# Opentext functional Testing Reviews **Vendor:** OpenText **Category:** [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) **Average Rating:** 4.2/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 46 ## About Opentext functional Testing Test automation to make manual testing more efficient and let developers and testers collaborate. ## Opentext functional Testing Reviews ### 1. "UFT ONE" is one of the best automation tool in the Globe. **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 27, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Micro Focus UFT One is a powerful and feature-rich test automation tool that excels in its support for diverse technologies and robust object recognition. While it may have a learning curve and could be considered pricey, its capabilities make it a compelling choice for teams seeking a comprehensive solution for their test automation needs. Versatility: UFT One supports a wide range of technologies, including web, mobile, desktop, and API testing, making it suitable for testing diverse applications. Keyword-Driven Testing: The tool's keyword-driven approach allows for easier collaboration between technical and non-technical team members, facilitating efficient test script creation and maintenance. Object Recognition: UFT One boasts strong object recognition capabilities, adapting well to changes in the application's UI elements, leading to stable and reliable automated tests. Integrated Development Environment (IDE): The user-friendly IDE simplifies the process of creating, organizing, and executing test scripts. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** High Licensing Costs: Some users may find the licensing costs associated with UFT One to be relatively high, which could be a concern for teams with budget constraints. Learning Curve: Beginners might experience a steep learning curve, especially if they are new to test automation concepts. This could impact the tool's ease of adoption. Resource Intensive: UFT One can be resource-intensive, requiring a significant amount of system resources, which may impact the performance of the testing environment. Limited Cross-Browser Testing Support: While UFT One supports various technologies, its support for cross-browser testing may not be as extensive as some other specialized tools in the market. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** UFT ONE support almost all the platforms that are present in the market and for SFDC automation it is one the best tool as i consider due to clean integration process. ### 2. UFT One one of best Automation tool in the market **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 27, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Unified Functional Testing (UFT) One by Micro Focus is a comprehensive test automation tool primarily used for functional and regression testing. It supports a variety of technologies, including web, mobile, and desktop applications. Pros: Cross-platform Testing: UFT One supports testing across different platforms, making it versatile for various application types. Object Recognition: Its object recognition capabilities are robust, aiding in the identification and manipulation of diverse UI elements. Keyword-Driven Framework: The tool supports keyword-driven testing, enabling testers with varying technical expertise to participate in test automation. Integration with ALM: Seamless integration with Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) streamlines test management processes. Extensive Protocol Support: UFT One supports multiple protocols, making it suitable for testing a wide range of applications, from traditional desktop to modern web and mobile. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Resource Intensive: UFT One can be resource-intensive, especially for large test suites, leading to longer execution times. Cost: The licensing cost can be relatively high, which might be a concern for smaller teams or organizations with budget constraints. Learning Curve: It may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, particularly those new to automated testing or scripting. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** It helped me to Automate Power builder application. Covered Regression test suite and Smoke test suite using this. ### 3. MicroFocus UFT Review **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Rohit S. | Tech Analyst, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 23, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The best part about using UFT was the ease and range of things which can be automated with UFT. This AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Price comparable is sometimes not up to the mark. Also helping community is also not upto the mark **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing (UFT) One accelerates and simplifies end-to-end functional testing with one intelligent solution that builds and automates tests for mobile, web and desktop enterprise apps using embedded AI-based capabilities. ### 4. Happy to came across Micro Focus UFT One #Satisfied user **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Shreya Z. | Quality Assurance Analyst, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 22, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Comprehensive Testing Capabilities, Object Recognition and Repository, Integration Capabilities, Support for Multiple Technologies like Java, .NET, SAP. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** can be resource-intensive, especially when dealing with large test suites for complex applications. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Its strengths in object recognition, integration capabilities, and support for multiple technologies make it a valuable asset for test automation. ### 5. UFT_Everywhere **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Aditya G. | Test Engineer, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 20, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Who is having minimum (basic ) knowledge on programming (VB script) they can work efficiently. It's easy to learn and adopt. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Sometimes its may be difficult to understand scenario whose having minimum knowledge on Webseries. Not supporting OOPS likes java **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Micro focud UFT one help us to automate Desktop base APK and also its will help in identifying object more naturally ### 6. Best available tool for the functional and automation testing for different applications **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Lalit P. | Test Engineer, Airlines/Aviation, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 19, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Can be integrated with multiple tools especialy the test management tools **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Still focussing on the legacy applications and further can provide the open source functionalities to use as part of CD. