Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Clang and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Clang
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ClangOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Clang excels in its Static Code Analysis with a score of 8.7, highlighting its ability to catch a wide range of coding errors and potential vulnerabilities early in the development process. In contrast, OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.3 in this area, indicating it may not be as comprehensive in its analysis.
- Reviewers mention that Clang's API / Integrations score of 9.0 is a significant advantage, allowing for seamless integration with various development environments and tools. OpenText Fortify, however, does not provide a specific score for this feature, which may limit its flexibility in certain workflows.
- G2 users highlight that Clang's Ease of Use is rated at 8.2, making it accessible for small businesses and new developers. On the other hand, OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a higher score of 8.7, suggesting it may offer a more user-friendly interface for enterprise-level users, but could be more complex for smaller teams.
- Reviewers say that Clang's False Positives score of 6.5 is a notable drawback, as users have reported encountering a higher number of false alerts compared to OpenText Fortify, which does not have a specific score but is generally perceived to have better accuracy in this regard.
- Users on G2 mention that OpenText Fortify's Quality of Support is rated at 8.6, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Clang, with a score of 8.3, is still considered reliable, but may not match the level of support provided by OpenText Fortify.
- Reviewers mention that Clang's Test Automation capabilities score 8.5, which is beneficial for teams looking to streamline their testing processes. OpenText Fortify, while not specifically rated in this area, is known for its robust compliance testing features, which can be crucial for enterprise users needing to meet regulatory standards.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Clang
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
Clang
No trial information availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.7
15
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.2
15
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.3
11
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
15
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Testing
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Clang and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Clang has no unique categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Clang
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Computer Software
18.8%
Information Services
12.5%
Banking
12.5%
Research
6.3%
Other
31.3%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
Clang has no discussions with answers
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
