# Top 10 GNU Automake Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 11
The Other Continuous Delivery Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with GNU Automake. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to GNU Automake include projects. The best overall GNU Automake alternative is CMake. Other similar apps like GNU Automake are SCons, FinalBuilder, Leiningen, and Apache Buildr. GNU Automake alternatives can be found in [Other Continuous Delivery Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to GNU Automake
  - [CMake](https://www.g2.com/products/cmake/reviews)
  - [SCons](https://www.g2.com/products/scons/reviews)
  - [FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/products/finalbuilder/reviews)
  - [Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/products/leiningen/reviews)
  - [Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-buildr/reviews)
  - [Distcc](https://www.g2.com/products/distcc/reviews)
  - [A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/products/a-a-p/reviews)
  - [Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-tekton/reviews)
  - [Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/products/rocket-enterprise-server/reviews)
  - [Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/products/boost-build/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to GNU Automake Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how GNU Automake stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Consumer Services, Health, Wellness and Fitness, and Religious Institutions, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [CMake](https://www.g2.com/products/cmake/reviews)
By Kitware
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 17
CMake is a family of tools designed to build, test and package software. CMake is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files. CMake generates native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of your choice.


Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare CMake with other alternatives:**
- [CMake vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-scons)
- [CMake vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-finalbuilder)
- [CMake vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-leiningen)
- [CMake vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-cmake)
- [CMake vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-distcc)
- [CMake vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-cmake)
- [CMake vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [CMake vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [CMake vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-cmake)

  ### 2. [SCons](https://www.g2.com/products/scons/reviews)
By SCons Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 17
SCons is an Open Source software construction tool-that is, a next-generation build tool.


Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-scons)
**Compare SCons with other alternatives:**
- [SCons vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/rocket-enterprise-server-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-scons)

  ### 3. [FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/products/finalbuilder/reviews)
By VSoft Technologies
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 13
Automating your Build process is simple with FinalBuilder. With FinalBuilder you don't need to edit xml, or write scripts. Visually define and debug your build scripts, then schedule them with windows scheduler, or integrate them with Continua CI, Jenkins or any other CI Server.


Reviewers say compared to GNU Automake, FinalBuilder is:
- More expensive
- Better at support
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare FinalBuilder with other alternatives:**
- [FinalBuilder vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-scons)
- [FinalBuilder vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-leiningen)
- [FinalBuilder vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [FinalBuilder vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [FinalBuilder vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-finalbuilder)

  ### 4. [Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/products/leiningen/reviews)
By Leiningen
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 3
Leiningen is the easiest way to use Clojure. With a focus on project automation and declarative configuration, it gets out of your way and lets you focus on your code.


Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-leiningen)
**Compare Leiningen with other alternatives:**
- [Leiningen vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-scons)
- [Leiningen vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Leiningen vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-leiningen)

  ### 5. [Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-buildr/reviews)
By The Apache Software Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 13
Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based applications, including support for Scala, Groovy and a growing number of JVM languages and tools.


Reviewers say compared to GNU Automake, Apache Buildr is:
- Better at support
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare Apache Buildr with other alternatives:**
- [Apache Buildr vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-cmake)
- [Apache Buildr vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-scons)
- [Apache Buildr vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-finalbuilder)
- [Apache Buildr vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-leiningen)
- [Apache Buildr vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-distcc)
- [Apache Buildr vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-apache-buildr)
- [Apache Buildr vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Apache Buildr vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Apache Buildr vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-boost-build)

  ### 6. [Distcc](https://www.g2.com/products/distcc/reviews)
By Distcc
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 11
distcc is a program to distribute builds of C, C++, Objective C or Objective C++ code across several machines on a network. distcc should always generate the same results as a local build, is simple to install and use, and is usually much faster than a local compile.


Reviewers say compared to GNU Automake, Distcc is:
- Better at support
- More usable
Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare Distcc with other alternatives:**
- [Distcc vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-distcc)
- [Distcc vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-scons)
- [Distcc vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-finalbuilder)
- [Distcc vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-leiningen)
- [Distcc vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-distcc)
- [Distcc vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-distcc)
- [Distcc vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Distcc vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Distcc vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-distcc)

  ### 7. [A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/products/a-a-p/reviews)
By NLnet Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 9
A-A-P makes it easy to locate, download, build and install software. It also supports browsing source code, developing programs, managing different versions and distribution of software and documentation. This means that A-A-P is useful both for users and for developers.


Reviewers say compared to GNU Automake, A-A-P is:
- Better at support
Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare A-A-P with other alternatives:**
- [A-A-P vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-cmake)
- [A-A-P vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-scons)
- [A-A-P vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-finalbuilder)
- [A-A-P vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-leiningen)
- [A-A-P vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-apache-buildr)
- [A-A-P vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-distcc)
- [A-A-P vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [A-A-P vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [A-A-P vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-boost-build)

  ### 8. [Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-tekton/reviews)
By Google
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 8
Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.


Reviewers say compared to GNU Automake, Google Cloud Tekton is:
- Better at support
Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
**Compare Google Cloud Tekton with other alternatives:**
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-scons)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-leiningen)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-google-cloud-tekton)

  ### 9. [Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/products/rocket-enterprise-server/reviews)
By Rocket Software
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 5
Micro Focus Enterprise Server provides an application deployment environment for rehosting IBM mainframe applications that have traditionally run on IBM z/OS environments.


Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
**Compare Rocket Enterprise Server with other alternatives:**
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/rocket-enterprise-server-vs-scons)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)

  ### 10. [Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/products/boost-build/reviews)
By Boost.Build
**Average Rating:** 3.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 1
Boost.Build takes care about compiling your sources with right options, creating static and shared libraries, making executables, and other chores - whether you're using gcc, msvc, or a dozen more supported C++ compilers - on Windows, OSX, Linux and commercial UNIX systems.


Categories in common with GNU Automake: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [GNU Automake vs Boost.Build](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare Boost.Build with other alternatives:**
- [Boost.Build vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-cmake)
- [Boost.Build vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-scons)
- [Boost.Build vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-finalbuilder)
- [Boost.Build vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-leiningen)
- [Boost.Build vs Apache Buildr](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-boost-build)
- [Boost.Build vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-distcc)
- [Boost.Build vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-boost-build)
- [Boost.Build vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Boost.Build vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/boost-build-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)


## Explore Articles
- [What's the best workforce management solution for call centers](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-workforce-management-solution-for-call-centers)
- [What MDM tool offers the most customizable data models?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-mdm-tool-offers-the-most-customizable-data-models)
- [What is the leading security compliance software for mobile use](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-leading-security-compliance-software-for-mobile-use)
- [Which AI sales assistant software do other businesses use](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-ai-sales-assistant-software-do-other-businesses-use)
- [Best software for simplifying event planning](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-software-for-simplifying-event-planning)
- [What are some email archiving solutions for financial services firms needing SEC and FINRA-compliant long-term retention?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-some-email-archiving-solutions-for-financial-services-firms-needing-sec-and-finra-compliant-long-term-retention )

## Spotlight Categories
- [Email Marketing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/email-marketing)
- [Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/application-performance-monitoring-apm)
- [Sales Enablement Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/sales-enablement)