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Solving the automation needs of users abd consultants with best availabel support Cost based licence users - with node individual server and concurrent multiple users feasibility available ### 7. Microfocus UFT one **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Raghavendra S. | Software Consultant, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 22, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The platform compiled with AI intergeration which makes testing faster and smooth also this help developers to perform the functional testing **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Data sheet to evaluate the test likes very much **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** AI implementation makes the more intelligible tool which makes the testing smooth and error free ### 8. An overview for Microfocus UFT one **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Capital Markets | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 23, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** As we have many tools overall, this seems unique and an added AI powered functional testing. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** I don't find anuthing as such. But I suggest UI can be improved a bit for more userfriendly. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** We can cover all types of testing taht normally we test i software and it has value added features like integrating with pipelines and AI powered. ### 9. amazing app for automation **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** September 08, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The recording feature of the UFT helps to capture all the steps of a functionality and directly convert that to an automation script which can be used directly with minimal changes **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** running long scripts take too much to execute and may cause hang when doing multi tasking **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Helping automate the manual testing thereby reducing manual efforts and helping in cost reduction. It helps to perform regression testing leading to reduced human efforts and also helps CLIENT satisfaction. ### 10. Better support for testing front end **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 10, 2022 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Easier to download and install Compatible with windows, desktop and web applications using pluggins Most secure with encryption features Reports available to view and debug the issues Can be integrated with ALM to track and fix bugs and execute the tests **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Costly compared to open source tools available for the same applications compatibility Can not support object supports for classes and functions Sometimes difficult to write tests for testers not having information on web based services. API testing cannot be much customized in uft one. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Solving the user end testing by keeping simple algorithms Tests by be configured based on different framework needs Testing strategy can be changed as per the requirement Different plugins to run different applications in a single test suite ### 11. Micro Focus UFT automation for desktop application **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Hospital & Health Care | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 26, 2022 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Micro Focus UFT one helps in automating desktop based applications and also helpful in implementing BDD framework with the use of cucumber and selenium. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Selenium cannot be used for desktop based applications but UFT one makes it possible. The complexity of setting up the framework is high as we will be using selenium and cucumber for this. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** It is helping in implementing BDD automation using selenium for desktop based applications. ### 12. Finest Automation tool for Windows Applications **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Charan Raj Y. | QA Automation Engineer, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 22, 2021 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The best part of HP UFT is Windows application automation is the very frequently used one It uses VB scripting, so very less programming people also can work on this. It supports Windows, Web, Mobile and API automation of applications **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Nothing to say dislike Should be reasonable price for limited usage of modules like if user wants only windows automation it should allow only windows application automation, accordingly they should charge the price **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** I strongly recommend, who wants to automate Thier applications like Windows, Web, Mobile API all using one automation tool, then UFT is the best one **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Using HP UFT, I have automated Windows and Web applications Also it can be easily integrated with HP ALM for test management I have used for Smoke and regression testing of my applications ### 13. UFT Reivew **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 04, 2020 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** We use UFT for test automation and for the reason it's very good! **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It stops suddenly at some point, but it could also be because of our test environment. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** I like UFT because it covers all my needs and is easy to use **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Create, maintain, and run automation scripts in our test environment ### 14. Automation testers heaven **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Pranjal S. | Senior Quality Engineer , Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** September 15, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** UFT or QTP is a tool which is in the market from quite a long time now, and Micro focus has improved it a lot lately. Best ting about the tool is - You get complete testing tools package, you don't need to run behind bunch of tools to perform your end to end testing - Dedicated support team, which is quite frankly very effective - Developers forum usually gives most of the answers in short span of time - Ease of use, and easy to understand the VB scripting makes it available to wide range of people - You can perform GUI, API and Web testing, and provides bunch of tools to facilitate testing tasks - Huge developer base, hence easy for any company to adopt the tool **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** -Since UFT has everything integrated in one tool, it become very heavy application -Only supports VB scripting (and Java script through code injection) - Costly license -Limited to windows based OS **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** If looking for an easy automation tool which can be implemented and executed easily then this the tool you are looking for, only ting need to be analyse is the cost effectiveness since the tools license is bit costly **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** -We can automate any windows based application, be it GUI, API or Web -It helps to reduce automation creation and execution time -It can make modular the framework using action and Function/, which helps to reuse of the code and also make the framework easy to understand. ### 15. The All-In-One Automation tool **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 28, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** I started using UFT when it was a part of HP and started with 11.5 version. The best part about using UFT was the ease and range of things which can be automated with UFT. The initial part of learning UFT is not so hard as you get a record and playback option which will record all your manual intervention with the application under test and will provide you with a script to play which is simple to understand as it uses VB Scripting as a language part. Once you are comfortable with VB Script and recording part you can start writing your own custom codes to achieve the requirements. It supports Web, Windows, Java application which I used during the course in working with UFT. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** The only thing which I hate the most about UFT is the resource consumption. Normally UFT will work with a 4Gb ram desktop/laptop but i'll recommend you to go with minimum 8Gb configuration else you won't be getting the best of performance from the tool and there are chances that it will crash at some point of time. The next big issue in my opinion is the pricing point which most of the projects cannot afford. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** If you are not sure whether this is the right tool for you, one can download and use the trial version of 30days. Rest all is written in multiple blogs/posts about the comparison with different tools but I'll suggest to go with self exploration **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Well to be honest in my course of working with UFT we had automated our web application for the client and some of the benefits i would like to include is as below. 1. Use can use this tool either with Angular JS web application without any issue which is sort of drawback for Selenium tool 2. The object repository concept which helps us store webelement/objects property in a common repository and can be shared with team members is a must functionality i look for in any automation tool 3. The last and my favorite is the ease with which you get to work with VBScripting ### 16. Automated functional Testing made Easier - UFT **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** September 27, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.With a simple record and playback approach , UFT develops regression and functional test cases. 2.Both technical and non technical users can use UFT. 3.It works only multiple interfaces like SAP , Web, Silverlight , Mobile , Oracle etc. based on the interfaces selected by user. 4.It can be integrated with test management tools like HP ALM, Test Director , Winrunner etc. 5.Enables test reporting for analysis. 6.Allows easy maintenance of test cases. 7.Excellent object identification mechanism. 8.Supports XML. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.Cost of QTP is high. 2.Cannot run multiple instances- Does not support multithreading. 3.Performance is slow compared to selenium - Takes loads of RAM and CPU 4.All Addins are not free of cost . Few addins need to be purchased - Java, Oracle, Siebel 5.Supports limited versions of browsers **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** On the whole , UFT is a good tool to incorporate into any project. Since all kinds of frameworks can be worked with , this tool serves its purpose **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** 1.We are using UFT for functional testing where we follow a data driven aproach in automating SAP applications. 2.We use UFT not only for SAP but also for Web applications. 3.It uses VB script and not very high level programming language , making scripting easier ### 17. Key word Driven automation using UFT 12.01 **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 08, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1)Key word driven framework setup using vb script and excel file for automating application 2)Object repository feature on UFT with smart identification features 2)Imaged based object recognition and virtual object creation. 3)User friendly IDE for writing your code 4)VB script programming used for automation is very easy to start with. 5)Execution without opening UFT using batch file. 6)Various Addin support for different types of application based on technology. 7)Inbuilt worksheet for adding data and using for testing application for data driven testing. 8)Support to API testing 9)User defined object identification 10)Reports are very informative and can be converted to various format. 11)Repository merging feature is very good. 12)HP support team is very helpful in resolving issues 13).NET spy feature is very useful to get in depth property of objects. 14)Support to different browser. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** 1)Cloud based automation triggering to automation suite 2)Support to CI/CD integration 3)Sometime failed to identify silver light object in spite of using silver light add in. 4) Performance is not good for some application and some times get hang and get crashed abruptly. 