Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare FFmpeg and Zoom Player 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (100.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FFmpeg
Star Rating
(20)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FFmpegZoom Player
Star Rating
(1)3.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (100.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zoom PlayerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that FFmpeg excels in its versatility and powerful command-line capabilities, allowing for extensive video and audio format conversions, while Zoom Player is praised for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making it more accessible for non-technical users.
- Reviewers mention that FFmpeg has a steeper learning curve due to its reliance on command-line usage, which can be daunting for beginners, whereas Zoom Player's graphical user interface is intuitive, leading to a higher ease of use rating.
- G2 users highlight that FFmpeg's support for a wide range of codecs and formats is unmatched, making it a go-to choice for professionals needing advanced editing features, while users on G2 appreciate Zoom Player's robust playback capabilities and customization options for a more tailored viewing experience.
- Users say that FFmpeg's community support is strong, with numerous online resources and forums available, but they also note that official customer support can be lacking; in contrast, reviewers mention that Zoom Player offers better customer support, with quicker response times and more comprehensive help documentation.
- Reviewers mention that FFmpeg's product direction is seen as positive, with regular updates and improvements, while users report that Zoom Player's development pace is slower, leading to concerns about the introduction of new features and enhancements.
- Users on G2 indicate that while FFmpeg is highly regarded for its performance in batch processing and automation tasks, Zoom Player is favored for its seamless integration with various media libraries and streaming services, making it a more convenient choice for everyday media consumption.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FFmpeg
No pricing availableZoom Player
No pricing availableFree Trial
FFmpeg
No trial information availableZoom Player
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
17
Not enough data
Ease of Use
6.9
17
Not enough data
Ease of Setup
7.4
7
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
6.9
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.9
9
Not enough data
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
17
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FFmpeg and Zoom Player are categorized as Other Video
Unique Categories
FFmpeg has no unique categories
Zoom Player has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FFmpeg
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Zoom Player
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Computer Software
15.8%
Media Production
10.5%
Marketing and Advertising
10.5%
Semiconductors
5.3%
Other
42.1%
Computer Software
100.0%
‐
‐
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Why do you need FFmpeg?
1 Comment
AT
I have more options and control on video compression, especially when small file sizes are really needed.Read more
FFmpeg has no more discussions with answers
Zoom Player has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
