Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mathematica and Scilab 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (57.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Mathematica
Star Rating
(86)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MathematicaScilab
Star Rating
(64)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (57.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScilabSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mathematica excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 8.5, while Scilab falls short with a score of 5.7, making Mathematica a better choice for users needing advanced modeling capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Mathematica's data visualization capabilities score 8.3, which is a strong point, whereas Scilab does not have a specific score listed, indicating a potential gap in this area for Scilab users.
- G2 users highlight that Mathematica's manufacturing process simulation is rated exceptionally high at 9.4, suggesting it is a robust tool for users in manufacturing, while Scilab's score of 7.1 indicates it may not meet the same level of user expectations.
- Users on G2 report that Scilab shines in multibody dynamics with a score of 8.0, which is slightly better than Mathematica's score of 7.9, making it a preferable option for users focused on this specific analysis.
- Reviewers say that Mathematica's ease of use is rated at 7.3, which is lower than Scilab's 8.8, indicating that Scilab may provide a more user-friendly experience for new users or those less familiar with complex software.
- Users report that Mathematica's quality of support is rated at 7.9, while Scilab's is slightly higher at 8.2, suggesting that Scilab may offer better customer service and support resources for its users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mathematica
No pricing availableScilab
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mathematica
No trial information availableScilab
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
78
9.0
42
Ease of Use
7.3
80
8.8
42
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.9
76
8.2
35
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
79
8.8
40
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.2
13
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Capabilities
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.0
17
Not enough data
8.1
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Methodology
Not enough data
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
8.3
18
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
8.5
8
5.7
7
8.1
9
7.8
10
8.7
10
8.0
10
8.8
8
8.1
7
Tools
8.8
8
8.6
7
8.1
8
7.2
10
7.9
8
8.0
9
Work
8.5
12
8.1
14
8.2
12
8.2
13
8.3
11
7.2
12
9.4
9
7.1
8
9.0
12
6.7
7
Environment
8.2
10
7.6
12
8.3
11
7.7
13
8.3
9
7.3
10
8.6
12
8.3
15
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mathematica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Scilab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
9.3%
Higher Education
8.1%
Computer Software
7.0%
Automotive
7.0%
Other
51.2%
Higher Education
21.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.5%
Computer Software
7.0%
Chemicals
7.0%
Research
5.3%
Other
49.1%
Discussions
Is Mathematica better than Matlab?
1 Comment
DS
no but in most of case is more useful
Read more
Mathematica has no more discussions with answers
Scilab has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
