Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare DerScanner and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
DerScanner
Star Rating
(11)5.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DerScannerOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer excels in its API and integrations, scoring a solid 9.0, while DerScanner takes the lead with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating a more seamless integration experience.
- Reviewers mention that the reporting and analytics capabilities of DerScanner are highly praised, achieving a score of 10.0, compared to OpenText's 8.3, suggesting that users find DerScanner's insights more actionable and comprehensive.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText Fortify's static code analysis is effective, scoring 8.7, but DerScanner outperforms with a score of 9.8, indicating a more thorough detection of vulnerabilities and issues in the code.
- Users on G2 appreciate the manual testing features of DerScanner, which received a perfect score of 10.0, while OpenText Fortify's manual testing scored lower at 7.7, suggesting that DerScanner provides a more robust manual testing environment.
- Reviewers say that OpenText Fortify's false positive rate is a concern, with a score of 6.5, while DerScanner's score of 9.4 indicates a more reliable detection process, leading to fewer unnecessary alerts for users.
- Users report that the overall ease of use for DerScanner is significantly higher, with a perfect score of 10.0, compared to OpenText Fortify's 8.7, making DerScanner a more user-friendly option for teams looking to implement static code analysis.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
DerScanner
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
DerScanner
No trial information availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
10.0
9
8.3
15
Ease of Use
10.0
9
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.1
9
Quality of Support
10.0
9
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
9
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
10.0
9
8.9
9
10.0
9
8.7
10
Analysis
10.0
7
8.3
11
9.8
8
8.0
11
9.8
8
8.8
11
10.0
6
8.5
10
Testing
9.4
6
8.1
9
Feature Not Available
6.9
9
Feature Not Available
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
10.0
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
9.8
9
Not enough data
10.0
9
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.8
8
Not enough data
9.8
8
Not enough data
Testing
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
10.0
8
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
DerScanner and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
DerScanner is categorized as Software Composition Analysis and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
DerScanner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.4%
Real Estate
18.2%
Consumer Electronics
18.2%
Restaurants
9.1%
Professional Training & Coaching
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
DerScanner has no discussions with answers
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
