IHP Reviews & Product Details

I really like how IHP focuses on developer productivity while still giving full control over the application architecture. The built-in features like authentication, migrations, code generation, and type safety make it easier to build real-world web applications without spending too much time on boilerplate setup. The opinionated structure also helps beginners understand best practices from the start. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main challenge I noticed is the learning curve for new users, especially those who are not very familiar with Haskell. Sometimes the documentation feels a bit advanced, which can make it harder for beginners to understand certain concepts quickly. Adding more beginner-friendly examples and tutorials would make IHP even more approachable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I value most about IHP is how it makes building full-stack web applications in Haskell much more accessible and organized. The framework’s structure, from routing to database management, is clear and helps minimize errors, making it easier to maintain clean code. I also appreciate that many crucial features, like authentication, migrations, and admin tools, come built-in. This significantly reduces setup time and lets me concentrate on development instead of configuration. Overall, IHP feels dependable and thoughtfully designed for serious projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One aspect that can be challenging in IHP is the learning curve, particularly for those who are new to Haskell or functional programming as a whole. Initially, it can feel quite overwhelming to grasp the underlying concepts and get accustomed to the workflow. Additionally, because IHP is still gaining traction, there are fewer community resources and tutorials available than with more established frameworks. Increasing the amount of beginner-friendly material and enhancing community support would greatly improve the overall experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP to learn and experiment with internal tooling and automation, and I find it helpful for understanding internal platforms and building simple tools quickly. IHP makes it easy to create internal tools and saves time compared to building everything from scratch. I really appreciate how easy it is to use and how quickly I can build and manage internal tools. I also enjoy the clean interface and smooth overall experience, which makes working with IHP efficient and stress-free. The initial setup was quite easy and straightforward, even as a student, and I was able to get started quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IHP works well in terms of ease of use and overall workflow. One thing that could be improved is providing more beginner-friendly documentation and examples. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’ve been working with the IHP (Integrated Haskell Platform) framework recently, and I must say it’s one of the most refreshing web frameworks I’ve come across in a long time. What makes IHP truly stand out is how it brings the power and safety of Haskell to full-stack web development without feeling overwhelming.

From the moment you start using it, you can tell that developer productivity and clarity are top priorities. The framework comes with built-in tools for almost everything — from database migrations and type-safe queries to real-time updates via WebSockets — all tightly integrated and extremely well-documented. It eliminates so much boilerplate that I often find myself focusing purely on the application logic instead of configuration hassles.

One of the best parts of IHP is its type safety and reliability. Because it’s built on Haskell, many common runtime bugs simply don’t exist here — the compiler catches them before they can cause trouble. Despite that, the developer experience remains smooth and intuitive, even for those new to Haskell.

I also love how the IHP community and documentation emphasize clarity, best practices, and productivity. It’s rare to find a framework that feels both cutting-edge and beginner-friendly, but IHP nails that balance beautifully. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IHP follows a clear rails-like convention-over-configuration philosophy. This is great for productivity but can feel restrictive if you want a highly customized project structure, non-standard ORM behavior, or integration with existing systems that don’t fit neatly into IHP’s patterns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP for our core business logic because it ensures type safety across the entire stack. IHP resolved our issue with frequent runtime regressions, as the compiler acts like a 24/7 QA assistant. I love that it catches edge cases and null pointer exceptions before they reach any users. The HSX templating engine is a favorite, offering the intuitive feel of JSX but with added safety, catching HTML syntax errors and broken links before rendering. HSX gives me the declarative feel of React's JSX combined with the safety of the Haskell compiler, ensuring I never ship broken layouts or malformed tags. IHP adds Haskell compiler safety to a Rails-like developer experience, effectively moving the testing phase to the compilation phase, boosting my confidence in the code's data flow. It allows us to ship features faster with smaller QA cycles. The initial setup is smooth, primarily due to IHP's use of Nix for managing the environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the main challenges is the reliance on Nix; while it makes environment setup deterministic, it can be a heavy dependency for those unfamiliar with it, and troubleshooting Nix-specific build errors can sometimes be intimidating. Additionally, the documentation for advanced use cases—like integrating custom JSON APIs or non-standard database configurations—could be more comprehensive with more real-world examples. Lastly, while the 'convention over configuration' approach is great for speed, it can occasionally feel restrictive if you need to deviate significantly from the recommended project structure or use a different CSS framework than the default Bootstrap integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IHP feels like someone finally figured out how to make serious, type-safe web development not feel like a chore. Using it is honestly refreshing. You get the raw power of Haskell, but wrapped in a framework that actually cares about developer experience. Things just make sense. The moment you start building, you realize how much friction it removes from the usual full-stack workflow.

