Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Pentera and Picus Security 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hackrate Ethical Hacking Platform
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (38.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Pentera
Star Rating
(143)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PenteraPicus Security
Star Rating
(216)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Picus SecuritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Picus Security excels in ease of use with a score of 9.7, making it highly intuitive for security teams. In contrast, Pentera, with a score of 8.7, is noted to have a steeper learning curve, which some users find challenging.
- Reviewers mention that Picus Security's automated testing feature scores 9.4, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows. Pentera, while also strong in this area with a score of 9.2, is perceived to require more manual intervention, which can slow down processes.
- G2 users highlight that Picus Security's attack simulation capabilities are rated at 9.7, providing a comprehensive range of scenarios that closely mimic real-world attacks. Pentera, with a score of 9.2, offers solid simulation options but lacks some of the depth found in Picus's offerings.
- Users on G2 report that Picus Security's quality of support is exceptional, scoring 9.6, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team. Pentera, while still good at 9.1, has received feedback indicating longer response times during peak periods.
- Reviewers mention that Picus Security shines in risk evaluation with a score of 9.4, providing detailed insights that help organizations prioritize vulnerabilities effectively. Pentera's score of 8.4 indicates it offers valuable insights but may not be as comprehensive in its analysis.
- Users say that Picus Security's reporting features, rated at 8.7, are user-friendly and customizable, allowing teams to generate tailored reports easily. In comparison, Pentera's reporting, with a score of 7.9, is seen as less flexible, which can hinder the ability to present findings in a preferred format.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Pentera
No pricing availablePicus Security
No pricing availableFree Trial
Pentera
No trial information availablePicus Security
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
105
9.5
210
Ease of Use
8.7
137
9.5
214
Ease of Setup
8.1
127
9.3
212
Ease of Admin
8.7
94
9.4
161
Quality of Support
9.1
103
9.7
209
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
89
9.6
163
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
107
9.9
211
Features by Category
Administration
7.3
48
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
48
Not enough data
Analysis
7.9
50
Not enough data
8.5
45
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
Testing
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
48
Not enough data
8.5
51
Not enough data
Performance
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
Network
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Application
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Simulation
8.4
35
9.4
197
Feature Not Available
9.6
198
9.0
35
9.6
198
8.8
33
9.3
194
Customization
8.6
33
9.3
197
8.6
34
9.3
194
8.7
34
9.5
194
Administration
7.9
37
9.1
197
8.4
35
9.4
196
9.1
32
9.5
197
Risk Analysis
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.0
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
Vulnerability Assesment
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.1
24
Not enough data
7.8
23
Not enough data
Automation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Configuration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Visibility
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Asset Management
8.4
45
Not enough data
7.3
44
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.3
42
Not enough data
7.8
39
Not enough data
7.9
42
Not enough data
Risk Management
8.2
47
Not enough data
8.6
47
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
47
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Orchestration
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Information
8.0
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Personalization
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Threat Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Pentera and Picus Security are categorized as Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
Unique Categories
Picus Security has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Pentera
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Picus Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Banking
9.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.6%
Manufacturing
7.9%
Financial Services
5.7%
Computer & Network Security
5.7%
Other
62.9%
Information Technology and Services
18.5%
Computer & Network Security
18.1%
Telecommunications
6.9%
Banking
6.5%
Consulting
6.0%
Other
44.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Pentera has no discussions with answers
Picus Security has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
