Compare Opentext functional Testing and mabl

At a Glance
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testing
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(39)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl

Opentext functional Testing vs mabl

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found mabl easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with mabl overall.

  • Reviewers felt that Opentext functional Testing meets the needs of their business better than mabl.
  • When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that mabl is the preferred option.
  • For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of mabl over Opentext functional Testing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing available
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
8.6
29
Ease of Use
8.1
39
9.0
29
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
8.9
12
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.5
38
9.1
29
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
8.7
27
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
9
9.0
18
Functionality
8.1
8
9.1
17
7.9
8
9.2
17
8.1
8
8.8
17
8.3
8
8.5
17
Automation
8.1
8
8.3
16
7.7
8
9.0
17
8.1
8
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing
mabl
mabl
Opentext functional Testing and mabl are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
24.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
22.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.3%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
37.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
43.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
18.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Education Management
4.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Other
33.3%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
29.7%
Airlines/Aviation
5.4%
Computer & Network Security
5.4%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.4%
Insurance
5.4%
Other
48.6%
Alternatives
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing Alternatives
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Add Ranorex Studio
Tricentis Tosca
Tricentis Tosca
Add Tricentis Tosca
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
mabl
mabl Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
Opentext functional Testing
Opentext functional Testing Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
Shreya Z.
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more