Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Storage Protect and NetApp Backup and Recovery 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Tresorit
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Arpio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
IBM Storage Protect
Star Rating
(77)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Storage ProtectNetApp Backup and Recovery
Star Rating
(33)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about NetApp Backup and RecoverySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Storage Protect excels in File Server Backup with a score of 9.4, indicating a strong capability in handling file backups effectively, while NetApp Backup and Recovery also performs well but does not specify a score for this feature.
- Reviewers mention that NetApp Backup and Recovery shines in Disaster Recovery with a high score of 9.4, suggesting robust recovery options, whereas IBM Storage Protect has a lower score of 8.4 in the same category, indicating room for improvement.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Storage Protect's Backup Automation feature is rated at 8.8, showcasing its efficiency in automating backup processes, while NetApp's score of 8.1 suggests it may not be as streamlined in this area.
- Users on G2 report that NetApp Backup and Recovery offers superior Cloud Recovery capabilities with a score of 8.9, which is crucial for businesses looking to leverage cloud solutions, compared to IBM's score of 8.8.
- Reviewers say that IBM Storage Protect has a strong focus on Local Backup with a score of 9.3, making it a reliable choice for on-premises data protection, while NetApp's performance in this area is not explicitly rated.
- Users mention that the Quality of Support for NetApp Backup and Recovery is rated at 8.6, which is higher than IBM Storage Protect's score of 8.1, indicating that users may find better support experiences with NetApp.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Storage Protect
No pricing availableNetApp Backup and Recovery
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Storage Protect
No trial information availableNetApp Backup and Recovery
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
59
8.4
30
Ease of Use
7.4
60
8.1
30
Ease of Setup
6.9
44
8.0
26
Ease of Admin
7.3
44
7.9
26
Quality of Support
8.1
59
8.7
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.5
42
8.6
26
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
60
7.3
30
Features by Category
IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO)Hide 16 FeaturesShow 16 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Recovery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compatibility
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Management
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Compliance
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Backup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compatibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Online Backup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
Admin
8.5
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Database Backup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Management
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Disaster Recovery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Solution Provision
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Reliability
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Compatibility
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Storage Protect and NetApp Backup and Recovery are categorized as Server Backup, Online Backup, and Disaster Recovery
Unique Categories
IBM Storage Protect is categorized as Database Backup, Object Storage Solutions, IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO), and Data Replication
NetApp Backup and Recovery has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Storage Protect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
NetApp Backup and Recovery
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Hospital & Health Care
13.3%
Computer Software
8.3%
Banking
6.7%
Government Administration
5.0%
Other
48.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Financial Services
13.3%
Computer Software
10.0%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Law Practice
6.7%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Storage Protect has no discussions with answers
NetApp Backup and Recovery has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
