# Git vs Mercurial Comparison --- ## AI Generated Summary - **G2 reviewers report** that Git excels in its ability to track changes and manage code versions effectively. Users appreciate features like branching and merge requests, which streamline collaboration and code review processes, making it a go-to tool for many development teams. - **Users say** Mercurial stands out for its intuitive interface and ease of use, particularly for those new to version control. Reviewers highlight its flexibility and the benefits of running a distributed version control system without needing extensive command line expertise. - **According to verified reviews** , Git has a significantly higher overall satisfaction score, indicating that users feel more positively about their experience with the platform. Many find it to be a reliable safety net for their projects, reinforcing their commitment to their work. - **Reviewers mention** that while Mercurial is praised for its simplicity, it has fewer recent reviews compared to Git, which may suggest a smaller user base or less active community engagement. This could impact the availability of support and resources for users seeking help. - **G2 reviewers highlight** Git's strong support quality, with users noting that the platform has been a good partner in their business endeavors. This contrasts with Mercurial, where users have expressed some concerns about the quality of support available. - **Users appreciate** the quick implementation process of Git, with many mentioning the intuitive onboarding experience that helps teams get started without a steep learning curve. In comparison, while Mercurial is easy to use, some users may find the initial setup less straightforward due to its unique features. | | Git | Mercurial | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.7 out of 5 | 4.2 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 530 | 31 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (35.7% of reviews) | Small-Business (54.8% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | Git | Mercurial | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 9.4 (459 reviews) | 8.6 (30 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.2 (461 reviews) | 8.8 (30 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | 9.0 (128 reviews) | 9.1 (9 reviews) | | **Ease of Admin** | 8.2 (72 reviews) | 8.3 (9 reviews) | | **Quality of Support** | 8.7 (373 reviews) | 7.6 (16 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.7 (57 reviews) | 8.1 (7 reviews) | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 9.1 (445 reviews) | 6.8 (29 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### Git #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### Mercurial #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available --- ## Categories **Shared Categories (1):** [Version Control Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | Git | Mercurial | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 35.7% | 54.8% | | **Mid-Market** | 29.1% | 35.5% | | **Enterprise** | 35.3% | 9.7% | ### By Industry #### Git - **Computer Software:** 33.1% - **Information Technology and Services:** 20.5% - **Internet:** 8.7% - **Marketing and Advertising:** 4.1% - **Computer & Network Security:** 2.9% - **Education Management:** 2.7% - **Higher Education:** 1.9% - **Financial Services:** 1.9% - **Computer Networking:** 1.7% - **Automotive:** 1.4% - **Other:** 20.9% #### Mercurial - **Information Technology and Services:** 25.8% - **Computer Software:** 25.8% - **Internet:** 16.1% - **Telecommunications:** 6.5% - **Research:** 3.2% - **Health, Wellness and Fitness:** 3.2% - **Education Management:** 3.2% - **Construction:** 3.2% - **Computer Games:** 3.2% - **Biotechnology:** 3.2% - **Other:** 6.5% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to Git - [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews) - [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (95 reviews) - [AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (87 reviews) - [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews) - [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) — 2.9/5 stars (40 reviews) - [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews) - [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews) - [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (13 reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews) - [Kiln](https://www.g2.com/products/kiln/reviews) — 5.0/5 stars (1 reviews) ### Alternatives to Mercurial - [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (198 reviews) - [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (95 reviews) - [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews) - [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (13 reviews) - [AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (87 reviews) - [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews) - [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) — 2.9/5 stars (40 reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews) - [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews) - [Kiln](https://www.g2.com/products/kiln/reviews) — 5.0/5 stars (1 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### Git - Title: [What is Git used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-git-used-for) — 4 comments, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "version control" - Title: [sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf](https://www.g2.com/discussions/sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf) — 2 comments, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "bad review" - Title: [what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience](https://www.g2.com/discussions/29849-what-is-the-most-channeling-use-of-git-in-your-experience) — 2 comments > **Top comment:** "The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. " ### Mercurial No discussions available for this product. --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-mercurial)