What do you like best about Media Composer?
Media Composer is suited to big projects, for example a documentary series with hundreds of hours of footage. Its bin system and hierarchy of clips and subclips are great for organising material – as long as you stick to a disciplined workflow and don't just throw stuff in the cupboard.
The trim feature is powerful and has several modes to suit your preference. There are several ways of doing most things and lots of options to customise the interface.
Multiple users can work on the same project simultaneously. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Media Composer?
Media Composer is not easy to learn. It can be counter-intuitive and features are tucked away in unexpected places.
Although the application can do most things, some tasks are over-complicated compared with Final Cut and Premier, or require a work-around.
The whole application is riddled with bugs, which is surprising considering how long it's been around. A look through Avid's own forums reveals thousands of pleas from desperate editors stopped in their tracks with a deadline looming. Niggly glitches appear and disappear for reasons unknown.
Media management can be a nightmare. Clips can come unlinked to their files, threatening the entire project. The relink command seldom if ever works.
Some features are very disappointing, for example shot stablization which often seems to make no difference. Compare that with Final Cut's "tripod mode" which works like a dream. Audio EQ is another area that falls far behind the competition. High-end editors find they need expensive plug-ins to get the best results. For a mature application that claims to be the choice of top professionals, everything should "come in the box."
Error messages are prolific and incomprehensible. Why can't they explain the problem in plain language? From forum posts it's clear that even the experts don't know what they mean.
The licensing procedure is rather clunky, made more difficult by Avid's website which seems more intent on marketing than providing useful information for users.
It's true that MC is widely used in broadcast and film studios, but that's partly because it was one of the first NLEs. It got a toehold in the industry when it was too expensive for those further down the food chain. Having struggled to master this difficult programme, many editors were reluctant to tackle another.
In my view Avid has rested on its laurels. It stood by while the opposition caught up and overtook. Now it tries to hold its place with new features which very few will need. It should concentrate on fixing what's broken and making the application more stable and user friendly. And it should make sure the box includes all the things that really matter.
I've been using MC for 17 years but If I was starting again knowing what I know now, it would not be my choice of editor. Sometimes I love it, but just as often it frustrates the hell out of me! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.