Protecht Pricing Overview

edit

Protecht has not provided pricing information for this product or service. This is common practice for software sellers and service providers. Contact Protecht to obtain current pricing.

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

5 months

Return on Investment

18 months

Average Discount

Perceived Cost

$$$$$

Top-Rated Alternatives

View All Alternatives

Protecht Pricing Reviews

(2)

Laura v.

Operational Risk Analyst

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

12/18/2025

"Effortless Setup and Outstanding Support"

5/5

What do you like best about Protecht?

The platform is straightforward to understand and use, and its modular design allows you to add features as needed. I appreciate that, after a brief training period, users can configure the system themselves. The support teams are exceptionally helpful and friendly, which makes a big difference. Implementing the platform was quick and easy, and rolling it out to the user base was a smooth process.

Our Risk Management staff use the system on a daily basis and found integration seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Protecht?

I can't think of any particular drawbacks. While the help desk being located in Australia can sometimes result in slightly longer response times due to the time difference, issues with the platform are so infrequent that this rarely becomes a problem once you're aware of the time zone difference. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is Protecht solving and how is that benefiting you?

Before implementing Protecht, our company lacked the ability for departments to easily access and analyze their RCSAs, as well as straightforward incident reporting and the ability to define action plans. With Protecht, we now have a much clearer understanding of risk management and its significance. I believe this will continue to improve as additional modules are introduced. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Megan Connell of Protecht

edit

Hi Laura, thanks for the fantastic review.

We are really pleased to hear that you found Protecht straightforward to use and that the modular design has allowed you to roll out capabilities as needed. It is great to know that, after initial training, your teams have been able to confidently configure and use the platform as part of their day-to-day risk management activities.

We also appreciate your feedback on support. We have local support engineers across APAC, EMEA, and North America to provide timely assistance, while development-related requests are coordinated through our Australian-based product and engineering teams. We are glad this approach has worked well for you and that support needs have been minimal once the platform was embedded.

It is encouraging to hear how Protecht has improved access to RCSAs, incident reporting, and action planning across the organisation. We look forward to continuing to support you as you introduce additional modules and further strengthen your risk management practices.

Verified User in Banking

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

12/16/2025

"Empowering Risk Management with Flexibility and Intuitive Design"

4/5

What do you like best about Protecht?

At KCU, we are currently in the implementation phase of Protecht, and the journey so far has been encouraging. The platform’s structured approach to Enterprise Risk Management is helping us establish a strong foundation for identifying and managing risks more effectively. We particularly value its flexibility to support our internal audit processes and vendor risk management, which are critical components of our overall risk framework. Even at this stage, the intuitive interface and customizable features are making it easier for our teams to adapt and align the system with our organizational needs. We anticipate that once fully rolled out, Protecht will streamline collaboration across departments and enhance our ability to turn risk data into actionable insights. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Protecht?

It takes a little bit long for team to develop new form/document based on our template, however, they are doing well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Megan Connell of Protecht

edit

Thank you for sharing your experience and for the thoughtful review, especially during your implementation phase.

We are pleased to hear that Protecht is helping KCU establish a strong foundation for Enterprise Risk Management and that the platform’s structured approach, flexibility, and intuitive design are supporting your internal audit and vendor risk management processes. These are critical areas, and it is encouraging to hear that your teams are already finding it easier to align the system with your organizational needs.

We appreciate your feedback regarding the time required to develop new forms and documents based on templates. Protecht’s configurability is designed to ensure that risk frameworks, documentation, and workflows align closely with each organization’s requirements, and that can require more upfront effort during implementation. We are glad to hear our team is supporting you well through this process, and we continue to invest in tooling, guidance, and automation to help accelerate configuration and reduce time to value.

It is also great to hear that Protecht is helping with automation and documentation, and that you see clear potential for improved collaboration and more actionable risk insights as you move toward full rollout. We look forward to continuing to support you as you expand usage across the organization and realize the full benefits of the platform.

Thank you again for taking the time to share your feedback.