# Which database DevOps solution handles SQL Server and Postgres together reliably?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Curious to hear from teams managing mixed database environments: which database DevOps solution handles SQL Server and Postgres together reliably? Supporting both on paper is one thing; maintaining a consistent workflow across them is another.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/redgate-flyway/reviews"><strong>Redgate Flyway</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Uses the same migration-file model across SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and other databases.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/liquibase/reviews"><strong>Liquibase</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Supports 59+ databases through database-agnostic changesets, though multi-schema work may require several command-line calls.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/dbvisualizer/reviews"><strong>DbVisualizer</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Provides one workspace for migration, schema mapping, type conversion, and inspection.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sql-toolbelt-essentials/reviews"><strong>SQL Toolbelt Essentials</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Offers deep SQL Server functionality but is less suitable when PostgreSQL is equally important.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Liquibase appears strongest for shared deployment automation, while DbVisualizer fits cross-database management.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Where did the common workflow start to break down for your team?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Does handling both engines actually mean equal depth in both, or does one usually feel like the primary supported path and the other like an afterthought?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 9 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;The native-SQL distinction feels like where the shared workflow gets tested. Keeping deployment ordering consistent across both databases is useful, but engine-specific changes will always creep in. I’d be curious how teams using Liquibase or Flyway organize those exceptions without ending up with two mostly separate migration processes anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 13 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;The place a shared workflow usually strains is not the tool but the SQL itself. Database-agnostic changesets work well until you need something native to one engine, and then the abstraction becomes another layer to reason about. Teams running both often keep migrations in native SQL per database and use the tool purely for ordering and tracking, which keeps the workflow common without pretending the databases are.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

For mixed SQL Server and PostgreSQL environments, I&#39;d prioritize platforms that combine consistent cross-database workflows with reliable deployment validation. Liquibase, Redgate Flyway, and DbVisualizer seem to deliver the most dependable experience.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Jr. SEO Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4