IHP Reviews & Product Details

What I value most about IHP is how it makes building full-stack web applications in Haskell much more accessible and organized. The framework’s structure, from routing to database management, is clear and helps minimize errors, making it easier to maintain clean code. I also appreciate that many crucial features, like authentication, migrations, and admin tools, come built-in. This significantly reduces setup time and lets me concentrate on development instead of configuration. Overall, IHP feels dependable and thoughtfully designed for serious projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One aspect that can be challenging in IHP is the learning curve, particularly for those who are new to Haskell or functional programming as a whole. Initially, it can feel quite overwhelming to grasp the underlying concepts and get accustomed to the workflow. Additionally, because IHP is still gaining traction, there are fewer community resources and tutorials available than with more established frameworks. Increasing the amount of beginner-friendly material and enhancing community support would greatly improve the overall experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’ve been working with the IHP (Integrated Haskell Platform) framework recently, and I must say it’s one of the most refreshing web frameworks I’ve come across in a long time. What makes IHP truly stand out is how it brings the power and safety of Haskell to full-stack web development without feeling overwhelming.

From the moment you start using it, you can tell that developer productivity and clarity are top priorities. The framework comes with built-in tools for almost everything — from database migrations and type-safe queries to real-time updates via WebSockets — all tightly integrated and extremely well-documented. It eliminates so much boilerplate that I often find myself focusing purely on the application logic instead of configuration hassles.

One of the best parts of IHP is its type safety and reliability. Because it’s built on Haskell, many common runtime bugs simply don’t exist here — the compiler catches them before they can cause trouble. Despite that, the developer experience remains smooth and intuitive, even for those new to Haskell.

