When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found mabl easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with mabl overall.
Reviewers felt that Opentext functional Testing meets the needs of their business better than mabl.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that mabl is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of mabl over Opentext functional Testing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing available
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.