G2 reviewers report that ScyllaDB excels in operational simplicity and cost efficiency, with users highlighting its ability to deliver high performance on fewer nodes, which significantly reduces infrastructure costs. In contrast, Hbase, while capable of processing billions of records, is noted for its complexity in setup and administration.
Users say that ScyllaDB's scalability is a standout feature, allowing for seamless orchestration of multiple events and low latency handling. Hbase, on the other hand, is praised for its fast record lookups using row keys, but some users find it less flexible in adapting to their specific workflow needs.
Reviewers mention that the quality of support from ScyllaDB is notably high, with many appreciating the company's engagement and commitment to user experience. Hbase users, while generally satisfied, report a more mixed experience with support, indicating room for improvement in this area.
According to verified reviews, ScyllaDB has a significantly higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong market presence and user approval. Hbase, while still respected, has a much lower G2 Score, suggesting that users may face more challenges in their day-to-day operations.
Users highlight that Hbase's strengths lie in its structured data storage capabilities for large tables, which can enhance query performance and aggregations. However, ScyllaDB's robust ecosystem and compatibility with Cassandra make it a more attractive option for those seeking a modern, efficient database solution.
G2 reviewers note that ScyllaDB's recent user feedback emphasizes its commitment to user experience, with employees being described as open and involved. This contrasts with Hbase, where users have expressed a desire for more proactive support and engagement from the development team.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hbase
No pricing available
ScyllaDB
No pricing available
Free Trial
Hbase
No trial information available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
90
8.8
331
Ease of Use
7.6
90
8.5
340
Ease of Setup
7.3
40
8.2
248
Ease of Admin
7.0
40
8.2
125
Quality of Support
7.6
82
8.6
310
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/
Read more
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.