Coverity vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Static Application Security Testing easier to use, set up, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of administration with Coverity.
Reviewers felt that Coverity meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Static Application Security Testing.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OpenText Static Application Security Testing is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OpenText Static Application Security Testing over Coverity.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Coverity
No pricing available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing available
Free Trial
Coverity
No trial information available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
43
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.2
19
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.2
19
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.