--- title: Opentext functional Testing Reviews meta_title: 'Opentext functional Testing Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 46 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Opentext functional Testing works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.2 review_count: 46 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-08-09' parent_category: name: Development url: https://www.g2.com/categories/development --- # Opentext functional Testing Reviews **Vendor:** OpenText **Category:** [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) **Average Rating:** 4.2/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 46 ## About Opentext functional Testing Test automation to make manual testing more efficient and let developers and testers collaborate. ## Opentext functional Testing Reviews ### 1. "UFT ONE" is one of the best automation tool in the Globe. **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 27, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Micro Focus UFT One is a powerful and feature-rich test automation tool that excels in its support for diverse technologies and robust object recognition. While it may have a learning curve and could be considered pricey, its capabilities make it a compelling choice for teams seeking a comprehensive solution for their test automation needs. Versatility: UFT One supports a wide range of technologies, including web, mobile, desktop, and API testing, making it suitable for testing diverse applications. Keyword-Driven Testing: The tool's keyword-driven approach allows for easier collaboration between technical and non-technical team members, facilitating efficient test script creation and maintenance. Object Recognition: UFT One boasts strong object recognition capabilities, adapting well to changes in the application's UI elements, leading to stable and reliable automated tests. Integrated Development Environment (IDE): The user-friendly IDE simplifies the process of creating, organizing, and executing test scripts. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** High Licensing Costs: Some users may find the licensing costs associated with UFT One to be relatively high, which could be a concern for teams with budget constraints. Learning Curve: Beginners might experience a steep learning curve, especially if they are new to test automation concepts. This could impact the tool's ease of adoption. Resource Intensive: UFT One can be resource-intensive, requiring a significant amount of system resources, which may impact the performance of the testing environment. Limited Cross-Browser Testing Support: While UFT One supports various technologies, its support for cross-browser testing may not be as extensive as some other specialized tools in the market. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** UFT ONE support almost all the platforms that are present in the market and for SFDC automation it is one the best tool as i consider due to clean integration process. ### 2. UFT One one of best Automation tool in the market **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 27, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Unified Functional Testing (UFT) One by Micro Focus is a comprehensive test automation tool primarily used for functional and regression testing. It supports a variety of technologies, including web, mobile, and desktop applications. Pros: Cross-platform Testing: UFT One supports testing across different platforms, making it versatile for various application types. Object Recognition: Its object recognition capabilities are robust, aiding in the identification and manipulation of diverse UI elements. Keyword-Driven Framework: The tool supports keyword-driven testing, enabling testers with varying technical expertise to participate in test automation. Integration with ALM: Seamless integration with Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) streamlines test management processes. Extensive Protocol Support: UFT One supports multiple protocols, making it suitable for testing a wide range of applications, from traditional desktop to modern web and mobile. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Resource Intensive: UFT One can be resource-intensive, especially for large test suites, leading to longer execution times. Cost: The licensing cost can be relatively high, which might be a concern for smaller teams or organizations with budget constraints. Learning Curve: It may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, particularly those new to automated testing or scripting. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** It helped me to Automate Power builder application. Covered Regression test suite and Smoke test suite using this. ### 3. MicroFocus UFT Review **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Rohit S. | Tech Analyst, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 23, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The best part about using UFT was the ease and range of things which can be automated with UFT. This AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Price comparable is sometimes not up to the mark. Also helping community is also not upto the mark **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing (UFT) One accelerates and simplifies end-to-end functional testing with one intelligent solution that builds and automates tests for mobile, web and desktop enterprise apps using embedded AI-based capabilities. ### 4. Happy to came across Micro Focus UFT One #Satisfied user **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Shreya Z. | Quality Assurance Analyst, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 22, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Comprehensive Testing Capabilities, Object Recognition and Repository, Integration Capabilities, Support for Multiple Technologies like Java, .NET, SAP. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** can be resource-intensive, especially when dealing with large test suites for complex applications. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Its strengths in object recognition, integration capabilities, and support for multiple technologies make it a valuable asset for test automation. ### 5. Best available tool for the functional and automation testing for different applications **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Lalit P. | Test Engineer, Airlines/Aviation, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 19, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Can be integrated with multiple tools especialy the test management tools **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Still focussing on the legacy applications and further can provide the open source functionalities to use as part of CD. