Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cypress and Opentext functional Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Cypress
Star Rating
(107)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansOpentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cypress excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a straightforward testing solution, while OpenText UFT One has a lower ease of use score of 8.1, which some reviewers find challenging for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress offers superior ease of setup with a score of 9.4, allowing teams to quickly integrate it into their workflow, whereas OpenText UFT One's setup process is rated at 8.1, leading to some frustration among users who prefer a more streamlined onboarding experience.
- G2 users highlight Cypress's strong test feedback capabilities, scoring 8.1, which helps teams quickly identify issues during testing, while OpenText UFT One's test feedback is less robust, leading to a score of 7.9, which some users feel hinders their debugging process.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress shines in its automation organization with a score of 8.1, allowing for better management of test cases, while OpenText UFT One's organization features are rated lower at 7.7, which some users find less intuitive.
- Users on G2 report that Cypress has a strong product direction with a positive score of 9.5, indicating a commitment to continuous improvement, while OpenText UFT One's product direction score of 8.1 suggests that users are less confident in its future development.
- Reviewers say that Cypress's customization options are rated at 8.1, providing flexibility for teams to tailor their testing environment, whereas OpenText UFT One's customization features are perceived as less user-friendly, contributing to a lower score in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cypress
Free Trial is available
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
92
8.7
40
Ease of Use
9.2
93
8.1
39
Ease of Setup
9.3
18
8.1
19
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
8.2
18
Quality of Support
8.8
74
8.5
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
8.4
16
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
90
8.1
37
Features by Category
Functionality
9.0
5
8.1
8
9.0
5
7.9
8
9.3
5
8.1
8
8.7
5
8.3
8
Automation
6.7
5
8.1
8
9.3
5
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cypress and Opentext functional Testing are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Cypress has no unique categories
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
42.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Financial Services
7.7%
Program Development
3.8%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 Comment
SR
Try cy.pause, intract with app for identity and then resume. Or use api calls.Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 Comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 Comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
