Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Performance Testing and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
Performance Testing
Star Rating
(11)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Performance Testingmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that mabl excels in ease of use with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a user-friendly interface, while Performance Testing has a lower score of 7.8, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users report that mabl's automation capabilities shine with a reliability score of 9.0, which is crucial for teams that rely on consistent test execution, whereas Performance Testing lacks in this area with a lower reliability score.
- G2 users highlight mabl's strong test feedback feature, scoring 9.1, which allows teams to quickly identify issues and improve their testing processes, while Performance Testing's feedback mechanisms are not as robust, leading to potential delays in issue resolution.
- Users on G2 mention that mabl offers excellent customization options with a score of 8.8, allowing teams to tailor their testing environments effectively, whereas Performance Testing's customization features are perceived as limited, which may hinder flexibility.
- Reviewers say that mabl's reporting capabilities are impressive, scoring 9.0, providing clear insights into test results, while Performance Testing's reporting features are less comprehensive, making it harder for teams to analyze their testing outcomes.
- Users report that mabl has a strong product direction with a positive score of 8.7, indicating ongoing improvements and updates, while Performance Testing received a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting a very clear and promising roadmap for future enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Performance Testing
No pricing availablemabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Performance Testing
No trial information availablemabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
6
8.6
28
Ease of Use
7.8
6
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.2
6
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
5
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Reporting
9.0
5
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Performance Testing and mabl are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Performance Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Performance Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.4%
Information Services
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
9.1%
Other
27.3%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Performance Testing has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