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Solving the automation needs of users abd consultants with best availabel support Cost based licence users - with node individual server and concurrent multiple users feasibility available ### 6. Microfocus UFT one **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Raghavendra S. | Software Consultant, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 22, 2023 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** The platform compiled with AI intergeration which makes testing faster and smooth also this help developers to perform the functional testing **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Data sheet to evaluate the test likes very much **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** AI implementation makes the more intelligible tool which makes the testing smooth and error free ### 7. Better support for testing front end **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 10, 2022 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Easier to download and install Compatible with windows, desktop and web applications using pluggins Most secure with encryption features Reports available to view and debug the issues Can be integrated with ALM to track and fix bugs and execute the tests **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Costly compared to open source tools available for the same applications compatibility Can not support object supports for classes and functions Sometimes difficult to write tests for testers not having information on web based services. API testing cannot be much customized in uft one. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Solving the user end testing by keeping simple algorithms Tests by be configured based on different framework needs Testing strategy can be changed as per the requirement Different plugins to run different applications in a single test suite ### 8. Micro Focus UFT automation for desktop application **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Hospital & Health Care | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 26, 2022 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Micro Focus UFT one helps in automating desktop based applications and also helpful in implementing BDD framework with the use of cucumber and selenium. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Selenium cannot be used for desktop based applications but UFT one makes it possible. The complexity of setting up the framework is high as we will be using selenium and cucumber for this. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** It is helping in implementing BDD automation using selenium for desktop based applications. ### 9. UFT Reivew **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Telecommunications | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** December 04, 2020 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** We use UFT for test automation and for the reason it's very good! **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It stops suddenly at some point, but it could also be because of our test environment. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** I like UFT because it covers all my needs and is easy to use **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** Create, maintain, and run automation scripts in our test environment ### 10. Automated functional Testing made Easier - UFT **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** September 27, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.With a simple record and playback approach , UFT develops regression and functional test cases. 2.Both technical and non technical users can use UFT. 3.It works only multiple interfaces like SAP , Web, Silverlight , Mobile , Oracle etc. based on the interfaces selected by user. 4.It can be integrated with test management tools like HP ALM, Test Director , Winrunner etc. 5.Enables test reporting for analysis. 6.Allows easy maintenance of test cases. 7.Excellent object identification mechanism. 8.Supports XML. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.Cost of QTP is high. 2.Cannot run multiple instances- Does not support multithreading. 3.Performance is slow compared to selenium - Takes loads of RAM and CPU 4.All Addins are not free of cost . Few addins need to be purchased - Java, Oracle, Siebel 5.Supports limited versions of browsers **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** On the whole , UFT is a good tool to incorporate into any project. Since all kinds of frameworks can be worked with , this tool serves its purpose **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** 1.We are using UFT for functional testing where we follow a data driven aproach in automating SAP applications. 2.We use UFT not only for SAP but also for Web applications. 3.It uses VB script and not very high level programming language , making scripting easier ### 11. Excellent tool in automation! **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Patrícia P. | QA Automation Engineer, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 23, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** I have been working with this tool, for more than 1 year, to automate test cases of various management applications of a reputed company. The range of compatible applications is surprendent and quite useful. UFT provides add-ins so you can implement tests for various technologies such as SAP, WEB, Windows applications, console, among others. The tool is very simple and easy to interact with. Although I did not have previous experience, I easily learned how to use it. In each solution created (known as test) we can create actions, with its own set of input parameters - data passed by the user to be used in the test. Within the test, there may be several actions and these can be easily organized and ordered among themselves. If there are actions that are common to several tests, these can be invoked as external actions and thus, it is not necessary to repeat the source code that has been implemented previously, making the process simpler and faster. In addition, you can create libraries where there can be multiple functions that are called within each test. UFT also provides the "record" option that automatically generates the source code for the execution of the test, such as the action of clicking a certain button: objects are automatically stored in the repository and the code indicating the button click is generated. Another feature is the reports generated at the end of each test. They accurately indicate all the steps in the test and whether they were successful or not. