# Submittable vs Bloomerang CRM: which is the highest rated grant management platform for organizations scaling operations while improving productivity and team satisfaction?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi G2 users, Submittable vs Bloomerang CRM keeps coming up in <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/grant-management">grant management</a> comparisons when organizations are scaling operations while improving productivity and team satisfaction, and I've been trying to understand what actually separates them at that stage. Both have strong review bases. Both serve overlapping audiences. The question is which one delivers the productivity and satisfaction gains that matter when a team is actively growing.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/submittable/reviews"><strong>Submittable</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Customizable forms without IT involvement; centralizes application submissions and eliminates random emails; cross-team communication built in; setup described as matching existing processes for a smoother rollout. Does the platform scale cleanly as grant program volume grows, or are there workflow configuration limits that surface once submission counts increase significantly?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bloomerang-crm/reviews"><strong>Bloomerang CRM</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Non-technical team members navigate it easily; reporting interface straightforward enough that team members write their own reports; API access for connecting to finance and student information systems; saves approximately $10K per year versus more complex CRMs for mid-market organizations.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/good-grants/reviews"><strong>Good Grants</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Structured workflow for applications, assessment, scoring, and approvals; consistent assessment criteria across applicants; handles scale with many applicants, multiple assessors, and staged review processes. Worth including as a third option specifically on the scaling question since it was designed for growing grantmaking operations.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews"><strong>Submit.com</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Granular permissions with applicants, reviewers, and administrators each seeing only what's relevant to their role; automation cuts administrative time by more than half; real-time dashboards for instant visibility across all programs simultaneously.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/instrumentl/reviews"><strong>Instrumentl</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Curates grant opportunities to organization-set preferences; saves significant time on research; everything in one place for tracking from discovery through submission.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For organizations that have used both Submittable and Bloomerang CRM: which one had a clearer positive impact on team productivity, and was it the feature depth or the interface design that made the difference?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Submittable and Bloomerang are solving different scaling problems. Submittable scales submission volume. Bloomerang scales donor relationship complexity. Good Grants is actually the more direct answer for scaling grantmaking operations specifically, which is what the question is really asking about.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4