Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Git and Mercurial 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Git
Star Rating
(498)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GitMercurial
Star Rating
(31)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MercurialSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Git's "branching and merging" capabilities are superior, allowing for more complex workflows, while Mercurial's "branching model" is simpler but can be limiting for advanced users.
- Reviewers mention that Git's "community support" is extensive, with a wealth of resources and plugins available, whereas Mercurial users note that while support is good, it is not as vast as Git's.
- G2 users highlight that Git's "command line interface" can be daunting for beginners, but once mastered, it offers powerful features; in contrast, users on G2 find Mercurial's interface to be more user-friendly and accessible for newcomers.
- Users say that Git's "performance with large repositories" is often praised, making it a preferred choice for larger projects, while reviewers mention that Mercurial can struggle with performance in similar scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that Git's "integration with CI/CD tools" is robust, making it a favorite among developers, while users report that Mercurial's integrations are fewer, which can hinder workflow automation.
- Users report that Git's "staging area" feature allows for more granular control over commits, which is a significant advantage, while Mercurial's approach to commits is more straightforward but lacks this level of detail.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Git
No pricing availableMercurial
No pricing availableFree Trial
Git
No trial information availableMercurial
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.4
428
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.1
430
8.8
30
Ease of Setup
8.9
97
9.1
9
Ease of Admin
8.2
69
8.3
9
Quality of Support
8.7
345
7.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
54
8.1
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
418
6.8
29
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Git and Mercurial are categorized as Version Control Software
Unique Categories
Git has no unique categories
Mercurial has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Git
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mercurial
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.8%
Information Technology and Services
19.6%
Internet
9.3%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Education Management
2.9%
Other
30.3%
Information Technology and Services
25.8%
Computer Software
25.8%
Internet
16.1%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Research
3.2%
Other
22.6%
Discussions
What is Git used for?
3 Comments
TG
Version Control of your codebase and repositories.Read more
what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience
3 Comments
CA
The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. Read more
Mercurial has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
