Compare Hbase and ScyllaDB

At a Glance
Hbase
Hbase
Star Rating
(114)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hbase
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Star Rating
(423)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDB
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that ScyllaDB excels in operational simplicity and cost efficiency, with users highlighting its ability to deliver high performance on fewer nodes, which significantly reduces infrastructure costs. In contrast, Hbase, while capable of processing billions of records, is noted for its complexity in setup and administration.
  • Users say that ScyllaDB's scalability is a standout feature, allowing for seamless orchestration of multiple events and low latency handling. Hbase, on the other hand, is praised for its fast record lookups using row keys, but some users find it less flexible in adapting to their specific workflow needs.
  • Reviewers mention that the quality of support from ScyllaDB is notably high, with many appreciating the company's engagement and commitment to user experience. Hbase users, while generally satisfied, report a more mixed experience with support, indicating room for improvement in this area.
  • According to verified reviews, ScyllaDB has a significantly higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong market presence and user approval. Hbase, while still respected, has a much lower G2 Score, suggesting that users may face more challenges in their day-to-day operations.
  • Users highlight that Hbase's strengths lie in its structured data storage capabilities for large tables, which can enhance query performance and aggregations. However, ScyllaDB's robust ecosystem and compatibility with Cassandra make it a more attractive option for those seeking a modern, efficient database solution.
  • G2 reviewers note that ScyllaDB's recent user feedback emphasizes its commitment to user experience, with employees being described as open and involved. This contrasts with Hbase, where users have expressed a desire for more proactive support and engagement from the development team.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hbase
No pricing available
ScyllaDB
No pricing available
Free Trial
Hbase
No trial information available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
90
8.8
331
Ease of Use
7.6
90
8.5
340
Ease of Setup
7.3
40
8.2
248
Ease of Admin
7.0
40
8.2
125
Quality of Support
7.6
82
8.6
310
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
34
8.7
105
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
85
9.0
322
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.6
189
Data Management
Not enough data
8.7
161
Not enough data
8.7
162
Availability
Not enough data
9.0
156
Not enough data
8.6
153
Not enough data
8.7
155
Performance
Not enough data
8.8
147
Security
Not enough data
8.4
140
Not enough data
8.5
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
142
Support
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
7.3
6
Not enough data
Storage
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Availability
8.6
6
Not enough data
6.1
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Performance
7.0
5
Not enough data
Security
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Wide Column DatabaseHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
Not enough data
8.4
86
Storage
Not enough data
8.5
69
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
77
Not enough data
8.7
70
Security
Not enough data
8.2
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
73
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
67
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.5
6
Database as a Service (DBaaS)Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
Not enough data
8.8
163
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
150
Not enough data
8.8
140
Not enough data
8.9
149
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.7
138
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
132
Availability
Not enough data
9.5
151
Not enough data
8.8
146
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.7
125
Not enough data
8.7
125
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
128
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Hbase
Hbase
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Hbase and ScyllaDB are categorized as Wide Column Database
Unique Categories
Hbase
Hbase is categorized as Columnar Databases
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Hbase
Hbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
26.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
50.5%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
41.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.6%
Reviewers' Industry
Hbase
Hbase
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Computer Software
22.3%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
6.8%
Financial Services
4.9%
Other
32.0%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Computer Software
30.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
6.1%
Education Management
3.7%
Banking
3.7%
Other
43.6%
Alternatives
Hbase
Hbase Alternatives
Snowflake
Snowflake
Add Snowflake
Google Cloud BigTable
BigTable
Add Google Cloud BigTable
Google Cloud BigQuery
Google Cloud BigQuery
Add Google Cloud BigQuery
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Add Amazon Redshift
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Alternatives
Couchbase
Couchbase
Add Couchbase
Cassandra
Cassandra
Add Cassandra
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
Redis Software
Redis Software
Add Redis Software
Discussions
Hbase
Hbase Discussions
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
Gerry E.
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/ Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Hbase has no more discussions with answers
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Discussions
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
Peter C.
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x • Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator) • Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers