Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CMake and GNU Automake 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
CMake
Star Rating
(17)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CMakeGNU Automake
Star Rating
(11)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU AutomakeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that CMake excels in its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to easily manage builds across different operating systems, while GNU Automake is often noted for its strong integration with the GNU toolchain, making it a preferred choice for projects heavily reliant on GNU tools.
- Reviewers mention that CMake's scripting language is more flexible and powerful, enabling complex build configurations, whereas users say that GNU Automake's simplicity and ease of use make it ideal for smaller projects or those new to build systems.
- G2 users highlight that CMake has a steeper learning curve, with an ease of use rating of 6.6, compared to GNU Automake's 8.3, which reviewers say makes it more accessible for beginners.
- Users on G2 report that CMake's support for modern C++ features is a significant advantage, while GNU Automake is praised for its robust documentation and community support, with a quality of support rating of 7.9 compared to CMake's 7.2.
- Reviewers mention that CMake's product direction is viewed positively by 71% of users, indicating a strong commitment to evolving the product, while GNU Automake's product direction rating of 68% suggests a more stable but less innovative approach.
- Users say that CMake's ability to generate native build files for various IDEs is a standout feature, while GNU Automake's reliance on Makefiles is seen as a limitation by some, particularly in more complex build environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CMake
No pricing availableGNU Automake
No pricing availableFree Trial
CMake
No trial information availableGNU Automake
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
8.9
11
Ease of Use
6.6
16
8.3
11
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.2
10
7.9
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
6.8
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CMake and GNU Automake are categorized as Other Continuous Delivery
Unique Categories
CMake has no unique categories
GNU Automake has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CMake
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GNU Automake
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Computer Software
17.6%
Research
11.8%
Internet
11.8%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Other
29.4%
Consumer Services
18.2%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Research
9.1%
Religious Institutions
9.1%
Internet
9.1%
Other
45.5%
Discussions
CMake has no discussions with answers
GNU Automake has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