5)Not supporting object oriented programming languages like Java,C# etc. 6)License is expensive **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** License cost is bit on the higher side **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Support to web and desktop application in a single flow ### 18. Silverlight Windows application automation **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 07, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1)Object repository feature on UFT 2)Imaged based object recognition . 3)Very easy programming language to start automating application. 4)VB script programming used for automation is very user friendly and easy to start with. 5)RO property feature to get run time object properties for validation. 6)Various addin available for different types of application based on technology. 7)Inbuilt worksheet for adding data and using for testing application for data driven testing. 8)Support to API testing 9)User defined object identification 10)Reports are very informative and can be converted to various format. 11)Repository merging feature is very good. 12)Support to xml and xls files for integration **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** 1)Not supporting object oriented programming languages like Java,C# etc. 2) Performance is not good for some application and some times get hang and get crashed abruptly. 3)Sometime failed to identify silver light object in spite of using silver light add in. 4)Cloud based automation triggering to automation suite **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** support to Object oriented programming languages **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Silverlight application automation which was difficult with other tools was resolved using UFT. ### 19. Excellent tool in automation! **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Patrícia P. | QA Automation Engineer, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 23, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** I have been working with this tool, for more than 1 year, to automate test cases of various management applications of a reputed company. The range of compatible applications is surprendent and quite useful. UFT provides add-ins so you can implement tests for various technologies such as SAP, WEB, Windows applications, console, among others. The tool is very simple and easy to interact with. Although I did not have previous experience, I easily learned how to use it. In each solution created (known as test) we can create actions, with its own set of input parameters - data passed by the user to be used in the test. Within the test, there may be several actions and these can be easily organized and ordered among themselves. If there are actions that are common to several tests, these can be invoked as external actions and thus, it is not necessary to repeat the source code that has been implemented previously, making the process simpler and faster. In addition, you can create libraries where there can be multiple functions that are called within each test. UFT also provides the "record" option that automatically generates the source code for the execution of the test, such as the action of clicking a certain button: objects are automatically stored in the repository and the code indicating the button click is generated. Another feature is the reports generated at the end of each test. They accurately indicate all the steps in the test and whether they were successful or not. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Despite its great potential, this tool consumes a huge amout of resources. Even with a good processor, RAM and SSD, running tests with more than 3 add-ins makes the machine too slow and difficult to work with. During the use, I came across a major limitation that even the support team couldn't help me: massive export of tests (solutions). The client had to move the tests from one location to another within their server. In order to do this, we use the "export" functionality of UFT, which forces us to open each test and select this option and specify the destination folder. By doing this, all links and references to external libraries and actions ceased to function. The only solution was to open each test and fix the various connections, for a total of 5000 tests! This tool is suitable for large companies, however, it is little prepared to massive changes of items, which is a serious problem in large companies. The licenses of this tool are very expensive, which limits the small and medium companies to use it. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** It is an excellent tool, but you need a good machine to use it. Care should be taken to change the location of the implementations. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** The UFT allows you to create a set of tests. Each test execute a specific test case, with routines of a set of actions, to be executed in several technologies used in the management and exercise of activity of several companies, like SAP, Windows applications, Web, among others. It is possible to run these tests automatically, with various inputs and thus, test the applications used in companies daily, to verify and validate if they behave as expected. It is a way of validating that the whole process of company management is fully functional. ### 20. Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing for Automation testing! **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Education Management | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 25, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** It has best Grafical User interface and it is very easily understandable , It has lot of feature like Record and Play back . It can be used for mobile applications and main frame applications and so much of options are available **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is very expensive and it takes so much of time to load. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** I recommend this tool because it is best tool in the market for the automation purposes but it is very expensive. It has lots of features like Record and play ! etc **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** We used this Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing for automation purposes and we write script for the automations and used to execute the scripts and Ideal for automation of all the web applications. ### 21. Micro Focus UFT **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Utilities | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 15, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** UFT supports VB scripting and it has wide support for automating many different UIs and applications. It all comes with different plugins. Record and play is the very easy and simple method to use with UFT but usually we use the recording option at the base level and integrate that code with our automation framework. It has very good integration with Mocro Focus ALM and so the test and defect management are very easy.It can also integrate with GIT for version control. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** UFT always requires some framework to be developed which sometimes makes it more complex. It supports only VB Scripting and so there are many limitations in coding. The object repository management is also not that good. UFT sometimes hang or show many issues in normal use. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Very useful tool for end to end test automation of ERP solutions like SAP, Oracle etc. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** End to end test automation for SAP and its integrated systems. UFT is very helpful in multi software environment especially with ERP solutions like SAP. It can also use for API testing. ### 22. The best test automation tool but it should be more efficient **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Nelson P. | Senior QA Automation Engineer, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 24, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Micro Focus UFT is a very good software for test automation because it handles different types of software, is simple to use and It's easily integrated with ALM and Jenkins. The record works really good and most of the time, is very useful. For test scenarios that require multiple executions with different data for each execution Micro Focus UFT is the best choice. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** The license is too expensive. It should be able to use other programming languages instead of only VBScript. It's not efficient, I am using Micro Focus UFT on a reasonable good laptop with an Intel i7 8Gen, 16Gb of ram and most of the time it runs slow when executing tests. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** It's one of the best products for test automation in the market. If you are looking for a product that has a really good support this is the product that you are looking for. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am using Micro Focus UFT to test an API with putty by SSH. UFT is very useful because it is probably the only one that can pick up the coordinates of a putty session with the Record option and this turns my work much more easier. ### 23. Good Idea, bad execution **Rating:** 0.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Food & Beverages | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 25, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The Idea behind it that people with almost no programming skill can write tests. Thats it. Every other aspect of this product is bad. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** This product is highly frustrating to work with. It all feels static and slow. There are a handful of features but almost all of them did not work when released and most still do not work properly and crash the whole application from time to time. That is the biggest problem. Constant errors with no hint to what caused the problem, random crashes where no message is shown and all unsaved work is lost. Working with ALM and UFT together is highly problematic. Having two programs, one acting as the structural component and the other as the development component only works if there is a high frequency of communication between the two. There is not. Having the same functions in some parts like check-in and check-out mechanisms makes this important. The two programs sync every hour once. Yes, once. That means when UFT crashes, which it does, a lot, you will have to manually have an admin unlock it or wait up to an hour. Furthermore is the framework limited. There are many Elements UFT understands but a lot of things have to be done by work-around, this defeats the purpose of having a product that can be handled by people with little know how. To add to the disaster, the actual performance is excruciatingly bad. This product is used in my company for test automation and is by far the slowest scripted UI I have ever seen, and because of all the problems, working with it, I always thought: “why don’t we just code the test?” The only reason not to use other UI-drivers and automation through coding would have been usability. Small tests that consist of maybe 5 clicks a dropdown and one edit are manageable. Anything more complex will not work properly and falsify test outcomes due to errors occurring randomly. Since HPE couldn’t realize this, I can only conclude that this product has no use for test automation. This product will slowly fade away until UFT realizes that they should stop announcing new features when the base product isn’t even finished. Do not buy this. It will only cost you money and drive your employees mad. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Do not buy this. Don't let the good idea fool you. This product is unfinished and full of errors. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Test Automation, Process automation and management of said processes. ### 24. Unified Functional Testing is a Best Automation Tool **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Rajesh C. | infra solution engineer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 17, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The Automatic recording of tests as you are navigating around the application.it is also generate VB Script in Background Automatically. we can test Web Application,Mobile Application and Desktop application .it is a simple user interface.we can use the script reusable in your tests. it supports all type of database checkpoints. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** So far i have nothing that i dislike about UFT .it takes lot of memory while recording the application and cost is more expensive . **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** it will save your lot of time and money .This is the best solution for all your test automation. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** we are using for finding the bugs in applications, it allows finding the more bugs in the application during the test.it easy to create all the keywords ,checkpoints etc..it allows to different types recording in a test in the application . ### 25. Best Rider for Testers **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** October 19, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.techie friendly, 2.very efficient, 3.have solution for complex things 4.integration part is minimal(test managing tools) 5.easy to setup(made one-click setup) 6.comes with vb script. 