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** Despite its great potential, this tool consumes a huge amout of resources. Even with a good processor, RAM and SSD, running tests with more than 3 add-ins makes the machine too slow and difficult to work with. During the use, I came across a major limitation that even the support team couldn't help me: massive export of tests (solutions). The client had to move the tests from one location to another within their server. In order to do this, we use the "export" functionality of UFT, which forces us to open each test and select this option and specify the destination folder. By doing this, all links and references to external libraries and actions ceased to function. The only solution was to open each test and fix the various connections, for a total of 5000 tests! This tool is suitable for large companies, however, it is little prepared to massive changes of items, which is a serious problem in large companies. The licenses of this tool are very expensive, which limits the small and medium companies to use it. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** It is an excellent tool, but you need a good machine to use it. Care should be taken to change the location of the implementations. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** The UFT allows you to create a set of tests. Each test execute a specific test case, with routines of a set of actions, to be executed in several technologies used in the management and exercise of activity of several companies, like SAP, Windows applications, Web, among others. It is possible to run these tests automatically, with various inputs and thus, test the applications used in companies daily, to verify and validate if they behave as expected. It is a way of validating that the whole process of company management is fully functional. ### 12. Micro Focus UFT **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Utilities | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 15, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** UFT supports VB scripting and it has wide support for automating many different UIs and applications. It all comes with different plugins. Record and play is the very easy and simple method to use with UFT but usually we use the recording option at the base level and integrate that code with our automation framework. It has very good integration with Mocro Focus ALM and so the test and defect management are very easy.It can also integrate with GIT for version control. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** UFT always requires some framework to be developed which sometimes makes it more complex. It supports only VB Scripting and so there are many limitations in coding. The object repository management is also not that good. UFT sometimes hang or show many issues in normal use. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Very useful tool for end to end test automation of ERP solutions like SAP, Oracle etc. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** End to end test automation for SAP and its integrated systems. UFT is very helpful in multi software environment especially with ERP solutions like SAP. It can also use for API testing. ### 13. The best test automation tool but it should be more efficient **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Nelson P. | Senior QA Automation Engineer, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 24, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Micro Focus UFT is a very good software for test automation because it handles different types of software, is simple to use and It's easily integrated with ALM and Jenkins. The record works really good and most of the time, is very useful. For test scenarios that require multiple executions with different data for each execution Micro Focus UFT is the best choice. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** The license is too expensive. It should be able to use other programming languages instead of only VBScript. It's not efficient, I am using Micro Focus UFT on a reasonable good laptop with an Intel i7 8Gen, 16Gb of ram and most of the time it runs slow when executing tests. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** It's one of the best products for test automation in the market. If you are looking for a product that has a really good support this is the product that you are looking for. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am using Micro Focus UFT to test an API with putty by SSH. UFT is very useful because it is probably the only one that can pick up the coordinates of a putty session with the Record option and this turns my work much more easier. ### 14. Best Rider for Testers **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Information Technology and Services | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** October 19, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.techie friendly, 2.very efficient, 3.have solution for complex things 4.integration part is minimal(test managing tools) 5.easy to setup(made one-click setup) 6.comes with vb script. 7.great in performance. 8.meets any kind of application **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** 1.still they can optimize the things in a lot of places. 2. The add-ins part is a bit awful. 3.need to make any lighter version **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** as the product is costly but it will not disappoint you. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** good at regression, the integration part ### 15. UFT for functional automation **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** January 02, 2019 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** 1)Easy to use 2) Very helpful for beginners also for QA automation 3) Gives us Record and Play back, can be used by freshers 4) It uses VB Scripting which is again a very simple coding language. 5) I liked the inbuilt checkpoints feature and also Object Repository. 6) Results viewer is again a super tool for UFT results analysis 7) We can also record an execution of the script using 'Mirco Player' and save it for future purposes,which i have used for delivering script/execution demos team. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is slow if we have to load all the add in's from Add In manager while launching UFT. Also it crashes sometimes when working on IE browser and results wont be generated alteast till the point where the script has been crashed giving me hard time to go back and rerun the entire script again especially if i have to run over 100 test cases per execution :( Also this is a licensed tool. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** If your organisation can afford for licensing this is a very good tool for Functional testing automation. Easy to use with all inbuilt features like checkpoints, Object repository , data tables, reports, functional libraries, reusing actions etc. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** This was my first QA automation tool which i have learned and used to build over 400+ regression test cases automation. Results sharing is very easy to the higher management by sharing the charts from results viewer, Micro Player can be used to record script execution and save for demo purposes or future references to train new joiners etc. ### 16. "really worthful and bestest automation tool ever" **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Yadav Anant S. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** it can perform multiple tests simultaneously, we can change test, debug tests and manage parameters.It allows running distributed tests on multiple machines.The versatility of it means it is also used to load data for the training department to use thus speeding up their work too. Without a robust automation suite, businesses would not be competitive in this day and age and for me, UFT helps to fulfill that need with ease. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is a bit slow and acts erratically.Not a good support from hp for any issue.a lot CPU utilization which makes the performance altogether low. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** Very Helpful and worth for your money and really time saving . I like the best for its designing and an tool for testing to try out the ios & android devices. From the view of a newbie i love the trial version of a period of 60days **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** It thought us how to cover more test in less time which is the major problem solved.We are handling huge number of regression scripts with this tool and so many hours of savings with this tool. ### 17. UFT Makes Testing More Efficient and Effective **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Kathy B. | Self Employed, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 20, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** It allows me to automate almost anything without having to know base languages or vast knowledge of the various tools. It makes testing go much more quickly, accurately and efficiently, so it saves time and trouble. **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** It is a little pricy. Being more expensive than some alternative programs, it is sometimes hard to justify the expense. **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** This can definitely reduce the number of hours that are spent on testing, which will make your resources available for other tasks. **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** We use this for test cases, where it has been very effective and beneficial. It enables to interact with and integrate with user interface style tests. ### 18. the experienc ethat i had was very confident in terms of the way the software works **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** nicki D. | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 11, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** i like how it helps be obtain information **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** i dislike the speed that it has sometimes **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** we are solving security problems with UFT and it does a very well job in terms of how teh software is tight nit. ### 19. e **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Banking | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 26, 2018 **What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?** Easy Api and Rest Testing, excellent tutorial and user guide **What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?** cost of license, not diffusion in College or unversities **Recommendations to others considering Opentext functional Testing:** yes **What problems is Opentext functional Testing solving and how is that benefiting you?** automated Tesiti g ## Opentext functional Testing Discussions - [Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-feature-of-micro-focus-unified-functional-testing-displays-vbscript-code) - 1 comment - [View Opentext functional Testing pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-functional-testing/reviews?filters%5Bnps_score%5D%5B%5D=4§ion=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-08-10+19%3A30%3A31+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=851f5b92-5889-4a68-9bf1-81d46758477b&secure%5Btoken%5D=2eadccba409405ef9740394491ae2cea523a1c189cd66ad137d74e7ff362ea94&format=llm_user) ## Opentext functional Testing Features **Functionality ** - Test Feedback - Test History - Customization - Test Variety **Agentic AI - Software Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance **Automation** - Organization - Reliability - Thoroughness **Agentic AI - Automation Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance - Supports Parallel Execution **Additional Functionality** - Assessment Management - Reporting & Statistics - Security Testing - Parameterized Testing - Data Visualization - Data Import/Export - AI Copilot - API - Unicode Compliance - Monitoring - Performance Management - Real-Time Reporting - Issue Tracking - Performance Testing - Bug Tracking - Compliance Management - Move & Copy - Requirements Management - Hierarchical View - User Management - Software Testing Management - Model-Based Testing - Activity Dashboard - Issue Management - Quality Assurance - Version Control - Activity Tracking - Data Extraction - Static Analysis - Requirements-Based Testing - Real-Time Monitoring - Customizable Reports - A/B Testing - Alerts/Notifications - Action-Word Testing - Test Script Reviews - Data Storage Management - Workflow Management - Generative AI - Collaboration Tools - Drag & Drop ## Top Opentext functional Testing Alternatives - [Katalon](https://www.g2.com/products/katalon/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (214 reviews) - [Ranorex Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/ranorex-studio/reviews) - 4.2/5.0 (243 reviews) - [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-tosca/reviews) - 4.3/5.0 (62 reviews)