I also love how the IHP community and documentation emphasize clarity, best practices, and productivity. It’s rare to find a framework that feels both cutting-edge and beginner-friendly, but IHP nails that balance beautifully. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IHP follows a clear rails-like convention-over-configuration philosophy. This is great for productivity but can feel restrictive if you want a highly customized project structure, non-standard ORM behavior, or integration with existing systems that don’t fit neatly into IHP’s patterns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP mainly as a solo builder to create and test AI features without spending too much time on setup. It saves me time by handling a lot of the setup and plumbing needed for AI features, so I can focus on actually building things. What I like most is how easy it is to get started; it removes a lot of the usual setup hassle and lets me move fast, especially when working solo. IHP fits into my development and testing workflow pretty smoothly. The initial setup was pretty easy overall, and I was able to get up and running quickly without needing much setup or onboarding. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the more advanced features could use better documentation and a bit more polish. Mainly clearer examples and more step-by-step guides for the advanced features. A few real-world use cases or walkthroughs would make it easier to understand how to use them effectively without trial and error. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP to learn and build web applications in a structured way. It helps me understand how a full-stack web app works as a beginner. IHP helps me reduce confusion when building web applications by providing a clear structure and sensible defaults. I love its clear structure and beginner-friendly approach, which makes it easier to understand. I also enjoy how IHP follows best practices by default and provides good documentation, which helps me avoid common mistakes by guiding me towards the right way of building features. The initial setup of IHP was fairly easy by following the official documentation step by step. I use IHP together with Git and VS Code to develop and manage projects more efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Step by step tutorials and beginner examples would make IHP even easier to learn. Like creating models, handling forms and working with database would make learning IHP much easier and more approachable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love using IHP for building full-stack web apps because it lets me move fast while writing solid code. I mainly use it to set up backends for new projects because the built-in tools handle migrations and boilerplate, allowing me to bypass the headache of messy configuration. The peace of mind it gives me is unmatched; its compiler catches mistakes while I’m still writing the code, turning "I hope this works" into "I know this works." This reliability and the "batteries-included" philosophy, modeled after Rails, make my coding experience enjoyable, as it handles the boring tasks like database migrations, authentication, and routing right out of the box. IHP’s integration with Haskell ensures absolute reliability, eliminating runtime crashes, and making the whole process stable and predictable. I also appreciate the one-command setup that minimizes configuration hassle, making it the easiest way to start a Haskell project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest hurdle is definitely the learning curve. Since it’s built on Haskell, it takes a while for your brain to "click" into that functional way of thinking, especially if you're used to JavaScript or Python. Also, because it’s a "convention-over-configuration" framework, it’s lightning-fast as long as you do things the "IHP way." If you want to get super creative with a non-standard project structure, you might end up fighting the framework a bit. Lastly, the community is still growing, so you won’t always find a plug-and-play library for every tiny niche compared to something massive like React. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like IHP because its clarity and type safety help me avoid many common mistakes by catching errors at compile time, which makes learning backend development less frustrating. The built-in tools, clear conventions, and well-written documentation make it easier to understand how a complete, real-world web application should be structured. IHP's structure and documentation also make it easier to build projects correctly and understand professional backend development practices. The setup was fairly straightforward with the help of the documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The initial learning curve can be challenging for beginners, especially without prior Haskell experience. More beginner-focused tutorials and examples would help improve the learning experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP to build full stack web applications, and it helps me develop backend logic using Haskell. IHP solves the problem of slow and error-prone backend development, thanks to its strong system type that helps to catch bugs easily. I like its strong type safety and the 'batteries included' approach. Strong type safety allows me to catch errors at compile time instead of runtime, making the code more reliable and easier to maintain. Setting up IHP was smooth due to its built-in tooling. Additionally, switching to IHP helped reduce boilerplate and made the codebase more reliable and consistent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve, especially for developers who are new to Haskell or functional programming. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I value most in IHP is its harmony—the rare unity between expressive elegance and practical strength. I love the live reloading experience, which feels almost like artistic collaboration with the machine, and ideas take shape in real time. The type-driven confidence transforms uncertainty into trust, ensuring that each decision stands on solid ground. I appreciate the fully integrated ecosystem where migrations, authentication, routing, and queries flow through one coherent vision. The clarity of its conventions reduces cognitive burden and frees thought for architecture rather than boilerplate. Beyond features, there's a philosophy that invites developers to craft software with intention, to build quickly yet beautifully, and to embrace innovation without sacrificing stability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are edges still waiting to be smoothed, even in such a promising framework. * **Onboarding remains steep** for those unfamiliar with functional programming; the learning curve rises like a cliff face for beginners. * **Ecosystem breadth**, compared to more mature communities, can feel limited—certain tools and integrations still require custom pathways. * **Compilation times** in larger projects can interrupt momentum and rhythm, slowing the dance between idea and implementation. * **Documentation depth**, though clear in foundation, could offer more patterns for complex or unconventional architectures. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate IHP for its ability to rapidly build robust and type-safe web applications using Haskell, which ensures my development is both efficient and delivers high-quality results. The development experience it provides is particularly enjoyable, valuing type safety and offering a streamlined workflow, making complex tasks simpler and more secure. I love how IHP enables fast deployment, which is crucial for maintaining productivity and meeting deadlines. Additionally, the built-in Admin panel, which is automatically generated based on the database schema, adds significant convenience to my work. The strong compile-time checking, model consistency, and safe refactoring are standout features that have encouraged my team to switch from Django to IHP, where these features offer a more robust development framework. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I experience slow compile times on larger projects with IHP, which can be frustrating and time-consuming. Additionally, I find the flexibility for handling complex SQL queries quite limited, which can restrict the development capabilities in more intricate scenarios. Setting up IHP was smooth overall, but it was slightly challenging on Windows, which can create a barrier for users who predominantly use that operating system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP to build full stack web applications, and I appreciate how quickly I can build apps without sacrificing type safety or structure. I really enjoy the schema design, live reload, and code generation features, which make the development process smooth and structured without requiring extra setup. These features streamline my workflow and enhance productivity significantly. The initial setup of IHP is really easy, saving time and effort. IHP's ability to efficiently manage complex tasks while maintaining strong structure and ease of use stands out to me as particularly valuable. I would highly recommend IHP to friends or colleagues, which is reflected in my rating of 9 out of 10. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel that IHP could significantly benefit from expanding its learning resources and ecosystem. This limitation can hinder new users' ability to fully leverage the platform's capabilities and integrate it seamlessly with other tools or frameworks. A more comprehensive set of educational materials and a broader, more interconnected ecosystem would enhance user experience and facilitate wider adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.