When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Azure Container Registry easier to use, set up, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of administration with ZooKeeper.
Reviewers felt that Azure Container Registry meets the needs of their business better than ZooKeeper.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Azure Container Registry is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Azure Container Registry over ZooKeeper.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Container Registry
No pricing available
ZooKeeper
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Container Registry
No trial information available
ZooKeeper
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
33
8.9
68
Ease of Use
9.0
32
8.2
69
Ease of Setup
8.8
8
8.3
25
Ease of Admin
8.1
7
8.3
24
Quality of Support
8.9
30
8.5
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
7
8.6
19
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
32
7.2
67
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Container Registry
ZooKeeper
Azure Container Registry and ZooKeeper share no categories
Azure Container Registry or ACR used to store container images. These images can be used to create container. It has feature like version control for you...Read more
Azure Container Registry has no more discussions with answers
Zookeeper is a unit where the information regarding configuration, naming and group services are stored. It is a centralized unit and using these...Read more
Does Kafka still need ZooKeeper?
1 Comment
AN
Zookeeper is required for running Kafka for the current version (3.2.3) and previous versions. However, Kafka is planning to work independently of Zookeeper...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.