# Top 10 Mercurial Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 31 The Version Control Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with Mercurial. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Mercurial include files and version control. The best overall Mercurial alternative is Git. Other similar apps like Mercurial are Azure DevOps Server, P4, Subversion, and CVS. Mercurial alternatives can be found in [Version Control Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) but may also be in [Configuration Management Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/configuration-management) or [Continuous Integration Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/continuous-integration). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Mercurial - [Git](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews) - [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) - [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) - [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) - [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) - [AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) - [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) - [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) - [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to Mercurial Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Mercurial stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Information Technology and Services, Telecommunications, and Health, Wellness and Fitness, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Git](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews) By Git **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 535 Git is a fast, scalable, and distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Originally developed for the Linux kernel, Git has become the de facto standard for version control, utilized by millions of developers worldwide. Its distributed architecture allows each developer to have a complete history of the project, enabling robust collaboration and offline work capabilities. Key Features and Functionality: - Distributed Version Control: Every developer has a full copy of the repository, allowing for independent work and reducing reliance on a central server. - High Performance: Git is optimized for speed, efficiently handling large repositories with millions of files and commits. - Data Integrity: Every file and commit is checksummed and retrieved by its checksum, ensuring the integrity of the repository. - Branching and Merging: Git offers powerful branching and merging capabilities, facilitating parallel development and feature integration. - Staging Area: The staging area allows developers to prepare commits by selecting changes to include, providing greater control over the commit history. - Free and Open Source: Released under the GNU General Public License version 2.0, Git is free to use and modify, promoting collaboration and transparency. Primary Value and User Solutions: Git addresses the challenges of collaborative software development by providing a reliable and efficient system for tracking changes, coordinating work among multiple developers, and maintaining a comprehensive history of project evolution. Its distributed nature ensures that developers can work offline and merge changes seamlessly, reducing conflicts and enhancing productivity. By offering a robust set of tools for version control, Git empowers teams to manage their codebases effectively, leading to more stable and maintainable software projects. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, Git is: - More expensive - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-mercurial) **Compare Git with other alternatives:** - [Git vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-git) - [Git vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-p4) - [Git vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-subversion) - [Git vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-git) - [Git vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-git) - [Git vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-opentext-accurev) - [Git vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Git vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-harness-platform) - [Git vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-plastic-scm) ### 2. [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) By Microsoft **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 198 Azure DevOps Server, formerly known as Team Foundation Server (TFS), is a comprehensive on-premises solution developed by Microsoft for managing the entire application lifecycle. It integrates version control, project management, build automation, testing, and release management into a unified platform, facilitating collaboration among development teams. Designed to support both agile and waterfall methodologies, Azure DevOps Server enables organizations to plan, develop, test, and deliver software efficiently within their own infrastructure. Key Features and Functionality: - Version Control: Offers robust source code management through Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC) and Git, allowing teams to choose between centralized or distributed version control systems. - Project Management: Provides agile planning tools, including configurable Kanban boards and backlogs, to plan, track, and discuss work across teams. - Build Automation: Enables continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines to build, test, and deploy applications across various platforms and environments. - Testing: Includes manual and exploratory testing tools to ensure code quality and support the entire testing lifecycle. - Release Management: Facilitates controlled and automated deployment of applications to different environments, ensuring consistent and reliable releases. - Extensibility: Supports integration with various development environments, including Microsoft Visual Studio and Eclipse, and offers APIs for custom extensions. Primary Value and User Benefits: Azure DevOps Server addresses the challenges of managing complex software development projects by providing a centralized platform that enhances collaboration, streamlines workflows, and improves code quality. By integrating various development tools and processes, it reduces the overhead associated with managing multiple disparate systems. Organizations benefit from increased transparency, better project tracking, and faster delivery times, all while maintaining control over their data within their own infrastructure. This makes Azure DevOps Server particularly valuable for enterprises with strict compliance requirements or those operating in environments where cloud-based solutions are not feasible. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, Azure DevOps Server is: - More expensive - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-mercurial) **Compare Azure DevOps Server with other alternatives:** - [Azure DevOps Server vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-git) - [Azure DevOps Server vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-p4) - [Azure DevOps Server vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-subversion) - [Azure DevOps Server vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-cvs) - [Azure DevOps Server vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-azure-devops-server) - [Azure DevOps Server vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-opentext-accurev) - [Azure DevOps Server vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Azure DevOps Server vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-harness-platform) - [Azure DevOps Server vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-plastic-scm) ### 3. [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) By Perforce **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 95 P4 is an industrial-strength version control and collaboration platform that supports flexible workflows. P4 eliminates the complexity of large-scale, distributed product development – allowing you to build products faster while protecting your valuable IP. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, P4 is: - More expensive - Better at support - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/mercurial-vs-p4) **Compare P4 with other alternatives:** - [P4 vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-p4) - [P4 vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-p4) - [P4 vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/p4-vs-subversion) - [P4 vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-p4) - [P4 vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-p4) - [P4 vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-p4) - [P4 vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/p4-vs-rational-clearcase) - [P4 vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-p4) - [P4 vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/p4-vs-plastic-scm) ### 4. [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) By The Apache Software Foundation **Average Rating:** 3.9/5 **Total Reviews:** 64 Subversion is an open source version control system. Founded in 2000 by CollabNet, Inc., the Subversion project and software have seen incredible success over the past decade. Subversion has enjoyed and continues to enjoy widespread adoption in both the open source arena and the corporate world. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, Subversion is: - More expensive Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/mercurial-vs-subversion) **Compare Subversion with other alternatives:** - [Subversion vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/p4-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/rational-clearcase-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-subversion) - [Subversion vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/plastic-scm-vs-subversion) ### 5. [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) By FreeCAD **Average Rating:** 3.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 13 CVS is a version control system, an important component of Source Configuration Management (SCM). Using it, you can record the history of sources files, and documents. It fills a similar role to the free software RCS, PRCS, and Aegis packages. Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-mercurial) **Compare CVS with other alternatives:** - [CVS vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-git) - [CVS vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-cvs) - [CVS vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-p4) - [CVS vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-subversion) - [CVS vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-cvs) - [CVS vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-opentext-accurev) - [CVS vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-rational-clearcase) - [CVS vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-harness-platform) - [CVS vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-plastic-scm) ### 6. [AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) By Amazon Web Services (AWS) **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 87 AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, AWS CodeCommit is: - More expensive - Better at support - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-mercurial) **Compare AWS CodeCommit with other alternatives:** - [AWS CodeCommit vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-git) - [AWS CodeCommit vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-azure-devops-server) - [AWS CodeCommit vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-p4) - [AWS CodeCommit vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-subversion) - [AWS CodeCommit vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-cvs) - [AWS CodeCommit vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-opentext-accurev) - [AWS CodeCommit vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-rational-clearcase) - [AWS CodeCommit vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-harness-platform) - [AWS CodeCommit vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-plastic-scm) ### 7. [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) By OpenText **Average Rating:** 3.8/5 **Total Reviews:** 20 AccuRev is a software configuration management tool which addresses complex parallel and distributed development environments with its stream-based architecture, to accelerate your development process and improve asset reuse. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, OpenText AccuRev is: - More expensive - Better at support Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/mercurial-vs-opentext-accurev) **Compare OpenText AccuRev with other alternatives:** - [OpenText AccuRev vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-opentext-accurev) - [OpenText AccuRev vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-opentext-accurev) - [OpenText AccuRev vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-p4) - [OpenText AccuRev vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-subversion) - [OpenText AccuRev vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-opentext-accurev) - [OpenText AccuRev vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-opentext-accurev) - [OpenText AccuRev vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-rational-clearcase) - [OpenText AccuRev vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-opentext-accurev) - [OpenText AccuRev vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-plastic-scm) ### 8. [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) By IBM **Average Rating:** 2.9/5 **Total Reviews:** 40 IBM Rational ClearCase is a software configuration management solution that provides version control, workspace management, parallel development support, and build auditing. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, Rational ClearCase is: - More expensive Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/mercurial-vs-rational-clearcase) **Compare Rational ClearCase with other alternatives:** - [Rational ClearCase vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/p4-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/rational-clearcase-vs-subversion) - [Rational ClearCase vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Rational ClearCase vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/plastic-scm-vs-rational-clearcase) ### 9. [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) By Harness **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 281 Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably. Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, Harness Platform is: - More expensive - Better at support - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-mercurial) **Compare Harness Platform with other alternatives:** - [Harness Platform vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-harness-platform) - [Harness Platform vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-harness-platform) - [Harness Platform vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-p4) - [Harness Platform vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-subversion) - [Harness Platform vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-harness-platform) - [Harness Platform vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-harness-platform) - [Harness Platform vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-opentext-accurev) - [Harness Platform vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Harness Platform vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-plastic-scm) ### 10. [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) By Unity **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 36 Plastic SCM is a version control system that will help you develop new features in parallel, go distributed, merge in time, and never break a build again Reviewers say compared to Mercurial, Plastic SCM is: - More expensive - Better at support - Easier to do business with Categories in common with Mercurial: [Version Control Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software) **Compare:** [Mercurial vs Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/compare/mercurial-vs-plastic-scm) **Compare Plastic SCM with other alternatives:** - [Plastic SCM vs Git](https://www.g2.com/compare/git-vs-plastic-scm) - [Plastic SCM vs Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-plastic-scm) - [Plastic SCM vs P4](https://www.g2.com/compare/p4-vs-plastic-scm) - [Plastic SCM vs Subversion](https://www.g2.com/compare/plastic-scm-vs-subversion) - [Plastic SCM vs CVS](https://www.g2.com/compare/cvs-vs-plastic-scm) - [Plastic SCM vs AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-codecommit-vs-plastic-scm) - [Plastic SCM vs OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-accurev-vs-plastic-scm) - [Plastic SCM vs Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/compare/plastic-scm-vs-rational-clearcase) - [Plastic SCM vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-plastic-scm) ## Explore Articles - [Top-rated low-code software for mobile app development](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-rated-low-code-software-for-mobile-app-development) - [How to pick the best social media management tool](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-do-i-pick-one-from-the-available-best-social-media-management-tools) - [Top biometric authentication platforms for remote identity verification](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-biometric-authentication-platforms-for-remote-identity-verification) - [Best account-based analytics tools for pipeline attribution](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-account-based-analytics-tools-for-pipeline-attribution) - [What platform integrates visual collaboration with project management systems?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-integrates-visual-collaboration-with-project-management-features) - [What platform supports multi-source log aggregation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-supports-multi-source-log-aggregation) ## Spotlight Categories - [Restaurant POS Systems](https://www.g2.com/categories/restaurant-pos) - [Employee Engagement Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/employee-engagement) - [Contract Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/contract-management)