Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GlusterFS and IBM Storage Ceph

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GlusterFS
GlusterFS
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GlusterFS
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph
Star Rating
(21)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (35.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Storage Ceph

GlusterFS vs IBM Storage Ceph

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found GlusterFS easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with GlusterFS overall.

  • Reviewers felt that IBM Storage Ceph meets the needs of their business better than GlusterFS.
  • When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IBM Storage Ceph is the preferred option.
  • For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IBM Storage Ceph over GlusterFS.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GlusterFS
No pricing available
IBM Storage Ceph
No pricing available
Free Trial
GlusterFS
No trial information available
IBM Storage Ceph
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
22
8.8
16
Ease of Use
8.0
24
7.9
16
Ease of Setup
7.8
20
6.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.0
20
7.3
11
Quality of Support
7.6
15
8.2
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
15
8.0
9
Product Direction (% positive)
4.4
23
10.0
15
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GlusterFS
GlusterFS
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph
GlusterFS and IBM Storage Ceph are categorized as Runtime
Unique Categories
GlusterFS
GlusterFS has no unique categories
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GlusterFS
GlusterFS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
44.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
22.2%
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
35.0%
Reviewers' Industry
GlusterFS
GlusterFS
Computer Software
22.2%
Information Technology and Services
7.4%
Hospitality
7.4%
Education Management
7.4%
Computer & Network Security
7.4%
Other
48.1%
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Telecommunications
20.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Computer & Network Security
10.0%
Retail
5.0%
Other
25.0%
Alternatives
GlusterFS
GlusterFS Alternatives
Apache Karaf
Apache Karaf
Add Apache Karaf
Diego
Diego
Add Diego
OpenEBS
OpenEBS
Add OpenEBS
Apache ServiceMix
Apache ServiceMix
Add Apache ServiceMix
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph Alternatives
Apache Karaf
Apache Karaf
Add Apache Karaf
Red Hat Runtimes
Red Hat Runtimes
Add Red Hat Runtimes
Quobyte
Quobyte
Add Quobyte
OpenEBS
OpenEBS
Add OpenEBS
Discussions
GlusterFS
GlusterFS Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
GlusterFS has no discussions with answers
IBM Storage Ceph
IBM Storage Ceph Discussions
Send me E-Magazines related to Supporting and Troubleshooting ..eg. FAQ
1 Comment
what is the best way to implement Ceph with kubernetes?
1 Comment
Amelia j.
AJ
Kubernetes service is easy to use & scale at transparent pricesRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM Storage Ceph has no more discussions with answers