Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare OpenText Static Application Security Testing and Source Insight

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Source Insight
Source Insight
Star Rating
(26)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Source Insight
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Source Insight excels in ease of use with a score of 9.6, making it highly accessible for developers, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, with a score of 8.7, is noted to have a steeper learning curve, particularly for new users.
  • Reviewers mention that Source Insight's API and integrations score an impressive 9.0, allowing for seamless connectivity with other tools, whereas OpenText Fortify's extensibility is rated at 8.7, indicating it may not integrate as fluidly with certain environments.
  • G2 users highlight Source Insight's strong reporting and analytics capabilities with a score of 8.3, which helps teams visualize code quality effectively, while OpenText Fortify's issue tracking is rated lower at 7.8, suggesting it may lack some advanced tracking features that users desire.
  • Users on G2 indicate that Source Insight shines in static code analysis with a score of 8.7, providing detailed insights into code quality, whereas OpenText Fortify's static code analysis is rated at 8.3, which may not be as comprehensive according to some reviewers.
  • Reviewers mention that Source Insight's command-line tools score 7.9, which some users find useful for automation, while OpenText Fortify's test automation is rated higher at 8.5, indicating it may offer more robust automation features for testing processes.
  • Users say that Source Insight has a higher detection rate at 8.3, which is crucial for identifying potential issues early, while OpenText Fortify's false positives score of 6.5 suggests that users may encounter more irrelevant alerts, potentially leading to frustration during the development process.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing available
Source Insight
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information available
Source Insight
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
15
8.8
14
Ease of Use
8.7
15
9.6
16
Ease of Setup
8.3
9
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
9
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
15
8.7
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
13
9.2
15
Features by Category
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.1
13
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Analysis
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
Testing
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.2
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Code AnalysisHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Source Insight
Source Insight
OpenText Static Application Security Testing and Source Insight are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Source Insight
Source Insight has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
28.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
47.6%
Source Insight
Source Insight
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.7%
Reviewers' Industry
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Source Insight
Source Insight
Wireless
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Semiconductors
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
8.3%
Other
37.5%
Alternatives
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing Alternatives
SonarQube
SonarQube
Add SonarQube
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
Checkmarx
Checkmarx
Add Checkmarx
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
Source Insight
Source Insight Alternatives
SonarQube
SonarQube
Add SonarQube
Understand
Understand
Add Understand
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
ReSharper
ReSharper
Add ReSharper
Discussions
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing Discussions
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
Sandra H.
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
Vis C.
VC
Fortify SSC server Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Source Insight
Source Insight Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Source Insight has no discussions with answers