7.great in performance. 8.meets any kind of application **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.still they can optimize the things in a lot of places. 2. The add-ins part is a bit awful. 3.need to make any lighter version **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** as the product is costly but it will not disappoint you. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** good at regression, the integration part ### 26. UFT for functional automation **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** January 02, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1)Easy to use 2) Very helpful for beginners also for QA automation 3) Gives us Record and Play back, can be used by freshers 4) It uses VB Scripting which is again a very simple coding language. 5) I liked the inbuilt checkpoints feature and also Object Repository. 6) Results viewer is again a super tool for UFT results analysis 7) We can also record an execution of the script using 'Mirco Player' and save it for future purposes,which i have used for delivering script/execution demos team. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is slow if we have to load all the add in's from Add In manager while launching UFT. Also it crashes sometimes when working on IE browser and results wont be generated alteast till the point where the script has been crashed giving me hard time to go back and rerun the entire script again especially if i have to run over 100 test cases per execution :( Also this is a licensed tool. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** If your organisation can afford for licensing this is a very good tool for Functional testing automation. Easy to use with all inbuilt features like checkpoints, Object repository , data tables, reports, functional libraries, reusing actions etc. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** This was my first QA automation tool which i have learned and used to build over 400+ regression test cases automation. Results sharing is very easy to the higher management by sharing the charts from results viewer, Micro Player can be used to record script execution and save for demo purposes or future references to train new joiners etc. ### 27. "really worthful and bestest automation tool ever" **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Yadav Anant S. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** it can perform multiple tests simultaneously, we can change test, debug tests and manage parameters.It allows running distributed tests on multiple machines.The versatility of it means it is also used to load data for the training department to use thus speeding up their work too. Without a robust automation suite, businesses would not be competitive in this day and age and for me, UFT helps to fulfill that need with ease. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is a bit slow and acts erratically.Not a good support from hp for any issue.a lot CPU utilization which makes the performance altogether low. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Very Helpful and worth for your money and really time saving . I like the best for its designing and an tool for testing to try out the ios & android devices. From the view of a newbie i love the trial version of a period of 60days **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** It thought us how to cover more test in less time which is the major problem solved.We are handling huge number of regression scripts with this tool and so many hours of savings with this tool. ### 28. Functional testing from simple tests to complex BPT framework **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Fred S. | Sr. Quality Assurance Software Lead, Medical Devices, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 17, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** UFT provides the ideal one-stop-shop for integrating the testing of different application frameworks into one test IDE that can manage it all. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Price and a significant learning and implementation overhead. It is not easy (as it is not with many other tools) to just get up and go. The more powerful and larger scope testing you have, the longer it will take to developer the framework. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** If your company and products have a revolving need for automation and you may have needs for multiple architectures or even one large application framework that has a very large testing footprint, this is the tool for you. It's sheer power in bringing together different strategies and tactical approaches to testing are almost limitless. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Solving the golden regression execution criteria problem: how to cover much more testing in less time than manual. ### 29. Used to be good app for automation **Rating:** 3.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** January 07, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** This used to be good automation app. This is like old school app for automation testing. I automated almost all types of apps using this tool. (e.g. web app, desktop app). Never used it for mobile app automation. Supports wide variety of frameworks. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Thing I do not like about this app is its size. This is too heavy app. And looking at current open source app availability, this is less used in industry now. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** I used this to automated Web app and Desktop app Regression test cases. ### 30. Rating 9 for Hewlett-Packard **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Consumer Goods | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 19, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** I like the best for its designing and an tool for testing to try out the ios & android devices. From the view of a newbie i love the trial version of a period of 60days. Bro who gives so? **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Contrary to the best, a $2000+ for a startup company would be a little of bit expensive if paid in dollar. Continents like Asia, developing countries like India. Basically i am disliking for its communication towards user. i am trying sign up/reset password waiting minutes and no email has been received and yeah i checked my spam as well. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Definitely recommend if they improve the user communications regarding reset password as well. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am not solving any business problem. But for a starting of testing research, i & my company can take some steps. ### 31. UFT Makes Testing More Efficient and Effective **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Kathy B. | Self Employed, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 20, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** It allows me to automate almost anything without having to know base languages or vast knowledge of the various tools. It makes testing go much more quickly, accurately and efficiently, so it saves time and trouble. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is a little pricy. Being more expensive than some alternative programs, it is sometimes hard to justify the expense. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** This can definitely reduce the number of hours that are spent on testing, which will make your resources available for other tasks. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** We use this for test cases, where it has been very effective and beneficial. It enables to interact with and integrate with user interface style tests. ### 32. Great Automation Tool **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Retail | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** January 29, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Object Repository concept and robost performance of the tool. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Not supporting all kind of applications like mainframe or oracle applications **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Regression testing tools ### 33. Cool **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Education Management | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 20, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** How easy things are to manage and how easy the site is to get around. And how convenient the place is to use. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** There isn't much that I don't like. The only thing is I am new to this! I am just learning how to use this site. So I am sure there are lots of things to learn. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Learn as much as you can. There are people to help you when you need it. This site can really help you with everything that you could possibly need. It really is a great program! Give it an honest try. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am currently trying to start a personal business and this helps me out a lot. ### 34. Automated testing **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 10, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Well best things is for sure to remove mannual process which is quiet lengthy and which makes our delivery fast and accurate Uts also support cross browser so we no need to worry about. Graphical recognised **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Nothing i can say i will dislike in this currently as i am the start beginning in this **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Yes if you want to meet your goals with perfect displays then go for this Cheers **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Well i must delivery time meets and less stress to our qa team ### 35. the experienc ethat i had was very confident in terms of the way the software works **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** nicki D. | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 11, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** i like how it helps be obtain information **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** i dislike the speed that it has sometimes **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** we are solving security problems with UFT and it does a very well job in terms of how teh software is tight nit. ### 36. Uft **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Hospital & Health Care | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 12, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** It is configurable with alm and it is very easy set up, you don’t have to be technical to run automation tests. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is not good when using for complex systems or immature application. Best used for regression vs new functionality. Also not open source like selenium **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Creation of automation test bed that can be run frequently which doesn’t cost in terms of resources ### 37. e **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Banking | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 26, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Easy Api and Rest Testing, excellent tutorial and user guide **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** cost of license, not diffusion in College or unversities **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** yes **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** automated Tesiti g ### 38. Great Product **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Government Administration | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 19, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Functionality of the product and how simplified it is. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Nothing much actually but there is always room for improvement **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Mainly regression testing for most of our application upgrades. ### 39. Very good automation tool **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** January 16, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** HPE UFT (and previously HP QTP and before that Mercury WinRunner) has long been our main test automation tool of choice and underpins the majority of our regression testing activities. The versatility of it means it is also used to load data for the training department to use thus speeding up their work too. Without a robust automation suite, businesses would not be competitive in this day and age and for me, UFT helps to fulfill that need with ease. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Very expensive tool for startup or small organization. HP should offer different payment plans and different package **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Yes **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** If the application is based on Legacy platforms like Siebel or Mainframe, UFT fares quite well. ### 40. Easy to use **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Internet | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** October 24, 2017 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Reliability and ease of use. In recent versions starting with VS 2013 ultimate, I like the memory analysis features that are added under "Analyze" / Performance Profiler. You can use this to analyze memory post mortem. It has been added to debug so that memory usage can be analyzed during debugging. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Though not the core product - Resharper can slow down development unless some features are turned off. Can we expect a substitute - a sleeker add on product ? **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Great IDE. Can't think of an alternative for .NET development in a windows ecosystem. By the way, VS can integrate with git and github. The only downside I can think of is the frequency of updates. We have had versions 12, 13, 15 and 17 so far. Wouldn't once in, say 4 years be a better frequency for updates? I think it is. ### 41. UFT **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Manibhushana Rao G. | Product Manager, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 02, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Compatibility with ALM , Tecording feature **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Time of run and does not support cross browser testing **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** For test automation ### 42. Uft user review **Rating:** 1.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 20, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Uft provides excellent automation support **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Not supports parallel execution and it's too heavy coMpared to selenium **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Start supporting parallel execution **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Automation solution ### 43. UFT is a great tool to test applications for projects with short budgets. **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 02, 2016 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** I really like the plug in features where you can install plugins to add web services and it enables you to test webservices with in qtp itself **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** I wish the trail periods are more than 30days so that it helps in teams while in prototyping stage **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** we have varity of applications in our company and i have great experience working with QTP. Biggest advantage being able to test web services ### 44. Awesome tool 7+ years of journey with QTP/UFT **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Construction | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 30, 2016 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Brought the developers and the tester to a common platform making automation testing an wholesome experience. Compatibility with Windows, Mainframes, Mobile and web applications etc makes it even unique. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Licencing is very costly and consumes a lot CPU utilization which makes the performance altogether low. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Reduce the manual effort in turn making the whole process more user friendly and time efficient. ### 45. The best automation tool for professionals **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Nakul K. | Software Test Engineer, Information Technology and Services, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 13, 2015 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The way tool integrates with other platforms like .net , java,web application mobile os or mainframe is amazing. It cracks all application with its wide range of addin support makes it the best tool. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Of cource its licensing cost is very high. and some times it gets stuck due to high system utilization. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** I would highly recommend this tool as this will provide your Software quality a new level. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** All the applications built in my company uses this tool for functional testing ### 46. Automation tool UFT excellent automation tool. **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Suresh B. | Automation Architect, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** June 24, 2015 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Support So many applications, I worked with Web, Windows, mainframe (Terminal Emulator), Flex. User VBScript as scripting language which is very easy to handel and support most of the application on windows level. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Not a god support form HP for any issue. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Easy to use this tool, supports most of the applications. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** We are handling huge number of regression scripts with this tool and so many hours of savings with this tool. ## Opentext functional Testing Discussions - [Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-feature-of-micro-focus-unified-functional-testing-displays-vbscript-code) - 1 comment - [View Opentext functional Testing pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-functional-testing/reviews?section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-06-10+12%3A51%3A48+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=fe1374af-0d73-41d7-b97a-c4e8a8bbfd4c&secure%5Btoken%5D=fd09c44f160feb2ee8dd487bcde45ec022d8e8297f6abdeaa1bb37cb18ebb193&format=llm_user) ## Opentext functional Testing Features **Functionality ** - Test Feedback - Test History - Customization - Test Variety **Agentic AI - Software Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance **Automation** - Organization - Reliability - Thoroughness **Agentic AI - Automation Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance ## Top Opentext functional Testing Alternatives - [Ranorex Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/ranorex-studio/reviews) - 4.2/5.0 (243 reviews) - [Katalon True Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/katalon-true-platform/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (212 reviews) - [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-tosca/reviews) - 4.3/5.0 (62 reviews)