Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Firebase and Ruby on Rails 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
AwareIM
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Apromore
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (69.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0
No pricing available
Firebase
Star Rating
(287)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0
Browse all 4 pricing plansRuby on Rails
Star Rating
(81)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (69.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ruby on RailsFirebase vs Ruby on Rails
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Firebase easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Firebase overall.
- Reviewers felt that Firebase meets the needs of their business better than Ruby on Rails.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Firebase is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Firebase over Ruby on Rails.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ruby on Rails
No pricing availableFree Trial
Firebase
Free Trial is available
Ruby on Rails
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
225
8.7
67
Ease of Use
9.0
225
8.9
68
Ease of Setup
9.1
85
8.6
30
Ease of Admin
9.0
73
8.6
28
Quality of Support
8.5
200
8.4
60
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
67
8.7
23
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
215
8.4
67
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
64
Not enough data
8.9
61
Not enough data
8.8
54
Not enough data
8.4
61
Not enough data
8.9
62
Not enough data
8.9
64
Not enough data
8.8
61
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
7.8
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Firebase and Ruby on Rails share no categories
Unique Categories
Firebase is categorized as Application Development Platforms and Mobile Development Platforms
Ruby on Rails is categorized as Other Web Frameworks
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Firebase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Ruby on Rails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.1%
Information Technology and Services
25.9%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Computer Games
4.1%
Program Development
2.6%
Other
32.2%
Computer Software
25.4%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Internet
9.9%
Telecommunications
4.2%
Program Development
4.2%
Other
32.4%
Discussions
How can i make relation between two tables?
3 Comments
HS
You can simple add relations by adding reference to that documents
example code in JavaScript:
const sendContactUs = async (userData, uid) => {
...Read more
whats is the best approach to make a better database model?
1 Comment
HS
Use nested document structure. Dont make large documents and collectionsRead more
Is Ruby on Rails front end?
1 Comment
RR
Rails can be used as a front end application. Views (written as HTML with embeddable Ruby code) are a primary component of the framework. Read more
Ruby on Rails has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
