Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Django and jam.py 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Django
Star Rating
(173)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Djangojam.py
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about jam.pySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Django excels in its "Meets Requirements" rating with a score of 9.1, indicating that it effectively fulfills user needs, while jam.py has a slightly lower score of 8.7, suggesting some users feel it may not fully meet their expectations.
- Reviewers mention that jam.py shines in "Ease of Setup" with an impressive score of 9.8, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize quick deployment, whereas Django's score of 8.0 indicates a more complex setup process.
- G2 users highlight that Django has a strong "Quality of Support" rating of 8.3, but jam.py's score of 8.0 suggests that while support is adequate, it may not be as robust, leading to mixed experiences among users seeking assistance.
- Users on G2 report that jam.py has a superior "Ease of Admin" score of 9.7, which indicates a more user-friendly administrative interface compared to Django's score of 8.8, making jam.py more appealing for those who manage applications regularly.
- Reviewers say that both products have a star rating of 4.5, but the context differs; Django is favored by small businesses (47.9% of reviews), while jam.py is more popular among enterprises (63.6% of reviews), suggesting different target audiences and use cases.
- Users mention that Django's "Product Direction" score of 9.0 reflects a strong commitment to future development, while jam.py's perfect score of 10.0 indicates exceptional confidence in its ongoing improvements, which may influence long-term investment decisions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Django
No pricing availablejam.py
No pricing availableFree Trial
Django
No trial information availablejam.py
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
152
8.7
10
Ease of Use
8.6
153
8.8
10
Ease of Setup
8.1
59
9.8
8
Ease of Admin
8.8
52
9.7
5
Quality of Support
8.3
141
8.0
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
43
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
150
10.0
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Django and jam.py are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Django has no unique categories
jam.py has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Django
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
jam.py
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.0%
Information Technology and Services
16.1%
Internet
5.4%
Financial Services
4.2%
Education Management
4.2%
Other
42.3%
Computer Software
27.3%
Education Management
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Oil & Energy
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
27.3%
Discussions
What is the best way use?
3 Comments
SG
The most effective approach to utilizing the Django web framework involves several key practices to ensure successful web application development. Here are...Read more
What is Django used for?
2 Comments
AG
Short and simple answer, The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. Its great for developing backend and full stack applicationsRead more
Django has no more discussions with answers
jam.py has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
