Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Coverity and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Coverity
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CoverityOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Coverity excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.2, highlighting its ability to identify complex vulnerabilities effectively, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer scores 8.7, indicating it may not catch as many intricate issues.
- Reviewers mention that Coverity's API and Integrations score of 8.3 is slightly lower than OpenText Fortify's impressive 9.0, suggesting that Fortify offers more seamless integration capabilities with other tools and platforms.
- G2 users highlight that Coverity provides excellent documentation, with feedback and prioritization scores both at 9.3, which users say helps in understanding and utilizing the software effectively, whereas OpenText Fortify's documentation may not be as comprehensive.
- Users on G2 report that Coverity has a better detection rate of 8.9 compared to OpenText Fortify's 8.3, indicating that Coverity is more reliable in identifying security vulnerabilities during the code analysis process.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar scores for Quality of Support at 8.6, but users say that Coverity's support is often more responsive, making it a preferred choice for those needing timely assistance.
- Users report that Coverity's false positives score of 7.0 is a concern, as it indicates a higher rate of incorrect alerts compared to OpenText Fortify's 6.5, which may lead to unnecessary remediation efforts for users of Coverity.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Coverity
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
Coverity
No trial information availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
43
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.2
19
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.2
19
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
18
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
40
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
8.3
11
8.9
9
9.0
12
8.7
10
Analysis
8.9
11
8.3
11
8.8
11
8.0
11
9.2
11
8.8
11
8.9
11
8.5
10
Testing
8.5
11
8.1
9
8.5
8
6.9
9
8.5
10
8.7
10
9.1
11
8.5
8
8.8
10
7.0
9
8.9
11
8.3
9
7.6
12
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Security
7.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Coverity and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Coverity is categorized as Secure Code Review
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Coverity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Semiconductors
5.5%
Other
29.1%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Coverity has no discussions with answers
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
