BetterQA Reviews & Provider Details

Name: BetterQA
Rating: 5.0 (48 reviews)

BetterQA started with one belief: the people who build software should not be the ones who approve it. Our founder, Tudor Brad, began his career as the first QA engineer on a healthcare platform in Florida, back when the iPhone was new. In 2018, Tudor and Ana Brad founded BetterQA in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, with 5 engineers. Today we are 50+ engineers, with 170+ client projects since then for companies in the US and Europe. We are an independent software testing company. We only test, we never build the software we test. So we never mark our own homework, and nobody on our side has a reason to close a bug that makes the code look bad. That independence is the point. Teams work with us for QA outsourcing in three ways. We can run a managed testing team that owns strategy, people, tools, and reporting. We can add dedicated engineers inside your team, under your own QA lead. Or we can do project-based testing with a clear end date. Our engineers stay long-term on one client's project, and a team can usually start within two weeks. We cover functional, mobile, API, performance, usability, and IoT testing, test automation, agentic QA, and security testing. Our clients work in fintech and banking, insurance, healthcare and medtech, energy, defence, SaaS, e-commerce, media and education. Most QA companies use tools. We build them. So far, we have built 8 proprietary tools. 5 of them support our testing work every day. BugBoard handles test management, generates test cases from code changes, and pushes bugs to Jira. Flows records browser tests once and repairs them when the page changes, with export to Cypress, Selenium, and Playwright. Auditi audits user journeys for WCAG, GDPR and FDA compliance. The AI Security Toolkit runs our own checks alongside 15 open-source scanners. BetterFlow links commits, Jira tickets and logged hours, so clients see exactly what they pay for. These 5 come included with our services, with no per-seat licences, and clients keep every test we write. The other three are Scanner, for website SEO and GEO health checks, JRNY, our own sales CRM, and Hireo, the recruitment platform we use to screen hundreds of CVs every month. BugBoard, Flows, Scanner, and the Security Toolkit connect to AI coding assistants through MCP, so developers can use them without leaving their IDE. Our work is backed by ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 13485, and ISO 14001 certifications and a NATO NCIA Basic Ordering Agreement (NCAGE 1JGAL). You ship fast. We make sure it holds.

Seller

BetterQA

Discussions

BetterQA Community

Languages Supported

German, English, French, Romanian, Spanish

Services Offered

QA Process Consulting, Manual Testing, Test Automation, Performance Testing, Security Testing

Locations Serviced

Romania, Austria, Belgium, Canada, + 18 more

Overview by

Tudor Brad

Used by Aline and 2 others

Beta

Pricing

Pricing provided by BetterQA.

Custom Plan

Contact vendor for details.

Flat Rate Per Month

View More Pricing Information

BetterQA Integrations

(3)

Verified by BetterQA

G2 reviews are authentic and verified.

Here's how.

Rudra P.

Founder

Computer Software

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

8/25/2026

"A Better View of how Our Application Behaves under Real Usage Pressure"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

I appreciated that BetterQA connected the testing to actual application behavior instead of treating performance as a single number. Their work helped us see where response times changed as activity increased and gave the technical team clearer information to use when reviewing application performance and potential improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

The testing required some preparation before BetterQA could build meaningful performance conditions around the application. We needed to identify the workflows that mattered most and provide technical context, so the process wasn't completely plug-and-play. That preparation was worthwhile because it kept the testing relevant to the software we were developing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I'd suggest BetterQA when a development team needs evidence about how its application will behave beyond ordinary usage. Their performance testing can give developers another perspective on responsiveness and stability, making it easier to identify areas that deserve optimization before increased activity exposes them to users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

We needed more than routine functional checks to understand how the application would behave when several users were active at once. BetterQA carried out performance testing against the relevant workflows and reviewed the application's response under increased activity, giving our development team useful evidence for areas that needed attention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Douglas R.

