Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Opentext functional Testing and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testingmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText UFT One excels in its comprehensive test history feature, allowing teams to track and analyze past test executions effectively, although some reviewers mention that the interface can be less intuitive compared to mabl.
- Reviewers mention that mabl shines in ease of use, with a user-friendly interface that simplifies the setup process, making it particularly appealing for mid-market companies looking for quick deployment.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText UFT One offers robust customization options, enabling teams to tailor their testing environments extensively, while users on G2 note that mabl provides a more streamlined approach with less complexity in customization.
- Users say that mabl's reporting capabilities are superior, with features that allow for real-time insights and automated reporting, which reviewers find particularly beneficial for agile development environments.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText UFT One has a strong focus on stress testing and extreme cases, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications that require rigorous testing under high load conditions.
- Users report that mabl's reliability is a standout feature, with many noting that it consistently delivers accurate results and minimizes false positives, which is crucial for maintaining quality in continuous integration pipelines.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availablemabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availablemabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
8.6
28
Ease of Use
8.1
39
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.5
38
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
8
9.1
17
7.9
8
9.2
17
8.1
8
8.8
17
8.3
8
8.5
17
Automation
8.1
8
8.3
16
7.7
8
9.0
17
8.1
8
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
