# Top 10 Microsoft Defender for IoT Alternatives &amp; Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 99
If you are considering Microsoft Defender for IoT, you may also want to investigate similar alternatives or competitors to find the best solution. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Microsoft Defender for IoT include security and monitoring. The best overall Microsoft Defender for IoT alternative is AWS IoT Device Defender. Other similar apps like Microsoft Defender for IoT are Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security, Forescout Platform, Armis, and DoveRunner. Microsoft Defender for IoT alternatives can be found in [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions) but may also be in [Zero Trust Networking Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/zero-trust-networking) or [Application Shielding Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/application-shielding).


## Best Paid &amp; Free Alternatives to Microsoft Defender for IoT
  - [AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-iot-device-defender/reviews)
  - [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security/reviews)
  - [Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/forescout-platform/reviews)
  - [Armis](https://www.g2.com/products/armis/reviews)
  - [DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/products/doverunner/reviews)
  - [Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-iot-core/reviews)
  - [AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/products/appgate-ztna/reviews)
  - [Rayven](https://www.g2.com/products/rayven/reviews)
  - [FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/products/fortinac/reviews)
  - [BugProve](https://www.g2.com/products/bugprove/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to Microsoft Defender for IoT Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Microsoft Defender for IoT stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current &amp; previous users in industries like Information Technology and Services, Financial Services, and Consumer Electronics, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-iot-device-defender/reviews)
By Amazon Web Services (AWS)
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 58
AWS IoT Device Defender is a fully managed service that helps you secure your fleet of IoT devices. AWS IoT Device Defender continuously audits the security policies associated with your devices to make sure that they aren&#39;t deviating from security practices.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, AWS IoT Device Defender is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to do business with
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare AWS IoT Device Defender with other alternatives:**
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-forescout-platform)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-armis)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-doverunner)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-appgate-ztna)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-rayven)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-fortinac)
- [AWS IoT Device Defender vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-bugprove)

  ### 2. [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security/reviews)
By Palo Alto Networks
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 119
Protect every connected asset with OT security that keeps operations up 24/7, not CISOs


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security is:
- More expensive
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [OT Security Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ot-security-tools), [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-defender-for-iot-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
**Compare Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security with other alternatives:**
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-iot-core-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security-vs-rayven)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)

  ### 3. [Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/forescout-platform/reviews)
By Forescout Technologies
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 17
The Forescout Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to provide real-time visibility, control, and compliance across all connected devices within an organization&#39;s network. It continuously identifies and protects both managed and unmanaged assets—including IT, IoT, IoMT, and OT devices—without disrupting business operations. By delivering capabilities in network security, risk and exposure management, and extended detection and response, the platform enables organizations to effectively manage cyber risks and mitigate threats. Key Features and Functionality: - Device Classification: Utilizes real-time, agentless discovery and classification of all connected devices, encompassing traditional IT, IoT, IoMT, and OT/ICS assets. - Policy Enforcement: Identifies compliance and security posture gaps, leveraging a centralized policy engine to reduce exposure risks and align with organizational security frameworks. - Cybersecurity Automation: Facilitates automated, policy-based security controls to proactively and reactively manage threats, minimizing incident response times through coordinated actions. - Analytics: Provides rich, contextual visualizations through persona-based dashboards, offering insights into risks, threats, behaviors, and compliance statuses. - Ecosystem Integration: Enhances existing security investments by dynamically sharing device identity, configuration state, risk attributes, and threat context with other security tools. Primary Value and Problem Solved: The Forescout Platform addresses the critical challenge of securing diverse and expanding networks by providing continuous, agentless visibility and control over all connected devices. It enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, enforce security policies, and automate threat responses without disrupting business operations. By integrating seamlessly with existing security infrastructures, the platform enhances overall cybersecurity posture, reduces risk exposure, and ensures compliance across complex IT, IoT, IoMT, and OT environments.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, Forescout Platform is:
- More usable
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [OT Security Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ot-security-tools), [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare Forescout Platform with other alternatives:**
- [Forescout Platform vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-forescout-platform)
- [Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Forescout Platform vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-forescout-platform)
- [Forescout Platform vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-forescout-platform)
- [Forescout Platform vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Forescout Platform vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-forescout-platform)
- [Forescout Platform vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-rayven)
- [Forescout Platform vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-fortinac)
- [Forescout Platform vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-forescout-platform)

  ### 4. [Armis](https://www.g2.com/products/armis/reviews)
By Armis Security
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 13
Armis Centrix™, the Armis cyber exposure management platform, is powered by the Armis AI-driven Asset Intelligence Engine, which sees, secures, protects and manages billions of assets around the world in real time. Armis Centrix ™ is a seamless, frictionless, cloud-based platform that proactively mitigates all cyber asset risks, remediates vulnerabilities, blocks threats and protects your entire attack surface. Armis Centrix ™ gives organizations peace of mind, knowing that all critical assets are protected 24/7 by the industry’s #1 asset intelligence cybersecurity company. Only Armis Centrix ™ protects all verticals and industries including Manufacturing, Health and Medical, Information Technology, Energy and Utilities, Financial Services, Transportation, Telecommunications and Media, Public Sector and many more.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, Armis is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [OT Security Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ot-security-tools), [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare Armis with other alternatives:**
- [Armis vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-armis)
- [Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Armis vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-forescout-platform)
- [Armis vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-doverunner)
- [Armis vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Armis vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-armis)
- [Armis vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-rayven)
- [Armis vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-fortinac)
- [Armis vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-bugprove)

