# Top 10 HiveMQ Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 97
The Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with HiveMQ. Message Queue (MQ) Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking quick, reliable software solutions with resource optimization, predictive maintenance, and connection status. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to HiveMQ include messages and communication. The best overall HiveMQ alternative is EMQX. Other similar apps like HiveMQ are MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, SAP Integration Suite, Portainer, and RabbitMQ. HiveMQ alternatives can be found in [Message Queue (MQ) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq) but may also be in [iPaaS Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/ipaas) or [Container Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/container-management).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to HiveMQ
  - [EMQX](https://www.g2.com/products/emqx/reviews)
  - [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/mulesoft-anypoint-platform/reviews)
  - [SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-integration-suite/reviews)
  - [Portainer](https://www.g2.com/products/portainer/reviews)
  - [RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/products/rabbitmq/reviews)
  - [Geotab](https://www.g2.com/products/geotab/reviews)
  - [Particle](https://www.g2.com/products/particle/reviews)
  - [IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-mq/reviews)
  - [Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-activemq/reviews)
  - [Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-kafka/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to HiveMQ Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how HiveMQ stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Industrial Automation, and Marketing and Advertising, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [EMQX](https://www.g2.com/products/emqx/reviews)
By EMQ
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 23
EMQ is an innovative open-source software provider with strong roots in IoT data infrastructure, delivering the world’s leading cloud-native MQTT messaging, streaming database, and edge computing solutions. Since 2017 EMQ has been developing a high-performance and massively scalable distributed MQTT messaging server¬ – EMQX to accelerate the connectivity and integration of a wide spectrum of IoT applications and data across multiple platforms. So far, EMQX has been adopted by more than 10,000 enterprise users from over 50 countries, connecting more than 100 million IoT devices worldwide. EMQ’s robust and flexible edge-to-cloud IoT data solutions encompass a suite of technologies designed for IoT applications: reliability, security, availability, scalability, latency & throughput. This enables successful enterprise-grade IoT deployments with ease and scale.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, EMQX is:
- More usable
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq), [IoT Connectivity Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-connectivity-management), [Industrial IoT](https://www.g2.com/categories/industrial-iot)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-hivemq)
**Compare EMQX with other alternatives:**
- [EMQX vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [EMQX vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [EMQX vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-portainer)
- [EMQX vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-rabbitmq)
- [EMQX vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-geotab)
- [EMQX vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-particle)
- [EMQX vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-ibm-mq)
- [EMQX vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-emqx)
- [EMQX vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-emqx)

  ### 2. [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/mulesoft-anypoint-platform/reviews)
By Salesforce
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 775
Anypoint Platform™ is a complete platform that lets companies realize business transformation through API-led connectivity. It is is a unified, flexible integration platform that solves the most challenging connectivity problems across SOA, SaaS and APIs.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/hivemq-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
**Compare MuleSoft Anypoint Platform with other alternatives:**
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-portainer)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-rabbitmq)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-particle)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)

  ### 3. [SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-integration-suite/reviews)
By SAP
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 339
SAP Integration Suite powers applications that deliver real-time insights to drive more effective and timely decision making. Dramatically accelerate analytics, business processes, sentiment data processing, and predictive capabilities to run your business in real-time.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, SAP Integration Suite is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/hivemq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
**Compare SAP Integration Suite with other alternatives:**
- [SAP Integration Suite vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/portainer-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/rabbitmq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/particle-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [SAP Integration Suite vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-sap-integration-suite)