Media Theorist

Information Technology and Services

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

8/25/2026

"Building a More Dependable Testing Routine for an Evolving Digital Product"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

What I liked most was the practical focus of BetterQA's automation work. The tests were built around functionality that mattered to the product rather than being treated as a separate technical exercise. Having those checks available for repeated runs gave the QA and development teams a more consistent way to verify existing functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

The automation needed some refinement whenever the product workflow changed significantly. We had to keep certain checks aligned with updated behavior, which meant some ongoing attention from the team. Still, that maintenance was reasonable compared with repeatedly performing the same verification manually whenever a new version was prepared. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I’d recommend BetterQA to teams that want to take some of the pressure off their QA cycle as their product grows. Their automation support can make recurring checks easier to handle and help the team catch unintended changes without having to start the same testing process from scratch each time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

As the product continued to change, repeatedly checking the same functionality manually was becoming harder to manage. BetterQA helped establish automated tests around selected workflows, giving the team reusable checks that could be run again after changes and making it easier to spot regressions before they moved further through development. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Gemma H.

Business Development Manager

Retail

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

8/24/2026

"A Fresh Security Review that Exposed Areas We had Not Examined Closely Enough"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

The biggest value was the detail behind the findings. BetterQA's testing gave the technical team something concrete to investigate instead of simply saying that an area might be vulnerable. Being able to understand the observed behavior made conversations around remediation much more productive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

Some findings took a little time to work through because our developers needed to trace the behavior back through the application before deciding on the right correction. That meant a few additional review conversations, although the detail provided by BetterQA made those discussions considerably easier to handle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I'd look at BetterQA when a retail business wants security testing performed by a team that can approach the application independently. Having another set of eyes examine security related behavior can uncover areas an internal team may naturally overlook and provide useful direction for subsequent improvements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

We wanted someone outside our normal development cycle to challenge the application's security rather than having the same team review its own work. BetterQA approached the platform from a security testing perspective, helping bring attention to application behavior and access scenarios that deserved a closer technical review. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Natalie P.

Talent Partner

Retail

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

8/19/2026

"Making repeated QA Checks Easier to Manage across our Digital Retail Platform"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

What worked well was the practical way the automation fitted into our existing QA routine. Instead of treating every release as a completely new testing exercise, we had repeatable checks available for established functionality. That gave the development team another useful signal when reviewing changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

Getting the automated checks to reflect the exact behavior we expected took some discussion at the beginning. We had to clarify certain workflow details before the tests were useful, so there was some initial coordination involved. Once those expectations were clear, the process became much easier to manage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I would consider BetterQA for retail technology teams dealing with frequent platform updates and repetitive regression work. Having reusable automated checks can make ongoing QA more manageable and give developers an additional way to notice when a new change has affected functionality that was previously working. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

Frequent product changes meant the same customer facing areas had to be checked repeatedly, and this was becoming difficult to manage manually. BetterQA helped us introduce automated checks around selected workflows, giving the team a quicker way to revisit those areas whenever new changes were introduced. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kashyap D.

Founder

Computer Software

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

8/19/2026

"Creating a more Organized QA Approach across an Active Software Development Cycle"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

The useful part was the focus on how QA fits into the development process rather than treating testing as a final step. BetterQA can help teams look at how requirements, defects, retesting, and release checks connect, giving developers and QA teams a more structured way to work together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

Introducing a more structured QA process can require teams to adjust habits that have become familiar over time. Some discussions may take longer while responsibilities and review steps are clarified, but that initial adjustment can make future testing activities easier to coordinate and less dependent on individual working styles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I'd recommend BetterQA to software teams that want to strengthen the way quality is managed throughout development. Their process-focused approach can help bring greater structure to testing activities, improve communication around defects, and make it easier for teams to maintain consistent QA practices as projects evolve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

Managing testing alongside ongoing development can become difficult when bugs, retesting, and release decisions are handled differently across projects. BetterQA's QA process consulting can help establish clearer testing practices, improve how issues move between teams, and make quality checks easier to follow throughout development. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hannah G.

Chief Executive Officer

Retail

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

8/18/2026

"Finding Performance Bottlenecks that Could Affect a Smoother online Shopping Experience"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

I appreciated the practical information produced from the testing rather than receiving a simple pass-or-fail result. The feedback helped us understand which areas deserved closer technical attention and gave the development team something concrete to work with when reviewing application performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

The testing process required a little back-and-forth when clarifying which application activities were most important to reproduce. That added some communication during the engagement, but it also helped keep the testing focused on meaningful customer interactions instead of spending time on less relevant scenarios. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I'd recommend BetterQA when a retail technology team wants deeper visibility into how its digital platform performs beyond everyday functional testing. Their performance work can help uncover bottlenecks, support better technical decisions, and reduce the chance of performance-related issues affecting the online customer experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

Some parts of a digital retail experience can feel perfectly fine during ordinary use but behave differently when several requests are processed together. BetterQA's performance testing helped examine those situations more closely, giving the team useful information about where processing delays or resource pressure could develop. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Darren B.

