Secfix Compliance Platform Pricing Overview

This software is very easy to understand and provides excellent guidance on what can be a rather complex topic. The platform is regularly updated with positive improvements. The team at Secfix is always helpful and competent, offering support and assistance whenever I have questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As they are still a startup, there is room for the tool to grow and improve. However, I appreciate how receptive they are to feedback and how quickly they implement changes. This responsiveness gives me a lot of confidence in their potential. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most is the focus on deep, continuous automation and ease of integration. Secfix is clearly built for modern, cloud-native environments. The pre-built integrations with major cloud services (AWS, GCP, Azure), SSO providers, and HRIS platforms are game-changers, automating continuous monitoring checks (public sources mention over 250+ checks for ISO 27001) and evidence collection. This moves compliance from a stressful, quarterly spreadsheet chore to a light, continuous process. The high number of features—especially the automated risk management and centralized, templated policy system—significantly increases the speed and ease of initial implementation. Their customer support and dedicated compliance expert guidance are top-tier, effectively acting as an extension of a small security team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The primary downside lies in integrating custom or niche infrastructure. While the automation is excellent for standard major cloud services and widely adopted SaaS tools, organizations with highly bespoke on-prem environments or proprietary, smaller data centers may find that asset inventory tracking and evidence collection for those specific components revert to manual tasks. This isn't a flaw in the platform's core design, but rather a limitation of focusing on the highest-leverage integrations. For a company that relies heavily on non-standard internal tools or smaller vendors, this gap requires a manual workaround, which slightly impacts the overall ease of integration score compared to the flawless experience with major providers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.