  ### 4. [Portainer](https://www.g2.com/products/portainer/reviews)
By Portainer
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 297
Portainer is a universal container management platform to deploy, configure, troubleshoot, and secure containerized applications across cloud, data center, edge, and Industrial IoT use cases. Portainer is trusted by customers across various industries, including financial services, information technology, manufacturing, energy, automotive, and healthcare, to simplify container adoption securely and with exceptional speed. Portainer offers the perfect blend of infrastructure versatility, self-service freedom, and compliance guardrails to deliver containerized applications in a way that suits every part of the organization. Portainer provides extensive support for container orchestrators across every deployment scenario and helps bridge the knowledge gap within every organization.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, Portainer is:
- Slower to reach roi
- Easier to admin
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Industrial IoT](https://www.g2.com/categories/industrial-iot)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/hivemq-vs-portainer)
**Compare Portainer with other alternatives:**
- [Portainer vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-portainer)
- [Portainer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-portainer)
- [Portainer vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/portainer-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [Portainer vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/portainer-vs-rabbitmq)
- [Portainer vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-portainer)
- [Portainer vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/particle-vs-portainer)
- [Portainer vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-portainer)
- [Portainer vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-portainer)
- [Portainer vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-portainer)

  ### 5. [RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/products/rabbitmq/reviews)
By Broadcom
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 48
Messaging that just works


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, RabbitMQ is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/hivemq-vs-rabbitmq)
**Compare RabbitMQ with other alternatives:**
- [RabbitMQ vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/rabbitmq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [RabbitMQ vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/portainer-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/particle-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-rabbitmq)
- [RabbitMQ vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-rabbitmq)

  ### 6. [Geotab](https://www.g2.com/products/geotab/reviews)
By Geotab
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 214
Geotab is a global leader in telematics, providing open platform fleet management solutions to businesses of all sizes. Geotab's intuitive, full-featured solutions help businesses better manage their drivers and vehicles by extracting accurate and actionable intelligence from real-time and historical trips data.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, Geotab is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Industrial IoT](https://www.g2.com/categories/industrial-iot)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-hivemq)
**Compare Geotab with other alternatives:**
- [Geotab vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-geotab)
- [Geotab vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [Geotab vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [Geotab vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-portainer)
- [Geotab vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-rabbitmq)
- [Geotab vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-particle)
- [Geotab vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-ibm-mq)
- [Geotab vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-geotab)
- [Geotab vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-geotab)

  ### 7. [Particle](https://www.g2.com/products/particle/reviews)
By Particle
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 195
Particle offers a suite of hardware and software tools to help you prototype, scale, and manage your Internet of Things products.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, Particle is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Industrial IoT](https://www.g2.com/categories/industrial-iot)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/hivemq-vs-particle)
**Compare Particle with other alternatives:**
- [Particle vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-particle)
- [Particle vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/mulesoft-anypoint-platform-vs-particle)
- [Particle vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/particle-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [Particle vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/particle-vs-portainer)
- [Particle vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/particle-vs-rabbitmq)
- [Particle vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-particle)
- [Particle vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-particle)
- [Particle vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-particle)
- [Particle vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-particle)

  ### 8. [IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-mq/reviews)
By IBM
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 174
IBM® MQ, formerly WebSphere MQ, is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms. It uses message queues to exchange information and offers a single messaging solution for cloud, on premise, mobile and IoT environments. By connecting virtually everything, from a simple pair of applications to the most complex business environments, it improves responsiveness, controls costs, reduces risk and provides real-time insight from data. It is available in a standard edition, an advanced edition, as an appliance and in a z/OS version.


Reviewers say compared to HiveMQ, IBM MQ is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/hivemq-vs-ibm-mq)
**Compare IBM MQ with other alternatives:**
- [IBM MQ vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/emqx-vs-ibm-mq)
- [IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [IBM MQ vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [IBM MQ vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-portainer)
- [IBM MQ vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-rabbitmq)
- [IBM MQ vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/geotab-vs-ibm-mq)
- [IBM MQ vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-mq-vs-particle)
- [IBM MQ vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-ibm-mq)
- [IBM MQ vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-ibm-mq)

  ### 9. [Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-activemq/reviews)
By The Apache Software Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 16
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.


Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-hivemq)
**Compare Apache ActiveMQ with other alternatives:**
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-emqx)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-portainer)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-rabbitmq)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-geotab)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-particle)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-ibm-mq)
- [Apache ActiveMQ vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-apache-kafka)

  ### 10. [Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-kafka/reviews)
By The Apache Software Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 132
Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed event streaming platform developed by the Apache Software Foundation. It is designed to handle real-time data feeds with high throughput and low latency, making it ideal for building data pipelines, streaming analytics, and integrating data across various systems. Kafka enables organizations to publish, store, and process streams of records in a fault-tolerant and scalable manner, supporting mission-critical applications across diverse industries. Key Features and Functionality: - High Throughput and Low Latency: Kafka delivers messages at network-limited throughput with latencies as low as 2 milliseconds, ensuring efficient data processing. - Scalability: It can scale production clusters up to thousands of brokers, handling trillions of messages per day and petabytes of data, while elastically expanding and contracting storage and processing capabilities. - Durable Storage: Kafka stores streams of data safely in a distributed, durable, and fault-tolerant cluster, ensuring data integrity and availability. - High Availability: The platform supports efficient stretching of clusters over availability zones and connects separate clusters across geographic regions, enhancing resilience. - Stream Processing: Kafka provides built-in stream processing capabilities through the Kafka Streams API, allowing for operations like joins, aggregations, filters, and transformations with event-time processing and exactly-once semantics. - Connectivity: With Kafka Connect, it integrates seamlessly with hundreds of event sources and sinks, including databases, messaging systems, and cloud storage services. Primary Value and Solutions Provided: Apache Kafka addresses the challenges of managing real-time data streams by offering a unified platform that combines messaging, storage, and stream processing. It enables organizations to: - Build Real-Time Data Pipelines: Facilitate the continuous flow of data between systems, ensuring timely and reliable data delivery. - Implement Streaming Analytics: Analyze and process data streams in real-time, allowing for immediate insights and actions. - Ensure Data Integration: Seamlessly connect various data sources and sinks, promoting a cohesive data ecosystem. - Support Mission-Critical Applications: Provide a robust and fault-tolerant infrastructure capable of handling high-volume and high-velocity data, essential for critical business operations. By leveraging Kafka's capabilities, organizations can modernize their data architectures, enhance operational efficiency, and drive innovation through real-time data processing and analytics.


Categories in common with HiveMQ: [Message Queue (MQ)](https://www.g2.com/categories/message-queue-mq)

**Compare:** [HiveMQ vs Apache Kafka](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-hivemq)
**Compare Apache Kafka with other alternatives:**
- [Apache Kafka vs EMQX](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-emqx)
- [Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-mulesoft-anypoint-platform)
- [Apache Kafka vs SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-sap-integration-suite)
- [Apache Kafka vs Portainer](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-portainer)
- [Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-rabbitmq)
- [Apache Kafka vs Geotab](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-geotab)
- [Apache Kafka vs Particle](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-particle)
- [Apache Kafka vs IBM MQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-kafka-vs-ibm-mq)
- [Apache Kafka vs Apache ActiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-activemq-vs-apache-kafka)


---
## HiveMQ Alternatives FAQs

### How does HiveMQ compare to EMQX?

According to G2, [HiveMQ](https://www.g2.com/products/hivemq/reviews) and [EMQX](https://www.g2.com/products/emqx/reviews) both offer strong MQTT broker solutions with high user satisfaction, reflected in their average ratings of 4.5/5 from 87 reviews for HiveMQ and 4.6/5 from 23 reviews for EMQX. HiveMQ scores higher in meeting requirements (9.4 vs 9.0), support (9.1 vs 8.3), ease of setup (8.8 vs unreported), ease of administration (8.8 vs unreported), and ease of doing business (9.3 vs unreported). EMQX holds a 0.2-point lead in usability (9.2 vs 9.0). HiveMQ is praised for its exceptional reliability, scalability, and enterprise-grade security, with 20 mentions of reliability and 10 mentions of security, handling millions of concurrent connections and high message volumes with minimal latency. HiveMQ also offers detailed monitoring and real-time tracking features, supported by 14 and 9 mentions respectively. EMQX provides unique features not available in HiveMQ, including Account Alerts, Available Bandwidth, Cost Analytics, SIM Management, and Subscription Billing, which may appeal to users needing these capabilities. HiveMQ users note a steeper learning curve and higher cost, especially for smaller projects, while EMQX users highlight easier setup and strong performance with lower system loads. Overall, HiveMQ excels in large-scale, enterprise deployments with advanced features and robust support, whereas EMQX offers competitive usability and specific feature advantages.



