Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Hbase and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Hbase
Star Rating
(114)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HbaseScyllaDB
Star Rating
(358)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hbase has a solid data replication feature with a score of 8.6, but ScyllaDB outshines it with a higher score of 8.7, indicating that ScyllaDB's data replication is more reliable and efficient according to user feedback.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB excels in ease of use with a score of 8.6 compared to Hbase's 7.6, suggesting that users find ScyllaDB's interface and functionality more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that ScyllaDB's auto recovery feature scores 7.4, which is significantly better than Hbase's lower score of 6.1, indicating that users feel more confident in ScyllaDB's ability to recover from failures.
- Users on G2 report that ScyllaDB's integrated cache feature scores 8.6, while Hbase's integrated cache is rated lower at 8.0, suggesting that ScyllaDB provides better performance in caching data for faster access.
- Reviewers say that Hbase's data types support is rated at 8.4, but ScyllaDB's support for data types is even better at 8.6, indicating that ScyllaDB offers a wider variety of data types for users to work with.
- Users say that ScyllaDB's query language is rated at 8.0, which is a significant improvement over Hbase's lower score of 6.6, suggesting that users find ScyllaDB's query capabilities more powerful and flexible.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hbase
No pricing availableScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Hbase
No trial information availableScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
90
8.8
302
Ease of Use
7.6
90
8.6
311
Ease of Setup
7.3
40
8.3
220
Ease of Admin
7.0
40
8.2
115
Quality of Support
7.6
82
8.5
282
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
34
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
85
9.2
294
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
144
Not enough data
8.7
149
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
8.6
143
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
141
Security
Not enough data
8.3
134
Not enough data
8.5
135
Not enough data
8.4
132
Not enough data
8.5
132
Support
Not enough data
8.5
129
Not enough data
8.5
136
Storage
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Availability
8.6
6
Not enough data
6.1
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Performance
7.0
5
Not enough data
Security
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
66
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
146
Not enough data
8.8
139
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.7
135
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
131
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
144
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
140
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
8.7
123
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
126
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Hbase and ScyllaDB are categorized as Wide Column Database
Unique Categories
Hbase is categorized as Columnar Databases
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Hbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Computer Software
22.3%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
6.8%
Financial Services
4.9%
Other
32.0%
Computer Software
29.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Financial Services
5.8%
Banking
3.7%
Education Management
3.5%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/
Read more
Hbase has no more discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