  ### 5. [DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/products/doverunner/reviews)
By  DoveRunner
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 52
DoveRunner is a trusted player in the world of mobile application security. In today’s application-focused world, security can’t slow down your speed of development. We utilize runtime application self-protection features to build scalable security solutions for your mobile apps business in quick time without &#39;ANY CODING&#39;. Our powerful security suite ensures real-time in-depth application security like source code protection, anti-reverse engineering, cheat tool &amp; emulator detection/blocking, and enforces app integrity. It protects 800+ mobile apps and 800 million+ devices, successfully blocking 70 million+ threats across the globe. Our esteemed clientele spans across Gaming, Fintech, Movie apps, E-comm, Healthcare, and O2o.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, DoveRunner is:
- More usable
- Easier to set up
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare DoveRunner with other alternatives:**
- [DoveRunner vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-doverunner)
- [DoveRunner vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [DoveRunner vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-forescout-platform)
- [DoveRunner vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-doverunner)
- [DoveRunner vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [DoveRunner vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-doverunner)
- [DoveRunner vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-rayven)
- [DoveRunner vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-fortinac)
- [DoveRunner vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-doverunner)

  ### 6. [Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-iot-core/reviews)
By Google
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 30
Google Cloud IoT Core is a fully managed service that allows users to easily and securely connect, manage, and ingest data from millions of globally dispersed devices.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, Google Cloud IoT Core is:
- Easier to admin
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-iot-core-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare Google Cloud IoT Core with other alternatives:**
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-iot-core-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-iot-core-vs-rayven)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [Google Cloud IoT Core vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)

  ### 7. [AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/products/appgate-ztna/reviews)
By Appgate
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 38
AppGate ZTNA secures the network with a Software-Defined Perimeter&#39;s network security model that dynamically creates one-to-one network connections between the user and the resources they access.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, AppGate ZTNA is:
- Easier to admin
- Easier to do business with
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare AppGate ZTNA with other alternatives:**
- [AppGate ZTNA vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-appgate-ztna)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-forescout-platform)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-armis)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-doverunner)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-rayven)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-fortinac)
- [AppGate ZTNA vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-bugprove)

  ### 8. [Rayven](https://www.g2.com/products/rayven/reviews)
By Rayven
**Average Rating:** 4.9/5
**Total Reviews:** 29
No/low/full-code platform for building apps, AI tools + automations. Rayven enables you to integrate systems, unlock data sources, and build custom apps with business-orientated AI capabilities, simply.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, Rayven is:
- Easier to set up
- Better at meeting requirements
- Better at support
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-defender-for-iot-vs-rayven)
**Compare Rayven with other alternatives:**
- [Rayven vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-iot-core-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-rayven)
- [Rayven vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-rayven)

  ### 9. [FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/products/fortinac/reviews)
By Fortinet
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 20
FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, FortiNAC is:
- Easier to admin
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare FortiNAC with other alternatives:**
- [FortiNAC vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-fortinac)
- [FortiNAC vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [FortiNAC vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/forescout-platform-vs-fortinac)
- [FortiNAC vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-fortinac)
- [FortiNAC vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/doverunner-vs-fortinac)
- [FortiNAC vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [FortiNAC vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-fortinac)
- [FortiNAC vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/fortinac-vs-rayven)
- [FortiNAC vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-fortinac)

  ### 10. [BugProve](https://www.g2.com/products/bugprove/reviews)
By BugProve
**Average Rating:** 4.9/5
**Total Reviews:** 20
We founded BugProve to deliver the level of security that IoT deserves! The surge of new technology brings new challenges and risks but carries great opportunities to solve them as well. Our automated 0-day detection tool helps security engineers to keep their focus on truly difficult issues with a built-in dashboard and easy-to-use reports. Integration of our tool into the CI/CD pipeline leads to efficient IT security management right through the production funnel. Security posture is also future-proofed by our lifelong monitoring and alert service, newly discovered threats and vulnerabilities are flagged right away, giving your engineers peace of mind. No source code is required, all checks run on the firmware: - concolic and advanced static analysis - unique multi-binary taint analysis - cryptographic analysis - hardening device weaknesses - vulnerability remediation Too good to be true? See it for yourself with our accessible freemium version!


Reviewers say compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, BugProve is:
- Easier to set up
- Easier to admin
- More usable
Categories in common with Microsoft Defender for IoT: [IoT Security Solutions](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-security-solutions)

**Compare:** [Microsoft Defender for IoT vs BugProve](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-microsoft-defender-for-iot)
**Compare BugProve with other alternatives:**
- [BugProve vs AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-iot-device-defender-vs-bugprove)
- [BugProve vs Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security)
- [BugProve vs Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-forescout-platform)
- [BugProve vs Armis](https://www.g2.com/compare/armis-vs-bugprove)
- [BugProve vs DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-doverunner)
- [BugProve vs Google Cloud IoT Core](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-google-cloud-iot-core)
- [BugProve vs AppGate ZTNA](https://www.g2.com/compare/appgate-ztna-vs-bugprove)
- [BugProve vs Rayven](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-rayven)
- [BugProve vs FortiNAC](https://www.g2.com/compare/bugprove-vs-fortinac)


---
## Microsoft Defender for IoT Alternatives FAQs

### What features do alternatives offer that Microsoft Defender for IoT does not?

Microsoft Defender for IoT lacks advanced AI-driven device discovery and profiling, seamless integration with next-generation firewalls for automated policy enforcement, and comprehensive runtime application self-protection features for mobile apps.



### What are the best alternatives to Microsoft Defender for IoT?

The best alternatives to Microsoft Defender for IoT include [AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-iot-device-defender/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 58 reviews), [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 117 reviews), [Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/forescout-platform/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 17 reviews), and [DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/products/doverunner/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 52 reviews). These alternatives excel in areas such as ease of administration, support, meeting requirements, usability, and setup.



### Which IoT Security Solutions tools do reviewers recommend instead of Microsoft Defender for IoT?

Reviewers recommend [AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-iot-device-defender/reviews) for its continuous security monitoring, anomaly detection, and ease of use. [Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-iot-ot-security/reviews) is favored for its AI-driven device discovery, comprehensive threat prevention, Zero Trust enforcement, and seamless integration with existing firewalls. [Forescout Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/forescout-platform/reviews) is praised for its real-time, agentless visibility, policy enforcement, and automation capabilities across diverse device types. [DoveRunner](https://www.g2.com/products/doverunner/reviews) is recommended for mobile application security with features like runtime application self-protection, anti-reverse engineering, and ease of implementation without coding.



### How does Microsoft Defender for IoT compare to AWS IoT Device Defender?

According to G2 data, [Microsoft Defender for IoT](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-defender-for-iot/reviews) holds an average rating of 4.3/5 from 99 reviews, while [AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-iot-device-defender/reviews) has a slightly higher average rating of 4.4/5 from 58 reviews. AWS IoT Device Defender scores higher on meeting requirements (9.1 vs 8.4), ease of setup (8.6 vs 8.1), ease of administration (8.4 vs 8.2), support (8.6 vs 8.3), and ease of doing business (9.1 vs 8.6). Conversely, Microsoft Defender for IoT scores higher on usability (8.4 vs 7.9). Users praise Microsoft Defender for IoT for its agentless deployment, deep packet inspection, automatic network topology mapping, and seamless integration with Microsoft Sentinel and Azure, enabling comprehensive IoT and OT security. AWS IoT Device Defender is recognized for its security monitoring, policy-based alerts, and real-time anomaly detection, providing good visibility into device compliance and security risks, with a simpler management experience for smaller-scale use cases. Overall, AWS IoT Device Defender offers stronger scores in key usability and business dimensions, while Microsoft Defender for IoT excels in integration and deep network visibility features.



### Why do users choose AWS IoT Device Defender over Microsoft Defender for IoT?

Users choose [AWS IoT Device Defender](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-iot-device-defender/reviews) over Microsoft Defender for IoT primarily due to its higher scores in meeting requirements (9.1 vs 8.4), ease of setup (8.6 vs 8.1), ease of administration (8.4 vs 8.2), better support (8.6 vs 8.3), and easier business interactions (9.1 vs 8.6) as reported on G2. AWS IoT Device Defender provides straightforward security monitoring with policy-based alerts that effectively identify abnormal device behavior and compliance issues, making it easier to manage especially for teams newer to IoT security. Its real-time alerts and fully managed cloud audit service simplify anomaly detection and risk mitigation. These factors contribute to user preference for AWS IoT Device Defender when prioritizing ease of use, faster deployment, and responsive support over the more complex setup and higher cost associated with Microsoft Defender for IoT.




## Explore Articles
- [What are the highest-rated financial data APIs for engineering teams needing reliable market feeds without vendor lock-in?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-highest-rated-financial-data-apis-for-engineering-teams-needing-reliable-market-feeds-without-vendor-lock-in)
- [Top-rated CI platforms for enterprise development teams](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-rated-ci-platforms-for-enterprise-development-teams)
- [Top-rated intent data platforms for sales enablement](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-rated-intent-data-platforms-for-sales-enablement)
- [Employee communications platforms](https://www.g2.com/discussions/employee-communications-platforms-need-help-choosing-a-solution-advice-needed)
- [Which company offers the best applicant tracking system](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-company-offers-the-best-applicant-tracking-system)
- [Google Cloud BigQuery reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-bigquery/reviews)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Conversation Intelligence Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/conversation-intelligence)
- [Generative AI Infrastructure Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/generative-ai-infrastructure)
- [Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring Tools and Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-infrastructure-monitoring)

