 8.2) and usability (9.0 vs 8.6), reflecting its straightforward initial setup and user-friendly interface. It also leads in support (9.2 vs 9.0) and ease of doing business (9.3 vs 8.8). Conversely, Procore excels in meeting requirements (8.7 vs 8.8, slightly lower) and ease of administration (8.5 vs 8.9), with STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate scoring higher in these dimensions by 0.4 to 0.9 points. Feature-wise, Procore offers additional capabilities such as Safety Compliance and Workforce Scheduling, which STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate does not provide. User feedback highlights STACK&#39;s strengths in ease of use (30 mentions), intuitive design (12 mentions), and efficient setup (10 mentions), while Procore is praised for project management (293 mentions), centralization (266 mentions), and team collaboration (200 mentions). However, Procore users report a steeper learning curve (156 mentions) and complexity (89 mentions) compared to STACK. Both platforms have pros and cons related to missing features and performance, but Procore&#39;s extensive toolset supports complex project management, whereas STACK offers a more streamlined takeoff and estimating experience with cloud-based accessibility and responsive customer support.



### What are the best alternatives to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate?

The best alternatives to STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate include [Procore](https://www.g2.com/products/procore/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 4174 reviews), [Autodesk Forma](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 5381 reviews), and [Methvin](https://www.g2.com/products/methvin/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 105 reviews). Other notable alternatives are [ProEst](https://www.g2.com/products/proest/reviews), [PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/products/planswift/reviews), [Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/products/bluebeam/reviews), [Simpro](https://www.g2.com/products/simpro/reviews), [Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/products/fieldwire-by-hilti/reviews), [HCSS](https://www.g2.com/products/hcss/reviews), and [SafetyCulture](https://www.g2.com/products/safetyculturehq/reviews).



### What features do alternatives offer that STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate does not?

STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate lacks native Safety Compliance and Workforce Scheduling features, which are available in alternatives such as Procore, Autodesk Forma, Methvin, HCSS, and SafetyCulture.



### Which Construction Estimating tools do reviewers recommend instead of STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate?

Reviewers recommend [Procore](https://www.g2.com/products/procore/reviews) for its comprehensive project management, cost management, and collaboration features, with 506 mentions of ease of use and strong customer support. [Autodesk Forma](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-forma-formerly-autodesk-construction-cloud/reviews) is praised for its unified platform connecting workflows and teams, real-time collaboration, and BIM coordination. [Methvin](https://www.g2.com/products/methvin/reviews) is highlighted for its first-principles estimating, integrated lifecycle tools, and real-time collaboration. [ProEst](https://www.g2.com/products/proest/reviews) is valued for its integrated takeoff and estimating capabilities with customizable databases and professional reporting. [PlanSwift](https://www.g2.com/products/planswift/reviews) is noted for its ease of use, accurate takeoffs, and trade-specific plug-ins. [Bluebeam](https://www.g2.com/products/bluebeam/reviews) is favored for powerful PDF markup, real-time collaboration, and efficient document management. [Simpro](https://www.g2.com/products/simpro/reviews) is recommended for its all-in-one business management features including estimating, project management, and invoicing with strong customer support. [Fieldwire by Hilti](https://www.g2.com/products/fieldwire-by-hilti/reviews) is appreciated for its user-friendly interface, plan management, and real-time task tracking. [HCSS](https://www.g2.com/products/hcss/reviews) is praised for its ease of use, comprehensive product suite for heavy construction, and excellent customer support. [SafetyCulture](https://www.g2.com/products/safetyculturehq/reviews) is recognized for its intuitive inspection tools, customizable templates, mobile-first design, and strong reporting and analytics capabilities.



### Why do users choose Procore over STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate?

Users choose [Procore](https://www.g2.com/products/procore/reviews) over STACK Takeoff &amp; Estimate primarily for its comprehensive project management capabilities and centralized platform that integrates documents, communication, scheduling, and financial tracking. Procore&#39;s ability to connect field and office teams in real time, with features like RFIs, submittals, and drawing management, significantly reduces miscommunication and improves collaboration, as reflected in 293 mentions of project management and 266 mentions of centralization. Additionally, Procore&#39;s extensive integrations with third-party apps (161 mentions) and robust training resources, including free certification courses, make it attractive for organizations seeking scalable, all-in-one construction management solutions. Users value Procore&#39;s efficiency improvements (205 mentions) and team collaboration (200 mentions), which align well with complex, large-scale construction projects. The platform&#39;s safety compliance and workforce scheduling features, absent in STACK, also contribute to its preference among users needing comprehensive operational oversight. Overall, Procore is favored for its depth of features, real-time updates, and ability to manage multifaceted construction workflows effectively, making it the preferred choice for users prioritizing integrated project management over specialized takeoff and estimating functions.




## Explore Articles
- [What is the top-rated retail task management tool that integrates with an existing POS system so task triggers and store performance data stay connected in one place?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-top-rated-retail-task-management-tool-that-integrates-with-an-existing-pos-system-so-task-triggers-and-store-performance-data-stay-connected-in-one-place)
- [Best AI software for personalized video production](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-is-the-best-ai-software-for-personalized-video-production)
- [Top-rated tools for certification and compliance assessments](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-rated-tools-for-certification-and-compliance-assessments)
- [Which punch list platforms offer offline functionality and automatic cloud sync?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-punch-list-platforms-offer-offline-functionality-and-automatic-cloud-sync)
- [Which vendor supports offline access to notes across devices?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-vendor-supports-offline-access-to-notes-across-devices)
- [Best software for managing international payrolls](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-software-for-managing-international-payrolls)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Project Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/project-management)
- [Sales Enablement Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/sales-enablement)
- [CMMS Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cmms)