### What are the best alternatives to HiveMQ?

The best alternatives to HiveMQ include [EMQX](https://www.g2.com/products/emqx/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 23 reviews), [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/mulesoft-anypoint-platform/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 765 reviews), [SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-integration-suite/reviews) (4.3/5 stars, 339 reviews), and [Portainer](https://www.g2.com/products/portainer/reviews) (4.8/5 stars, 296 reviews). EMQX is praised for its scalability, reliability, and ease of setup. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API-led connectivity, integration capabilities, and ease of use. SAP Integration Suite offers deep SAP integration, prebuilt connectors, and strong monitoring. Portainer stands out for container management with an intuitive UI and ease of administration.



### What features do alternatives offer that HiveMQ does not?

Alternatives to HiveMQ offer features such as account alerts, available bandwidth monitoring, cost analytics, SIM management, and subscription billing, which HiveMQ does not provide natively.



### Which Message Queue (MQ) tools do reviewers recommend instead of HiveMQ?

Reviewers recommend [EMQX](https://www.g2.com/products/emqx/reviews) for its high scalability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness, especially for IoT messaging. [MuleSoft Anypoint Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/mulesoft-anypoint-platform/reviews) is favored for enterprise-grade API lifecycle management and integration across diverse systems. [SAP Integration Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-integration-suite/reviews) is recommended for SAP-centric organizations needing robust, prebuilt integrations and monitoring. [Portainer](https://www.g2.com/products/portainer/reviews) is preferred for simplifying container orchestration with an easy-to-use interface and efficient management features. These tools are suggested as alternatives to HiveMQ based on their strong feature sets and positive user feedback.



### Why do users choose EMQX over HiveMQ?

Users choose [EMQX](https://www.g2.com/products/emqx/reviews) over HiveMQ primarily for its faster and simpler setup, as well as its strong performance with lower system resource usage. EMQX's integration capabilities with various databases such as MongoDB and PostgreSQL, along with its rule engine and message forwarding via connectors and REST API calls, provide flexible real-time data management. The flow designer feature further simplifies configuration. EMQX also offers unique features like Account Alerts, Available Bandwidth monitoring, Cost Analytics, SIM Management, and Subscription Billing, which are not available in HiveMQ, making it attractive for users requiring these functionalities. Additionally, EMQX's open-source version provides substantial features at a lower cost, appealing to users sensitive to enterprise pricing. These factors contribute to EMQX's appeal for users seeking a scalable, fast, and cost-effective MQTT broker solution with specific feature sets that support diverse IoT deployments.




## Explore Articles
- [What's the best low-code platform for custom app creation](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-low-code-platform-for-custom-app-creation)
- [Top MDM services for remote work teams](https://www.g2.com/discussions/choosing-the-right-mdm-services-for-remote-work-teams)
- [What is the best application portfolio management software for a mid-size IT shop trying to reduce legacy app sprawl without a multi-year transformation program?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-best-application-portfolio-management-software-for-a-mid-size-it-shop-trying-to-reduce-legacy-app-sprawl-without-a-multi-year-transformation-program)
- [Is a dedicated digital wayfinding platform worth the ongoing subscription for a mid-size hospital?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-a-dedicated-digital-wayfinding-platform-worth-the-ongoing-subscription-for-a-mid-size-hospital)
- [Which applicant tracking systems are the most reliable based on reviews from recruiting and hiring teams?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-ats-with-built-in-interview-scheduling-and-strong-candidate-communication-tools-in-one-place)
- [Which Oracle PeopleSoft resellers offer the strongest combination of HR, payroll, and talent capabilities for organisations comparing implementation partners?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-oracle-peoplesoft-resellers-offer-the-strongest-combination-of-hr-payroll-and-talent-capabilities-for-organisations-comparing-implementation-partners)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Session Replay Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/session-replay)
- [Project Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/project-management)
- [Event Registration and Ticketing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/event-registration-ticketing)