What really hits is how opinionated yet productive it is. Database migrations, type-safe queries, background jobs, WebSockets all built in, all wired together cleanly. There’s almost zero yak-shaving. Instead of fighting config files or glue code, you’re shipping features. The compiler becomes your safety net, catching bugs early, which massively boosts confidence when refactoring or scaling.

Another big win is the clarity. The codebase stays readable, predictable, and hard to mess up. Even if you’re not a Haskell wizard, IHP guides you toward good patterns by default. The docs and community reinforce that mindset clean code, best practices, and long-term maintainability over quick hacks. It feels modern, thoughtful, and honestly ahead of most mainstream frameworks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IHP is very opinionated, and that’s a double edged sword. If you like going off the rails custom architectures, unconventional data models, or deep integration with legacy systems you might feel boxed in. The framework wants you to do things its way, and pushing against that can take effort.

Also, while IHP lowers the barrier to Haskell, it doesn’t remove it completely. There’s still a learning curve, especially if you’re coming from dynamic or loosely typed ecosystems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love using IHP for building full-stack web apps because it lets me move fast while writing solid code. I mainly use it to set up backends for new projects because the built-in tools handle migration and boilerplate, allowing me to bypass the headache of messy configuration. Its compiler catches mistakes while I'm still writing code, which is a huge help. IHP helps me move fast without dealing with messy backend setup. The built-in tooling handles migration and boilerplate so I can focus on business logic instead of configuration. What I like most about IHP is how opinionated and well-integrated it is. Everything works together out of the box so I don't waste time on configuration. The initial setup was straightforward, especially with the built-in tooling and clear conventions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback is the learning curve, especially if you're new to Haskell and the smaller ecosystem compared to mainstream frameworks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP mainly as a solo builder to create and test AI features without spending too much time on setup. It saves me time by handling a lot of the setup and plumbing needed for AI features, so I can focus on actually building things. What I like most is how easy it is to get started; it removes a lot of the usual setup hassle and lets me move fast, especially when working solo. IHP fits into my development and testing workflow pretty smoothly. The initial setup was pretty easy overall, and I was able to get up and running quickly without needing much setup or onboarding. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the more advanced features could use better documentation and a bit more polish. Mainly clearer examples and more step-by-step guides for the advanced features. A few real-world use cases or walkthroughs would make it easier to understand how to use them effectively without trial and error. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IHP to learn and build web applications in a structured way. It helps me understand how a full-stack web app works as a beginner. IHP helps me reduce confusion when building web applications by providing a clear structure and sensible defaults. I love its clear structure and beginner-friendly approach, which makes it easier to understand. I also enjoy how IHP follows best practices by default and provides good documentation, which helps me avoid common mistakes by guiding me towards the right way of building features. The initial setup of IHP was fairly easy by following the official documentation step by step. I use IHP together with Git and VS Code to develop and manage projects more efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Step by step tutorials and beginner examples would make IHP even easier to learn. Like creating models, handling forms and working with database would make learning IHP much easier and more approachable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love using IHP for building full-stack web apps because it lets me move fast while writing solid code. I mainly use it to set up backends for new projects because the built-in tools handle migrations and boilerplate, allowing me to bypass the headache of messy configuration. The peace of mind it gives me is unmatched; its compiler catches mistakes while I’m still writing the code, turning "I hope this works" into "I know this works." This reliability and the "batteries-included" philosophy, modeled after Rails, make my coding experience enjoyable, as it handles the boring tasks like database migrations, authentication, and routing right out of the box. IHP’s integration with Haskell ensures absolute reliability, eliminating runtime crashes, and making the whole process stable and predictable. I also appreciate the one-command setup that minimizes configuration hassle, making it the easiest way to start a Haskell project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest hurdle is definitely the learning curve. Since it’s built on Haskell, it takes a while for your brain to "click" into that functional way of thinking, especially if you're used to JavaScript or Python. Also, because it’s a "convention-over-configuration" framework, it’s lightning-fast as long as you do things the "IHP way." If you want to get super creative with a non-standard project structure, you might end up fighting the framework a bit. Lastly, the community is still growing, so you won’t always find a plug-and-play library for every tiny niche compared to something massive like React. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.