Compare Mend.io and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$300.00 1 Contributing Developer (CDs) Per Year
No pricing available
Mend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$300.00 1 Contributing Developer (CDs) Per Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingMend.io vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Static Application Security Testing easier to use and set up. However, Mend.io is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Mend.io overall.
- Reviewers felt that Mend.io meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Static Application Security Testing.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, Mend.io and OpenText Static Application Security Testing provide similar levels of assistance.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OpenText Static Application Security Testing over Mend.io.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mend.io
Mend AI Premium
$300.00
1 Contributing Developer (CDs) Per Year
Secure AI powered applications.
AI red teaming, prompt hardening & more
- AI component inventory
- AI component risk insights
- System Prompt Hardening
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
81
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.3
82
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.1
50
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.2
50
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.7
67
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
46
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
75
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
7.6
7
8.9
9
7.7
8
8.7
10
Analysis
7.3
11
8.3
11
7.6
11
8.0
11
8.2
11
8.8
11
7.6
11
8.5
10
Testing
7.2
10
8.1
9
Feature Not Available
6.9
9
7.2
9
8.7
10
7.7
10
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
7.4
9
8.3
9
5.0
9
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.3
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Monitoring
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.5
45
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.2
45
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
8.6
45
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Protection - AI Security Solutions
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Runtime Monitoring - AI Security Solutions
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Policy Enforcement and Compliance - AI Security Solutions
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mend.io and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
