Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mend.io and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Mend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mend.ioOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mend.io excels in its user-friendly interface, with an Ease of Use score of 8.3, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a slightly higher score of 8.7, indicating a more intuitive experience for users navigating its features.
- Reviewers mention that Mend.io's API and integrations score of 7.8 may limit its flexibility compared to OpenText Fortify's impressive score of 9.0, which suggests a broader range of integration capabilities with other tools and platforms.
- G2 users highlight that Mend.io's Static Code Analysis functionality has a score of 8.2, which is commendable, but OpenText Fortify shines with a score of 8.7, indicating a more robust analysis capability that users find beneficial for identifying vulnerabilities in code.
- Users on G2 report that Mend.io's reporting and analytics feature scores 7.5, which may not meet the needs of all users, while OpenText Fortify's score of 8.3 suggests a more comprehensive and effective reporting system that aids in better decision-making.
- Reviewers mention that Mend.io's false positives score of 5.0 is a significant drawback, as it may lead to unnecessary alerts, whereas OpenText Fortify's score of 6.5 indicates a better performance in minimizing false positives, which is crucial for maintaining developer productivity.
- Users say that Mend.io's continuous monitoring feature scores 8.8, showcasing its effectiveness in ongoing security assessments, while OpenText Fortify's capabilities in this area are not as highlighted, suggesting that Mend.io may offer a more proactive approach to security management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mend.io
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
81
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.3
82
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.1
50
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.2
50
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.7
67
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
46
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
75
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
7.6
7
8.9
9
7.7
8
8.7
10
Analysis
7.3
11
8.3
11
7.6
11
8.0
11
8.2
11
8.8
11
7.6
11
8.5
10
Testing
7.2
10
8.1
9
Feature Not Available
6.9
9
7.2
9
8.7
10
7.7
10
8.5
8
Feature Not Available
7.0
9
7.4
9
8.3
9
5.0
9
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.5
45
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.2
45
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
8.6
45
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mend.io and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
Mend.io is categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