Founder

Retail

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

8/18/2026

"Strengthening Digital Security through Practical testing of Potential Application Weaknesses"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

The value came from having security examined from a testing perspective rather than relying only on our existing development checks. Findings could be reviewed with the technical team and used to understand where application behavior or access controls might require closer attention, making security discussions more practical. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

Security testing required some additional coordination because findings needed to be reviewed carefully with the relevant technical people before decisions could be made. That added another step to the process, but it also encouraged more thorough discussion around the risks and how they should be addressed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

BetterQA is worth considering for retail businesses that depend on digital systems and want an independent layer of security validation. Their testing can help uncover weaknesses that ordinary functional checks may not reveal and give technical teams useful information for strengthening the application before issues become more serious. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

Security issues can be difficult to spot through normal functional testing, particularly when applications handle customer accounts, business information, or connected services. BetterQA's security testing provided an additional review of potential weaknesses and gave the technical team clearer areas to investigate and strengthen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jepson T.

CEO

Information Technology and Services

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

8/13/2026

"Using Performance Testing to Reduce the Risk of Performance Issues Reaching Production"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

The most useful part was seeing performance treated as something that needed to be validated rather than assumed. BetterQA's testing gave our team a clearer understanding of how the application behaved under demanding conditions and helped direct technical attention toward areas that could affect reliability when the product was under greater strain. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

The testing required us to spend additional time preparing realistic conditions and reviewing the technical findings with the development team. It made the process more involved than a routine functional check, but the added preparation helped ensure that performance concerns were evaluated in a way that was relevant to the actual product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

I'd recommend BetterQA to software and technology teams where application reliability has a direct effect on business operations. Their performance testing provides another layer of confidence before production and can help teams address potential performance concerns before they become disruptive for users or the business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

For a technology product, a performance problem appearing after release can affect more than user experience; it can interrupt important business activity. BetterQA helped us examine how the application responded under increased activity, giving the technical team useful insight into potential pressure points before they could become production concerns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jamil B.

Group CEO

Food & Beverages

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

8/13/2026

"Manual Testing That Helped Strengthen Key Customer and Ordering Workflows"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

A strong part of the engagement was the practical testing approach. Rather than checking only the expected path, the testers explored different user actions and combinations of steps. This type of hands-on review can reveal issues that are easy to overlook during routine internal checks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

Some findings may require developers to revisit functionality that had already been reviewed internally, creating additional coordination before everything can be closed. However, that extra review can be worthwhile when it confirms that a fix works properly across the wider customer journey. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

BetterQA can be a good fit for food and beverage companies that rely on digital customer experiences and want another layer of manual validation. Their testing approach can help uncover unexpected behavior, improve workflow reliability, and give development teams clearer feedback before updates reach users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

Manual testing can be valuable when digital ordering and customer workflows behave differently depending on how users interact with them. BetterQA can help identify unexpected behavior across navigation, product selection, forms, and checkout, giving the development team clearer issues to investigate before release. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Durga G.

Co-Founder

Information Technology and Services

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

8/12/2026

"Bringing Greater Visibility and Structure to Our Software Quality Process"

5/5

What do you like best about BetterQA?

I liked the level of accountability they brought to the engagement. Testing work was easier to follow because activities and findings were connected to the development process rather than being handled separately. That gave our team a clearer picture of progress and made conversations around outstanding QA work much more productive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about BetterQA?

The more structured approach meant we sometimes had to provide additional context around development tasks before certain QA items could be properly reviewed. It required a little more coordination from our side, but it also made the testing process more organized and reduced ambiguity around what had actually been validated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering BetterQA:

For IT teams managing multiple development and QA activities, BetterQA can provide useful structure around the quality process. Their approach helped improve visibility into testing work, created clearer accountability, and gave our team a more organized way to follow quality-related tasks from development through validation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is BetterQA solving and how is that benefiting you?

Keeping QA activities organized across development work can become difficult when several tasks are moving at the same time. BetterQA helped bring more structure to how testing activities were tracked and reviewed, making it easier to understand what had been covered, what still needed attention, and where follow-up was required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.